IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifofob/102.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The German Small Investor Protection Act from 2015: Practical Experiences with the Exemptions

Author

Listed:
  • Christa Hainz
  • Lars Hornuf

Abstract

The Small Investor Protection Act of 2015 (Kleinanlegerschutzgesetz, short: KASG) is intended to provide greater transparency for investors on the so-called "grey capital market" through stronger regulation. However, the law also contains exceptions. These exempt firms, which finance themselves via crowd-investing platforms, as well as social, charitable and religious projects, from the prospectus requirement when financed via so-called investments. In this report, the effects of these exemptions are analyzed using a comprehensive crowd-investing database and surveys of social and charitable organizations. On average, the crowd-investing market grew at an annual rate of 197% between 2011 and 2017 and has a cumulative volume of 364 million euros by now (as of 1 April 2018). The main driver of growth was the expansion of real estate financing. The study shows that the type of investments used for crowd investing have developed from silent partnerships to profit-participating loans and, above all, subordinated loans. However, the use of securities and prospectuses is still low. There was an increase in issues between 1 and 2.5 million euros in the total market volume. In addition, more issuers are approaching the 2.5-million-euro threshold. The number of investors who invested exactly 1,000 euros on crowd-investing portals also rose slightly after the KASG came into effect. Moreover, since then the overall number of investors investing more than 10,000 euros decreased. These developments can be interpreted as an indication of the effectiveness of the thresholds in sales price and in investments. In the area of social and charitable projects, the legal exemptions are rarely applied, as other exemptions provide easier exemptions from the prospectus requirement.

Suggested Citation

  • Christa Hainz & Lars Hornuf, 2019. "The German Small Investor Protection Act from 2015: Practical Experiences with the Exemptions," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 102.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_102_2019_Kleinanlegerschutzgesetz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Hornuf & Armin Schwienbacher, 2017. "Should securities regulation promote equity crowdfunding?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 579-593, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lars Hornuf & Eliza Stenzhorn & Tim Vintis, 2022. "Are sustainability-oriented investors different? Evidence from equity crowdfunding," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1662-1689, December.
    2. Christa Hainz & Lars Hornuf & Lisa Nagel & Sarah Reiter & Eliza Stenzhorn, 2019. "Exemption Provisions of the German Small Investor Protection Act: A Follow-up Study," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(02), pages 41-51, August.
    3. Lars Hornuf & Eliza Stenzhorn & Tim Vintis, 2020. "Are Sustainability-Oriented Investors Different? Evidence from Equity Crowdfunding," CESifo Working Paper Series 8339, CESifo.
    4. Christa Hainz & Lars Hornuf & Lisa Nagel & Sarah Reiter & Eliza Stenzhorn & Sarah Kiesl-Reiter, 2019. "Die Befreiungsvorschriften des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes: Eine Follow-up-Studie," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(09), pages 26-37, May.
    5. Lars Hornuf & Eliza Stenzhorn & Tim Vintis, 2020. "Are Sustainability-Oriented Investors Different? Evidence from Equity Crowdfunding," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2011, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emil Adamek & Jan Janku, 2022. "What Drives Small Business Crowdfunding? Impact of Macroeconomic and Financial Factors," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 72(2), pages 172-196, June.
    2. Douglas Cumming & Lars Hornuf & Moein Karami & Denis Schweizer, 2023. "Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1103-1128, February.
    3. Goethner, Maximilian & Hornuf, Lars & Regner, Tobias, 2021. "Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Alaassar, Ahmad & Mention, Anne-Laure & Aas, Tor Helge, 2021. "Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Lars Hornuf & Matthias Schmitt & Eliza Stenzhorn, 2020. "Does a Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8154, CESifo.
    6. Silvio Vismara, 2022. "Expanding corporate finance perspectives to equity crowdfunding," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1629-1639, December.
    7. Coakley, Jerry & Lazos, Aristogenis & Liñares-Zegarra, José M., 2022. "Seasoned equity crowdfunded offerings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Bömer, Max & Maxin, Hannes, 2018. "Why Fintechs Cooperate with Banks - Evidence from Germany," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-637, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    9. Meoli, Michele & Vismara, Silvio, 2021. "Information manipulation in equity crowdfunding markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Lars Hornuf & Matthias Schmitt & Eliza Stenzhorn, 2017. "Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up Funding and Firm Failure," CESifo Working Paper Series 6642, CESifo.
    11. Merello, Paloma & Barberá, Antonio & la Poza, Elena De, 2022. "Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Massimiliano Barbi & Valentina Febo & Giancarlo Giudici, 2023. "Community-level social capital and investment decisions in equity crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1075-1110, October.
    13. Saul Estrin & Susanna Khavul & Mike Wright, 2022. "Soft and hard information in equity crowdfunding: network effects in the digitalization of entrepreneurial finance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1761-1781, April.
    14. Michael E. Cummings & Hans Rawhouser & Silvio Vismara & Erin L. Hamilton, 2020. "An equity crowdfunding research agenda: evidence from stakeholder participation in the rulemaking process," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 907-932, April.
    15. Fabrice Hervé & Armin Schwienbacher, 2018. "Crowdfunding And Innovation," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1514-1530, December.
    16. Alice Rossi & Silvio Vismara, 2018. "What do crowdfunding platforms do? A comparison between investment-based platforms in Europe," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(1), pages 93-118, March.
    17. Andreas Wald & Merete Holmesland & Kalanit Efrat, 2019. "It Is Not All About Money: Obtaining Additional Benefits Through Equity Crowdfunding," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 28(2), pages 270-294, September.
    18. Michael M. Moedl, 2021. "Two’s a company, three’s a crowd: Deal breaker terms in equity crowdfunding for prospective venture capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 927-952, August.
    19. Kukurba Maria & Waszkiewicz Aneta, 2018. "Crowdfunding as a Form of Funding for Businesses in the Culturally-Changing Global Economy: A Literature Review," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 99-137, June.
    20. Christa Hainz & Lars Hornuf & Lars Klöhn & Björn Brauer & Felix Ehrenfried & Gerrit Engelmann, 2017. "The Exemption Provisions of the German Retail Investor Protection Act," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(06), pages 26-35, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.