IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/fomkce/282195.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Kompetenzmanagement 50+ - Empfehlungen für den Mittelstand

Editor

Listed:
  • FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCE KompetenzCentrum für Entrepreneurship & Mittelstand

Author

Listed:
  • Genschick, Franziska
  • Ghanem, Christiane Al
  • Grimm, Rüdiger

Abstract

This publication aims to use a case study to determine the content and framework conditions of age-sensitive competence management and to derive recommendations for action. By applying qualitative methods such as expert interviews and the analysis of secondary sources, several relevant factors could be identified. The results show that there is no single tool for competence development for people over 50. Instead, it is the combination of different learning formats, groups of participants, methods and content that promotes the acquisition of competencies in the second half of the working life. It is recommended to provide mixedage measures to bring the generations together. At the same time, offerings tailored to the learning needs of the 50+ target group can provide specific benefits - for example, age-homogeneous small groups, age-oriented didactics, or content linked to participants' individual interests. In addition, the research found that employee appraisals play an important role in competency management, both for maintaining and developing competencies in the current position and for creating prospects for a job change. The research showed that in addition to the formal process aspects, the framework conditions, including motivation-related aspects, have a significant impact on the successful implementation of competence management for people over 50. It is recommended that the process be anchored at the top level and implemented through bottom-up and top-down planning and provision of operational measures, pilot projects, information and awareness campaigns, and regular reflection and updating. In particular, the study highlights the importance of the active participation of the employee group aged 50 and over, as well as the decisive role of managers. It also recommends that a fundamental shift in corporate culture toward an appreciative attitude toward all age groups and lifelong learning be pursued. The approaches to action in competence management 50+ should address strategic issues in order to promote the employability of older employees. This publication contributes to the concrete design of a competence management concept for employees 50+. The results can be transferred to other private companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Genschick, Franziska & Ghanem, Christiane Al & Grimm, Rüdiger, 2023. "Kompetenzmanagement 50+ - Empfehlungen für den Mittelstand," KCE Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCE KompetenzCentrum für Entrepreneurship & Mittelstand, volume 9, number 282195 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCE KompetenzCentrum für Entrepreneurship & Mittelstand.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomkce:282195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/282195/1/1869413377.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bieling, Gisela, 2011. "Age inclusion : Erfolgsauswirkungen des Umgangs mit Mitarbeitern unterschiedlicher Altersgruppen in Unternehmen," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 55548, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Hoe Sang Chung, 2020. "Quality choice and behavior-based price discrimination," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 223-236, December.
    3. Balasingham Balachandran & Robert Faff & Lily H. G. Nguyen & Premkanth Puwanenthiren, 2020. "The impact of audit quality in rights offerings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2007-2037, September.
    4. Muhammad Tahir & Syed Sadaqat Ali Shah & Aziz Ullah Sayal & Muhammad Asim Afridi, 2020. "Loan quality: does bank corporate governance matter?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 633-636, May.
    5. Xing Li & Xia Chen & Baolei Qi & Gaoliang Tian, 2020. "Employee quality and audit fee: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(5), pages 4533-4566, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le Wang & Xiaoyan Chen & Xing Li & Gaoliang Tian, 2021. "MD&A readability, auditor characteristics, and audit fees," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5025-5050, December.
    2. Jin, Yige & Dong, Nanyan & Tian, Gaoliang & Zhang, Junrui, 2023. "Wisdom of the masses: Employee education and corporate risk taking," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur, 2022. "Corporate culture and bank debt," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Anand, Amitabh & Dalmasso, Audrey & Vessal, Saeedeh Rezaee & Parameswar, Nakul & Rajasekar, James & Dhal, Manoranjan, 2023. "The effect of job security, insecurity, and burnout on employee organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Shuilin Liu & Xudong Lin & Xiaoli Huang & Hanyang Luo & Sumin Yu, 2023. "Research on Service-Driven Benign Market with Platform Subsidy Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. ur Rehman, Attique & Shakeel Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad & Farooq, Sami, 2022. "Manufacturing planning and control driven supply chain risk management: A dynamic capability perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Baban Eulaiwi & Ahmed Al‐Hadi & Lien Duong & Keira Clark & Grantley Taylor & Brian Perrin, 2022. "Audit pricing and corporate whistleblower governance: evidence from Australian financial firms," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2339-2384, June.
    8. Muzhi Wang & Weichen Yan, 2022. "Brain Gain: The Effect of Employee Quality on Corporate Social Responsibility," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(4), pages 679-713, December.
    9. Wang, Maochuan & Yan, Youliang, 2023. "Employee treatment and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Madia, Joan E. & Moscone, Francesco & Nicodemo, Catia, 2023. "Informal care, older people, and COVID-19: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 468-488.
    11. Md Jahidur Rahman & Tong Wu, 2021. "Volatility of other comprehensive income and audit fees: evidence from China," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Umezawa, Masashi, 2022. "Behavior-based price discrimination in a horizontally and vertically differentiated duopoly with switching costs," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Roxana Hinzmann & Martina Rašticová & Jakub Šácha, 2019. "Factors of Employee Engagement at the Workplace. Do Years of Service Count?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1525-1533.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomkce:282195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.