IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/334372.html

Ethical Dimensions of Capacity-Building for Community Engagement: A Study of Ward Committee Members in Johannesburg’s Ward 68

Author

Listed:
  • Hlungwana, Jabulani
  • Mdhlalose, Dickson

Abstract

Research Problem:Ward Committees play a critical role in facilitating community engagement and participatory governance at the local level. However, in Johannesburg’s Ward 68, limited and inconsistent capacity-building initiatives raise ethical and moral concerns regardingaccountability, trust, and inclusivity in local governance. Insufficient training and institutional support undermine the ability of Ward Committee members to engage communities effectively and ethically.Research Purposes:This study aims to examine capacity-building initiatives among Ward Committees in Ward 68 of the City of Johannesburg, with a particular focus on the ethical and moral dimensions of community engagement. Specifically, the study seeks to identify ways to enhance the skills, knowledge, and ethical competencies required by Ward Committee members to foster trust, accountability, and constructive relationships with local communities.Research Methods:The study adopts a qualitative research approach using semi-structured interviews. Primary data were collected through in-depth interviews with ten Ward Committee members, while secondary data were obtained from academic journals, government publications, and City of Johannesburg reports. The data were analysed thematically to identify recurring patterns and themes relevant to ethical governance and capacity-building.Results and Discussion:The findings reveal that the City of Johannesburg primarily provided induction training for Ward Committees, with limited follow-up or continuous capacity-building. Some members were unable to attend the training due to various constraints, while others attended but could not recall its content. These limitations, alongside broader structural and operational challenges, weakened the ethical effectiveness of Ward Committees, particularly in promoting inclusive participation, accountability, and trust in community engagement.Research Implications and Contributions: This study contributes empirical insights into the ethical challenges affecting capacity-building in Ward Committees within a metropolitan governance context. It highlights the need for ethically informed, ward-specific training programmes, clearer role definitions, improved remuneration, and equitable representation policies. By foregrounding the moral dimensions of participatory governance, the study offers practical and theoretical contributions to debates on ethical public policy and local governance in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Hlungwana, Jabulani & Mdhlalose, Dickson, 2025. "Ethical Dimensions of Capacity-Building for Community Engagement: A Study of Ward Committee Members in Johannesburg’s Ward 68," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 127-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:334372
    DOI: 10.15575/rpj.v3i2.2156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/334372/1/Ethical-Dimensions-of-Capacity-Building.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15575/rpj.v3i2.2156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H79 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:334372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.