IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/253378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘When creativity gets you fired—why professionals tasked with innovation employ subversion when facing competing institutional demands in hybrid organizations’

Author

Listed:
  • Vogelgsang, Lukas

Abstract

How can professionals tasked with innovation navigate institutional complexity in hybrid organizations without contesting the various institutionalized expectations about what constitutes appropriate and beneficial new ideas? This article investigates this question through an ethnographic study of pharmaceutical professionals tasked with research and development at an internationally operating life science company producing pharmaceutical innovations. There, pharmaceutical professionals must address and satisfy three institutional demands to project legitimacy of their new ideas: (1) scientific validity expected by leading members of their profession; (2) commercial value demanded by management; and (3) legal responsibility enforced by state agencies. Facing the challenge of creating legitimate novelty opposite these competing institutional demands, the pharmaceutical professionals initially design new ideas to primarily meet the jurisdictional control exerted by key opinion leaders in the field of clinical pharmacology. Yet, the resultant scientifically tailored designs regularly conflict with the institutional demands enforced by other powerful institutional referents within their organization. To resolve this issue, the professionals utilize a strategy of subversion to undermine the power and authority of these powerful referents by employing tactics of withdraw, manipulation, collusion, and ambushing. Based on these findings, the present study contributes to institutional theory and to literature on creativity and innovation management by theorizing subversive ingenuity as a distinct strategy professionals employ to navigate competing institutional demands during innovation processes in hybrid organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vogelgsang, Lukas, 2022. "‘When creativity gets you fired—why professionals tasked with innovation employ subversion when facing competing institutional demands in hybrid organizations’," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:253378
    DOI: 10.1093/jpo/joac004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/253378/1/joac004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1093/jpo/joac004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tammar B. Zilber, 2011. "Institutional Multiplicity in Practice: A Tale of Two High-Tech Conferences in Israel," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    2. Andersson, Thomas & Gadolin, Christian, 2020. "Understanding institutional work through social interaction in highly institutionalized settings: Lessons from public healthcare organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard Leca & Charles-Clemens Rüling & Dominique Puthod, 2015. "Animated Times: Critical Transitions and the Maintenance of Field-Configuring Events," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01280882, HAL.
    2. Weinfurtner, Tania & Seidl, David, 2019. "Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organisational space," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    3. Deborah de Lange, 2023. "Sustainable Transportation for the Climate: How Do Transportation Firms Engage in Cooperative Public-Private Partnerships?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Jennifer Brenton & Natalie Slawinski, 2023. "Collaborating for Community Regeneration: Facilitating Partnerships in, Through, and for Place," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 815-834, May.
    5. Hannigan, Timothy R. & Briggs, Anthony R. & Valadao, Rodrigo & Seidel, Marc-David L. & Jennings, P. Devereaux, 2022. "A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging AI entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    6. Emmanuel Kumi & Tara Saharan, 2022. "Hybridisation of institutional logics and civil society organisations' advocacy in Kenya," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(4), pages 245-255, October.
    7. Mélissa Boudes, 2019. "Labour transformation and institutional re-arrangement in France : a preliminary study of a business and employment cooperative," Post-Print hal-02264849, HAL.
    8. Nicola Mountford & Susi Geiger, 2021. "Markets and institutional fields: foundational concepts and a research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 290-303, December.
    9. Neva Bojovic & Valérie Sabatier & Emmanuel Coblence, 2019. "Becoming Through Doing: How Experimental Spaces Enable Organizational Identity Work," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-02376220, HAL.
    10. Bernard Leca & Charles-Clemens Rüling & Dominique Puthod, 2015. "Animated Times: Critical Transitions and the Maintenance of Field-Configuring Events," Post-Print hal-01280882, HAL.
    11. Silke Bucher & Ann Langley, 2016. "The Interplay of Reflective and Experimental Spaces in Interrupting and Reorienting Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 594-613, June.
    12. Carson, Lindsey D. & Prado, Mariana Mota, 2016. "Using institutional multiplicity to address corruption as a collective action problem: Lessons from the Brazilian case," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 56-65.
    13. Welter, Friederike & Smallbone, David, 2015. "Creative forces for entrepreneurship: The role of institutional change agents," Working Papers 01/15, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    14. Andreea Gorbatai & Cyrus Dioun & Kisha Lashley, 2021. "Making Space for Emotions: Empathy, Contagion, and Legitimacy’s Double-Edged Sword," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 42-63, January.
    15. Graben Sari, 2016. "Nested Regulation in Law and Development: Identifying Sites of Indigenous Resistance and Reform," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 233-268, December.
    16. Louise Yngve, 2022. "Individual Actors Coping with Institutional Complexity Within a State-civil Society Partnership: The Role of Sensemaking," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1237-1255, December.
    17. Alfano, Vincenzo & Ercolano, Salvatore, 2021. "Social capital, quality of institutions and lockdown. Evidence from Italian provinces," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 31-41.
    18. Zilber, Tammar B., 2015. "Turning a disadvantage into a resource: Working at the periphery," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 423-430.
    19. Neva Bojovic & Valérie Sabatier & Emmanuel Coblence, 2019. "Becoming Through Doing: How Experimental Spaces Enable Organizational Identity Work," Post-Print halshs-02376220, HAL.
    20. Zhichang Zhu, 2018. "Institutional change and strategic choice: debating the ‘stage-model’ of strategy in emerging economies," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 371-388, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:253378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.