IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/hsgmrs/276066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zielgruppenansprache im Sponsoring mittels Gamification - Beispiel: mobiles Spiel "schaz"

Author

Listed:
  • Drenger, Jan
  • König, Werner
  • Kaiser, Sascha

Abstract

Das Konzept der Gamification bietet Unternehmen die Chance, ihre Zielgruppen für ihr Sponsoring-Engagement zu aktivieren. Der Beitrag zeigt anhand eines Fallbeispiels, wie sich Sponsoren einer Veranstaltung in ein pervasives mobiles Werbespiel integrieren lassen. Weiterhin wird die Kommunikationswirkung des Werbespiels anhand empirischer Daten diskutiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Drenger, Jan & König, Werner & Kaiser, Sascha, 2019. "Zielgruppenansprache im Sponsoring mittels Gamification - Beispiel: mobiles Spiel "schaz"," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 36(6), pages 52-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmrs:276066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/276066/1/MRSG_2019_6_52-58.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai Huotari & Juho Hamari, 2017. "A definition for gamification: anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(1), pages 21-31, February.
    2. Norm O’Reilly & Denyse Lafrance Horning, 2013. "Leveraging sponsorship: The activation ratio," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 424-437, October.
    3. O’Reilly, Norm & Lafrance Horning, Denyse, 2013. "Leveraging sponsorship: The activation ratio," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 424-437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    2. Dickson, Geoff & Naylor, Michael & Phelps, Sean, 2015. "Consumer attitudes towards ambush marketing," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 280-290.
    3. Herrmann, Jean-Luc & Kacha, Mathieu & Derbaix, Christian, 2016. "“I support your team, support me in turn!”," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 604-612.
    4. John A. Fortunato, 2016. "Business-to-business sponsorship opportunities: Examining UPS’s functional congruence with the NCAA," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 36-50, January.
    5. Daniela Andreini & Giuseppe Pedeliento, 2014. "The multichannel effects of sponsorship: an empirical analysis," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 65-83.
    6. Parshakov, Petr & Naidenova, Iuliia & Barajas, Angel, 2020. "Spillover effect in promotion: Evidence from video game publishers and eSports tournaments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 262-270.
    7. Martin, David S. & Bourdeau, Brian L. & Stephan, John, 2020. "Measuring the effectiveness of facility naming rights sponsorships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-64.
    8. T. Bettina Cornwell & Youngbum Kwon, 2020. "Sponsorship-linked marketing: research surpluses and shortages," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 607-629, July.
    9. Teal, Renee & Roberts, Michele & Harrigan, Paul & Clarkson, Jo & Rosenberg, Michael, 2020. "Leveraging spectator emotion: A review and conceptual framework for marketing health behaviors in elite sports," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 183-199.
    10. Eshghi, Kamran, 2022. "Are sports sponsorship announcements good news for shareholders? A meta-analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 268-287.
    11. John A Fortunato, 2016. "How the Citi Olympic sponsorship strategy uses the knowledge of the elaboration likelihood model," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 76-85, March.
    12. Xiaoyu Xu & Luyao Wang & Kai Zhao, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Consumers’ Platform Usage in “Double Eleven” Shopping Carnival in China: Cognition and Emotion from an Integrated Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Lackes, Richard & Siepermann, Markus & Vetter, Georg, 2020. "What drives decision makers to follow or ignore forecasting tools - A game based analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 315-322.
    14. Rainer Alt & Hans-Dieter Zimmermann, 2019. "Electronic Markets on platform competition," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 143-149, June.
    15. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Parjanen, Satu & Hyypiä, Mirva, 2019. "Innotin game supporting collective creativity in innovation activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 26-34.
    17. Hatice Doğan-Südaş & Ali Kara & Emre Karaca, 2023. "Effects of Gamified Mobile Apps on Purchase Intentions and Word-of-Mouth Engagement: Implications for Sustainability Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Syrjälä, Henna & Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele & Luomala, Harri T. & Joelsson, Tapani N. & Könnölä, Kaisa & Mäkilä, Tuomas, 2020. "Gamified package: Consumer insights into multidimensional brand engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 423-434.
    19. Feng, Wenting & Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan, 2020. "Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Frank Ebbers & Jan Zibuschka & Christian Zimmermann & Oliver Hinz, 2021. "User preferences for privacy features in digital assistants," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 411-426, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmrs:276066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://imc.unisg.ch/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.