IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/38701.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Mögliche Ansätze zur Unterstützung von Familien

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Festl

    (WIFO)

  • Hedwig Lutz

    (WIFO)

  • Margit Schratzenstaller

Abstract

Österreich gibt im internationalen Vergleich einen überdurchschnittlich hohen Anteil der Wirtschaftsleistung für Familienleistungen aus. Dennoch konnte weder eine Stabilisierung oder Steigerung der Fertilität noch das Ziel einer Gleichstellung im erforderlichen Umfang erreicht werden. Vor diesem Hintergrund geht die Studie der Frage nach, welche Auswirkungen unterschiedliche Ansätze der Familienförderung auf die Erwerbsbeteiligung von Frauen und auf die materielle Situation von Familien haben können. Dazu werden nationale und internationale Analysen für die österreichische Situation strukturiert aufbereitet und mögliche Effekte alternativer Strategien aufgezeigt. Davon ausgehend werden die unmittelbaren Konsequenzen verschiedener Maßnahmen zur Familienförderung für die öffentlichen Haushalte abgeschätzt und das "Familienpaket", als Element der Steuerreform 2009, evaluiert. Die Reformoptionen für das österreichische System der Familienförderung, welche die Studie abschließend skizziert, umfassen im Bereich der Geldleistungen insbesondere die Abschaffung des Alleinverdienerabsetzbetrags für kinderlose Familien sowie die Einführung eines einkommensabhängigen Kinderbetreuungsgeldes mit einer relativ geringen Bezugsdauer, einer Mindestinanspruchnahme durch den zweiten Elternteil sowie einer Auszahlungsobergrenze. Da eine quantitativ und qualitativ ausreichende Betreuungsinfrastruktur grundlegende Voraussetzung für die Steigerung und Sicherung der Frauenerwerbsbeteiligung ist, sind die jüngsten Schritte zu ihrem Ausbau zu begrüßen. Über die geplanten Investitionen hinaus wären aber weitere Ressourcen in diesen Bereich zu lenken. Schließlich soll in den Instrumentenkatalog der Vereinbarkeitspolitik neben dem Engagement der öffentlichen Hand sowie Instrumenten, die an der Ebene der privaten Haushalte ansetzen (etwa steuerliche Berücksichtigung von Kinderbetreuungskosten), auch die betriebliche Ebene einbezogen werden, etwa durch eine höhere steuerliche Förderung betrieblicher Betreuungseinrichtungen.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Festl & Hedwig Lutz & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2010. "Mögliche Ansätze zur Unterstützung von Familien," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 38701, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:38701
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/38701
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herwig Immervoll & Horacio Levy & Christine Lietz & Daniela Mantovani & Cathal O’Donoghue & Holly Sutherland & Gerlinde Verbist, 2006. "Household Incomes and Redistribution in the European Union: Quantifying the Equalizing Properties of Taxes and Benefits," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Dimitri B. Papadimitriou (ed.), The Distributional Effects of Government Spending and Taxation, chapter 5, pages 135-165, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Alois Guger & Markus Marterbauer, 2005. "Langfristige Tendenzen der Einkommensverteilung in Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 78(9), pages 615-628, September.
    3. Helene Dearing & Helmut Hofer & Christine Lietz & Rudolf Winter-Ebmer & Katharina Wrohlich, 2007. "Why Are Mothers Working Longer Hours in Austria than in Germany? A Comparative Microsimulation Analysis," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 28(4), pages 463-495, December.
    4. Hedwig Lutz, 2004. "Wiedereinstieg und Beschäftigung von Frauen mit Kleinkindern. Ein Vergleich der bisherigen Karenzregelung mit der Übergangsregelung zum Kinderbetreuungsgeld," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 24945, February.
    5. Brink, Anna & Nordblom, Katarina & Wahlberg, Roger, 2007. "Maximum fee vs child benefit: A welfare analysis of Swedish child-care fee reform," Working Papers in Economics 250, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    6. Esping-Andersen, Gosta, 1999. "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198742005.
    7. Levy, Horacio & Lietz, Christine & Sutherland, Holly, 2006. "Alternative Tax-Benefit Strategies to Support Children in the European Union. Recent Reforms in Austria, Spain and the UK," Economics Series 185, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    8. Nabanita Datta Gupta & Nina Smith & Mette Verner, 2008. "PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 65-89, March.
    9. Georg Feigl & Markus Marterbauer & Miriam Rehm, 2012. "Einkommensverteilung und Krise," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 38(2), pages 357-367.
    10. Michael Shalev & Hadas Mandel, 2006. "A Class Perspective on Gender Inequality: How Welfare States Shape the Gender Pay Gap," LIS Working papers 433, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    11. Anna Brink & Katarina Nordblom & Roger Wahlberg, 2007. "Maximum fee versus child benefit: a welfare analysis of Swedish child-care fee reform," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 14(4), pages 457-480, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tibor Paul Hanappi & Sandra Müllbacher, 2016. "Tax incentives and family labor supply in Austria," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 961-987, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bargain, Olivier & Orsini, Kristian & Peichl, Andreas, 2011. "Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US," IZA Discussion Papers 5820, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Olivier Bargain & Kristian Orsini & Andreas Peichl, 2014. "Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the United States: New Results," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 49(3), pages 723-838.
    3. Alois Guger & Silvia Rocha-Akis, 2016. "Umverteilung durch den Staat in Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(5), pages 329-345, May.
    4. Olivier Bargain & Andreas Peichl, 2013. "Steady-State Labor Supply Elasticities: An International Comparison," AMSE Working Papers 1322, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    5. Olivier Bargain & Kristian Orsini & Andreas Peichl, 2012. "Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US: New Results," Working Papers halshs-00805736, HAL.
    6. Guyonne Kalb & Thor Thoresen, 2010. "A comparison of family policy designs of Australia and Norway using microsimulation models," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 255-287, June.
    7. Wim Van Lancker & Joris Ghysels, 2011. "Who reaps the benefits? The social distribution of public childcare in Sweden and Flanders," Working Papers 1106, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    8. Olivier Bargain & Andreas Peichl, 2016. "Own-wage labor supply elasticities: variation across time and estimation methods," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-31, December.
    9. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2014. "Familienpolitik in ausgewählten europäischen Ländern im Vergleich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 50840, February.
    10. Bargain, Olivier & Peichl, Andreas, 2013. "Steady-state labor supply elasticities: A survey," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-084, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. Gudrun Biffl & Thomas Leoni, 2006. "Handlungsoptionen für eine Erhöhung der Einkommensgerechtigkeit und Chancengleichheit für Frauen in Oberösterreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 26424, February.
    12. Lancker, W. van & Ghysels, J., 2011. "GINI DP 10: Who Reaps the Benefits? The social distribution of public childcare in Sweden and Flanders," GINI Discussion Papers 10, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    13. Bessho, Shun-ichiro & Hayashi, Masayoshi, 2014. "Intensive margins, extensive margins, and spousal allowances in the Japanese system of personal income taxes: A discrete choice analysis," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 162-178.
    14. Christina Gathmann & Björn Sass, 2012. "Taxing Childcare: Effects on Family Labor Supply and Children," CESifo Working Paper Series 3776, CESifo.
    15. Anna Kurowska & Michal Myck & Katharina Wrohlich, 2012. "Family and Labor Market Choices: Requirements to Guide Effective Evidence-Based Policy," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1234, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Alois Guger & Käthe Knittler & Markus Marterbauer & Margit Schratzenstaller & Ewald Walterskirchen, 2008. "Analyse alternativer Finanzierungsformen der sozialen Sicherungssysteme," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 37521, February.
    17. Siflinger, Bettina & van den Berg, Gerard, 2016. "The Effects of a Universal Child Care Reform on Child Health – Evidence from Sweden," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145765, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Christina Gathmann & Björn Sass, 2018. "Taxing Childcare: Effects on Childcare Choices, Family Labor Supply, and Children," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(3), pages 665-709.
    19. Tibor Paul Hanappi & Sandra Müllbacher, 2016. "Tax incentives and family labor supply in Austria," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 961-987, December.
    20. Alois Guger & Thomas Leoni, 2008. "Die Entwicklung der Einkommen und der Einkommensverteilung in Oberösterreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 39955, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:38701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.