IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/216890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entgrenzung in der digitalen Onlinearbeit am Beispiel von Crowdwork

Author

Listed:
  • Gerber, Christine
  • Krzywdzinski, Martin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerber, Christine & Krzywdzinski, Martin, 2019. "Entgrenzung in der digitalen Onlinearbeit am Beispiel von Crowdwork," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 25-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:216890
    DOI: 10.5771/9783845296159-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/216890/1/Full-text-chapter-Gerber-et-al-Entgrenzung-in-der.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/9783845296159-25?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Gandini, 2016. "The Reputation Economy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-56107-7.
    2. Leimeister, Jan Marco & Zogaj, Shkodran, 2013. "Neue Arbeitsorganisation durch Crowdsourcing: Eine Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 287, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    3. Siou Chew Kuek & Cecilia Paradi-Guilford & Toks Fayomi & Saori Imaizumi & Panos Ipeirotis & Patricia Pina & Manpreet Singh, 2015. "The Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing," World Bank Publications - Reports 22284, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helfen, Markus & Wirth, Carsten, 2020. "Management von Arbeit in pluralen Netzwerkorganisationen: Trends, Deutungen und Handlungsoptionen," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 185, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerber, Christine & Krzywdzinski, Martin, 2019. "Brave New Digital Work? New Forms of Performance Control in Crowdwork," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 121-143.
    2. Andrey SHEVCHUK & Denis STREBKOV, 2023. "Digital platforms and the changing freelance workforce in the Russian Federation: A ten‐year perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez Macias, 2019. "Digital Labour Platforms in Europe: Numbers, Profiles, and Employment Status of Platform Workers," JRC Research Reports JRC117330, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Christine Mayrhuber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein, 2018. "Digitalisierung und soziale Sicherheit," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 91(12), pages 891-897, December.
    5. Jennifer Sin Hung von Zumbusch & Lidija Lalicic, 2020. "The role of co-living spaces in digital nomads’ well-being," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 439-453, September.
    6. Mariann Hardey, 2020. "Gender and Technology Culture: Points of Contact in Tech Cities," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(1), pages 101-118, March.
    7. Christian Stummer & Dennis Kundisch & Reinhold Decker, 2018. "Platform Launch Strategies," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(2), pages 167-173, April.
    8. Chiara Belletti & Daniel Erdsiek & Ulrich Laitenberger & Paola Tubaro, 2021. "Crowdworking in France and Germany," Working Papers hal-03468022, HAL.
    9. Kässi, Otto & Lehdonvirta, Vili & Stephany, Fabian, 2021. "How Many Online Workers are there in the World? A Data-Driven Assessment," SocArXiv 78nge, Center for Open Science.
    10. Braesemann, Fabian & Stephany, Fabian & Teutloff, Ole & Kässi, Otto & Graham, Mark & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2021. "The polarisation of remote work," SocArXiv q8a96, Center for Open Science.
    11. Daniyar T. Baitenizov & Igor N. Dubina & David F. J. Campbell & Elias G. Carayannis & Tolkyn A. Azatbek, 2019. "Freelance as a Creative Mode of Self-employment in a New Economy (a Literature Review)," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Kässi, Otto & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2018. "Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 241-248.
    13. Soriano, Cheryll Ruth, 2022. "Class formation and relations among Filipino cloudworkers," MediArXiv p8kjf, Center for Open Science.
    14. Melia, Elvis, 2020. "African jobs in the digital era: Export options with a focus on online labour," IDOS Discussion Papers 3/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    15. Viola Muster & Ulf Schrader & Susanne Blazejewski & Martina Schäfer & Anke Buhl & Christoph Harrach & Marc Schmidt-Keilich & Elisabeth Süßbauer, 2016. "Integration von Mitarbeitern als Konsumenten in Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationsprozesse," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 417-421, December.
    16. DILI Ramces & BUNCAD Yve Joerella & PEREZ Yveth Jasmin, 2022. "Bpo Industry In Achieving Socio-Economic Development Inclusiveness And Local Governance In The Philippines," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 22-26, December.
    17. Jennifer Sin Hung von Zumbusch & Lidija Lalicic, 0. "The role of co-living spaces in digital nomads’ well-being," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    18. Martin Lukac & André Grow, 2021. "Reputation systems and recruitment in online labor markets: insights from an agent-based model," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 207-229, May.
    19. Luís Valadares Tavares & Pedro Arruda, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria Model to Evaluate Public Services Contracts," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-85, March.
    20. Chris Warhurst & Wil Hunt, 2019. "The Digitalisation of Future Work and Employment. Possible impact and policy responses," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-05, Joint Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:216890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.