IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/esr/resser/sustat96.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Public understanding and perceptions of the COVID-19 Test-and-Trace system

Author

Listed:
  • Timmons, Shane
  • Barjaková, Martina
  • Robertson, Deirdre
  • Belton, Cameron
  • Lunn, Pete

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Timmons, Shane & Barjaková, Martina & Robertson, Deirdre & Belton, Cameron & Lunn, Pete, 2020. "Public understanding and perceptions of the COVID-19 Test-and-Trace system," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT96, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:esr:resser:sustat96
    DOI: /10.26504/sustat96
    Note: Published by the ESRI
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esri.ie/pubs/SUSTAT96.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io//10.26504/sustat96?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ansolabehere, Stephen & Schaffner, Brian F., 2014. "Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 285-303, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    RePEc Biblio mentions

    As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography for Economics:
    1. > Economics of Welfare > Health Economics > Economics of Pandemics > Specific pandemics > Covid-19 > Health > Tracing

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helbling, Marc & Jungkunz, Sebastian, 2020. "Social divides in the age of globalization," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(6), pages 1187-1210.
    2. Piatak Jaclyn, 2023. "Do Sociocultural Factors Drive Civic Engagement? An Examination of Political Interest and Religious Attendance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 185-204, April.
    3. Capers, Marshae & Chamberlain, Jillian & Cline, Jordan & Metcalfe, Christi & Murphy, Akili, 2024. "Beyond George Floyd: Assessing sentiments on police fund reallocation and its intersection with race and racial resentment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. David M. Konisky & Llewelyn Hughes & Charles H. Kaylor, 2016. "Extreme weather events and climate change concern," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 533-547, February.
    5. McFadden, Brandon R. & Malone, Trey, 2018. "How will mandatory labeling of genetically modified food nudge consumer decision-making?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 186-194.
    6. Craig F. Berning & Brian E. Roe, 2017. "Assessing the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard of 2016: Can Americans Access Electronic Disclosure Information?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, May.
    7. Anderson, Brilé & Bernauer, Thomas, 2016. "How much carbon offsetting and where? Implications of efficiency, effectiveness, and ethicality considerations for public opinion formation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 387-395.
    8. Aaron Martin & Timothy B Gravelle & Erik Baekkeskov & Jenny Lewis & Yoshi Kashima, 2019. "Enlisting the support of trusted sources to tackle policy problems: The case of antimicrobial resistance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-9, March.
    9. Rudolph, Lukas & Freitag, Markus & Thurner, Paul, 2021. "The Comparative Legitimacy of Arms Exports - A Conjoint Experiment in Germany and France," SocArXiv r73pv, Center for Open Science.
    10. Hannan, Kellie & Cullen, Francis T. & Butler, Leah C. & Graham, Amanda & Burton, Alexander L. & Burton, Velmer S. Jr., 2020. "Racial Sympathy and Support for Capital Punishment: A Case Study in Concept Transfer," SocArXiv xybj9, Center for Open Science.
    11. Zhenyu Wang & Yi Hu & Xingshang Yu & Hong Tan & Kinglun Ngok, 2024. "Online Compulsive Buying and Psychological Distress : A Person-Centered Approach and Reflections on Chinese Social Policy," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(6), pages 3407-3437, December.
    12. Ulla A. Saari & Rupert J. Baumgartner & Saku J. Mäkinen, 2017. "Eco-Friendly Brands to Drive Sustainable Development: Replication and Extension of the Brand Experience Scale in a Cross-National Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Pforr Klaus & Dannwolf Tanja, 2017. "What do we Lose with Online-Only Surveys? Estimating the Bias in Selected Political Variables Due to Online Mode Restriction," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 105-120, October.
    14. Pickett, Justin & Graham, Amanda & Nix, Justin & Cullen, Francis T., 2022. "Officer Diversity May Reduce Black Americans’ Fear of the Police," SocArXiv 7mrgp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    15. Radford, Jason & Green, Jon & Quintana, Alexi & Safarpour, Alauna & Simonson, Matthew D & Baum, Matthew & Lazer, David & Ognyanova, Katherine & Druckman, James & Perlis, Roy, 2022. "Evaluating the generalizability of the COVID States survey — a large-scale, non-probability survey," OSF Preprints cwkg7, Center for Open Science.
    16. Rinscheid, Adrian & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2018. "Divesting, Fast and Slow: Affective and Cognitive Drivers of Fading Voter Support for a Nuclear Phase-Out," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 51-61.
    17. Lipps Oliver & Pekari Nicolas, 2016. "Sample Representation and Substantive Outcomes Using Web With and Without Incentives Compared to Telephone in an Election Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 165-186, March.
    18. Ofrit Kol & Dorit Zimand-Sheiner & Shalom Levy, 2024. "A tale of two paths to vaccine acceptance: self-interest and collective interest effect, mediated by institutional trust, and moderated by gender," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. Ulla A. Saari & Saku J. Mäkinen, 2017. "Measuring brand experiences cross-nationally," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 86-104, January.
    20. Kirill Chmel & Aigul Klimova & Nikita Savin, 2023. "Saving lives or saving the economy? Support for the incumbent during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 291-307, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esr:resser:sustat96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Burns (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esriiie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.