Author
Listed:
- Klinke, Dennis
- Jacobsen, Jannes
- Dierse, Manuel
- Faas, Thorsten
- Gerstorf, Denis
- Helal, Hannah
- Hutter, Swen
- Schieferdecker, David
- Schwander, Hanna
- von Scheve, Christian
- Specht, Jule
Abstract
Non-probability samples have become increasingly popular despite some criticism. This paper examines social media sampling as a tool for accessing hard-to-survey populations. Our study targeted individuals in Germany using ads on Facebook and X, yielding 4,590 respondents. We compared these samples with high-quality probability samples (SOEP, ESS) through measurement equivalence analysis of shared measures between samples. Results show that our social media sampling strategy yielded effective sample sizes for our target population that exceeded those from SOEP and ESS by ratios between 2:1 and 5:1. Our findings suggest that non-probability sampling can be a viable method for researchers examining relational patterns among variables in hard-to-survey populations. Because we observe varying levels of measurement equivalence, rigorous methodological strategies for post-hoc analyses are recommended. We propose measurement equivalence analysis as a post-hoc assessment strategy to quantify the analytical effectiveness of the employed sampling strategy.
Suggested Citation
Klinke, Dennis & Jacobsen, Jannes & Dierse, Manuel & Faas, Thorsten & Gerstorf, Denis & Helal, Hannah & Hutter, Swen & Schieferdecker, David & Schwander, Hanna & von Scheve, Christian & Specht, Jule, 2025.
"Social media sampling is an effective way to access hard to survey populations and low prevalence groups,"
EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-20.
Handle:
RePEc:zbw:espost:331212
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2025.2564866
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:331212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.