IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/upj/ubooks/bb.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Bidding for Business: The Efficacy of Local Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • John E. Anderson

    (University of Nebraska)

  • Robert W. Wassmer

    (California State University-Sacramento)

Abstract

Anderson and Wassmer examine the use and effectiveness of local economic development incentives within a specific region, the Detroit metropolitan area. The Detroit area serves as a good example, they say, because of the area's 20-plus year track record of its communities offering the gamut of economic incentives aimed at redirecting economic activity and jobs. The evidence they uncover reveals factors that drive cities not just in this Southeast Michigan area, but nationwide to offer particular types of incentives that are more or less generous than those offered by their neighbors.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Anderson & Robert W. Wassmer, 2000. "Bidding for Business: The Efficacy of Local Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number bb, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:upj:ubooks:bb
    Note: PDF is the book's first chapter.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=up_bookchapters
    Download Restriction: All books are copyrighted.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esteban G. Dalehite & John L. Mikesell & C. Kurt Zorn, 2005. "Variation in Property Tax Abatement Programs Among States," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 19(2), pages 157-173, May.
    2. Robert T. Greenbaum, 2004. "Siting it Right: Do States Target Economic Distress When Designating Enterprise Zones?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 18(1), pages 67-80, February.
    3. Burge, Gregory, 2014. "The capitalization effects of school, residential, and commercial impact fees on undeveloped land values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Anderson, John E., 2012. "State Tax Rankings: What Do They and Don’t They Tell Us?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(4), pages 985-1010, December.
    5. Richard Funderburg & Timothy J. Bartik & Alan H. Peters & Peter S. Fisher, 2013. "The Impact Of Marginal Business Taxes On State Manufacturing," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 557-582, October.
    6. John Dove & Daniel Sutter, 2018. "Is There a Tradeoff Between Economic Development Incentives and Economic Freedom? Evidence from the US States," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 48(1), pages 55-69, Spring.
    7. Charles W. Swenson, 2015. "The Death of California Redevelopment Areas," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(3), pages 211-228, August.
    8. Kenyon, Daphne A. & Langley, Adam H. & Paquin, Bethany P., 2012. "Property Tax Incentive Pitfalls," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(4), pages 1011-1021, December.
    9. Carlianne Patrick, 2014. "Does Increasing Available Non-Tax Economic Development Incentives Result in More Jobs?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(2), pages 351-386, June.
    10. Guimaraes, Paulo & Figueiredo, Octávio & Woodward, Douglas, 2002. "Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties," ERSA conference papers ersa02p060, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Robert W. Wassmer, 2002. "Fiscalisation of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries and Non-central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1307-1327, July.
    12. Michael J. Hicks & Michael LaFaive, 2011. "The Influence of Targeted Economic Development Tax Incentives on County Economic Growth: Evidence From Michigan’s MEGA Credits," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(2), pages 193-205, May.
    13. Laura A. Reese, 2014. "The Alchemy of Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(3), pages 206-219, August.
    14. Mark Skidmore & David Merriman & Russ Kashian, 2009. "The Relationship between Tax Increment Finance and Municipal Land Annexation," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 85(4), pages 598-613.
    15. Carlianne Patrick, 2014. "The economic development incentives game: an imperfect information, heterogeneous communities approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), pages 137-156, August.
    16. Robert C. Turner & Mark K. Cassell, 2007. "When Do States Pursue Targeted Economic Development Policies? The Adoption and Expansion of State Enterprise Zone Programs," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(1), pages 86-103, March.
    17. Landers, Jim, 2006. "Why Don't Enterprise Zones Work? Estimates of the Extent that EZ Benefits are Capitalized into Property Values," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16.
    18. Daphne Kenyon & Robert Wassmer & Adam Langley & Bethany Paquin, 2020. "The Effects of Property Tax Abatements on School District Property Tax Bases and Rates," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(3), pages 227-241, August.
    19. Richard Funderburg & Joshua Drucker & David Merriman & Rachel Weber, 2021. "Is Tax Competition Strategic? Spatial Distributions of Business Property Tax Abatements in the Chicago Suburbs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(1), pages 66-83, February.
    20. Jasper Beekmans & Huub Ploegmakers & Karel Martens & Erwin van der Krabben, 2016. "Countering decline of industrial sites: Do local economic development policies target the neediest places?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3027-3047, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regional economic development; tax incentives; spatial competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics
    • R38 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upj:ubooks:bb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/upjohus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.