IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ecr/col111/27937.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Encuestas de ingresos y gastos: conceptos y métodos en la experiencia latinoamericana

Editor

Listed:
  • CEPAL

Author

Listed:
  • -

Abstract

Reune recomendaciones emanadas del seminario que tuvo como objetivo lograr un intercambio y un registro de las metodologias utilizadas en encuestas de ingresos y gastos familiares, para aprovechar la experiencia acumulada en los planos nacional y regional.

Suggested Citation

  • -, 1986. "Encuestas de ingresos y gastos: conceptos y métodos en la experiencia latinoamericana," Cuadernos de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 27937 edited by Cepal, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col111:27937
    Note: Incluye Bibliografía
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/27937
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Ferber, 1974. "Consumer Expenditure and Price Data: An Overview," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 3, number 2, pages 299-305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Isabel McWhinney & Harold E. Champion, 1974. "The Canadian Experience with Recall and Diary Methods in Consumer Expenditure Surveys," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 3, number 2, pages 411-437, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sepúlveda Whittle, Tomás, 1987. "Basic concepts of maritime transport and its present status in Latin America and the Caribbean," Cuadernos de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 27812 edited by Eclac, September.
    2. -, 1986. "CEPAL Review no.30," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    3. Ana Silvia Vilker, 2002. "Resultados de la comparación de la Encuesta Nacional de Gastos de los Hogares (ENGH) 1996-1997 de Argentina y la Encuesta de Gastos 1993-1994 (Konsumerhebung) de Austria," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2002_03, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferroni, Marco, 1982. "Large-sample monitoring of household expenditure and Food consumption in partial subsistence economies: A methodological note," Staff Papers 197556, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. John Bagnall & David Bounie & Kim P. Huynh & Anneke Kosse & Tobias Schmidt & Scott Schuh, 2016. "Consumer Cash Usage: A Cross-Country Comparison with Payment Diary Survey Data," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 12(4), pages 1-61, December.
    3. Backiny-Yetna,Prospere R. & Yacoubou Djima,Ismael & Steele,Diane E. & Backiny-Yetna,Prospere R. & Yacoubou Djima,Ismael & Steele,Diane E., 2014. "The impact of household food consumption data collection methods on poverty and inequality measures in Niger," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7090, The World Bank.
    4. Xu, Ke & Ravndal, Frode & Evans, David B. & Carrin, Guy, 2009. "Assessing the reliability of household expenditure data: Results of the World Health Survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 297-305, August.
    5. Naeem Ahmed & Matthew Brzozowski & Thomas F. Crossley, 2005. "Measurement Errors in Recall Food Expenditure Data," Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports 396, McMaster University.
    6. Brzozowski, Matthew & Crossley, Thomas F. & Winter, Joachim K., 2017. "A comparison of recall and diary food expenditure data," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 53-61.
    7. John Gibson, 2002. "Why Does the Engel Method Work? Food Demand, Economies of Size and Household Survey Methods," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 64(4), pages 341-359, September.
    8. Thomas F. Crossley & Joachim K. Winter, 2014. "Asking Households about Expenditures: What Have We Learned?," NBER Chapters, in: Improving the Measurement of Consumer Expenditures, pages 23-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Backiny-Yetna, Prospère & Steele, Diane & Yacoubou Djima, Ismael, 2017. "The impact of household food consumption data collection methods on poverty and inequality measures in Niger," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 7-19.
    10. Beegle, Kathleen & De Weerdt, Joachim & Friedman, Jed & Gibson, John, 2012. "Methods of household consumption measurement through surveys: Experimental results from Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 3-18.
    11. Naeem Ahmed & Matthew Brzozowski & Thomas Crossley, 2006. "Measurement errors in recall food consumption data," IFS Working Papers W06/21, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    12. Marcin Hitczenko, 2013. "Optimal recall period length in consumer payment surveys," Working Papers 13-16, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    13. Matthew Brzozowski & Thomas F. Crossley, 2011. "Viewpoint: Measuring the well-being of the poor with income or consumption: a Canadian perspective," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(1), pages 88-106, February.
    14. Troubat, Nathalie & Grünberger, Klaus, 2017. "Impact of survey design in the estimation of habitual food consumption," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 132-145.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col111:27937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.