IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v183y2020i3p216-234.html

Research Note: Governance Indicators Explain Discrepancies in COVID‐19 Data

Author

Listed:
  • Omer F. Baris
  • Riccardo Pelizzo

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is neutral. It does not discriminate: the outbreak affects all countries. Yet, countries with better governance detect and report COVID‐19 cases an average of 34 days earlier than countries with low governance scores. They also report a significantly higher number of cases, and more deaths but lower death‐per‐case ratios. Analyzing the statistical relationship between the good governance indicators devised by the World Bank with data pertaining to COVID‐19 (to May 10, 2020), we present some initial yet strong statistical evidence that countries with higher levels of good governance based on the Worldwide Governance Indicators report more (cases, deaths), report earlier, and are more effective at reducing fatalities. These findings remain robust after controlling for population size, population density, old‐age population, and the number of tourist arrivals. Countries with better governance are more successful in treating the disease and in reducing its deadliness. Good governance matters. El coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SARS‐CoV‐2) es neutral. No discrimina: el brote afecta a todos los países. Sin embargo, los países con mejor gobernanza detectan e informan casos de COVID‐19 34 días antes que los países con puntajes bajos de gobernanza. También informan un número significativamente mayor de casos, más muertes pero menores proporciones de muertes por caso. Analizando la relación estadística entre los indicadores de buena gobernanza ideados por el Banco Mundial con datos relacionados con COVID‐19, encontramos pruebas sólidas de que los países con niveles más altos de buena gobernanza basados en los Indicadores de Gobernanza Mundial informan más (casos, muertes), informan antes, y son más efectivos para reducir las muertes. Estos hallazgos siguen siendo sólidos después de controlar el tamaño de la población, la densidad de población, la población de ancianos y el número de llegadas de turistas. Los países con una mejor gobernanza tienen mayor éxito en el tratamiento de la enfermedad y también en la reducción de su mortalidad. El buen gobierno importa. 严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS‐CoV‐2)是中立的。它是同一种病毒并且不偏好任何群体: 病毒爆发对所有国家造成影响。然而, 治理效果更佳的国家比治理分数较低的国家提早34天探测并报道COVID‐19案例。前者报道的案例数量也显著更高, 死亡人数更多, 但死亡率较低。即使将人口数量、人口密度、老年人口、到访旅客数量考虑在内, 这些研究发现仍然是稳健的。治理效果更佳的国家在治疗该疾病、减少其致死率方面更为成功。善治很重要。

Suggested Citation

  • Omer F. Baris & Riccardo Pelizzo, 2020. "Research Note: Governance Indicators Explain Discrepancies in COVID‐19 Data," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 183(3), pages 216-234, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:216-234
    DOI: 10.1177/0043820020945683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020945683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0043820020945683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaufmann, Daniel & Kraay, Aart & Mastruzzi, Massimo, 2007. "The worldwide governance indicators project : answering the critics," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4149, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Harakan & Riccardo Pelizzo & Nygmetzhan Kuzenbayev, 2023. "Traditional Beliefs And Electoral Behavior In Indonesia," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 186(4), pages 896-924, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Richards, 2013. "Diplomacy, Trade and Aid: Searching for "Synergies"," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 394, November.
    2. Omar Jraid Mustafa Alhanaqtah & Veronika Vladimir Alexey Alhanaqtah, 2018. "Governance Indicators for Strategic Business Decisions: Diversity of Western Asian Countries in Terms of Democracy," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(3), pages 378-393, March.
    3. Vikrant Shirodkar & Palitha Konara, 2017. "Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets: Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 179-207, April.
    4. Calá, Carla Daniela & Arauzo Carod, Josep Maria & Manjón Antolín, Miguel C., 2015. "The Determinants of Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries," Working Papers 2072/246964, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    5. Shamugia, Egnate, 2025. "Rule of law and economic performance: A meta-regression analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Andrews, Matthew, 2008. "Are One-Best-Way Models of Effective Government Suitable for Developing Countries?," Working Paper Series rwp08-014, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    7. Stefan Voigt, 2011. "Positive constitutional economics II—a survey of recent developments," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 205-256, January.
    8. Khurshid Djalilov & Jens Hölscher, 2016. "Comparative Analyses Of The Banking Environment In Transition Countries," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 61(208), pages 7-26, January -.
    9. Nansikombi, Hellen & Fischer, Richard & Ferrer Velasco, Rubén & Lippe, Melvin & Kalaba, Felix Kanungwe & Kabwe, Gillian & Günter, Sven, 2020. "Can de facto governance influence deforestation drivers in the Zambian Miombo?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Konara, Palitha & Shirodkar, Vikrant, 2018. "Regulatory Institutional Distance and MNCs' Subsidiary Performance: Climbing up Vs. Climbing Down the Institutional Ladder," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 333-347.
    11. Schönfelder, Nina & Wagner, Helmut, 2015. "The impact of European integration on institutional development," MPRA Paper 63392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Balavac, Merima & Pugh, Geoff, 2016. "The link between trade openness, export diversification, institutions and output volatility in transition countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 273-287.
    13. Chun Yang & Bart Bossink & Peter Peverelli, 2018. "The Value of Business–Government Ties for Manufacturing Firms’ Product Innovation during Institutional Transition in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Richards, John & Vining, Aidan R., 2015. "Universal primary education in low-income countries: The contributing role of national governance," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 174-182.
    15. Fernando Martin-Mayoral & María Gabriela Peñaherrera Plúa, 2026. "Governance and inequality in Latin America: is there evidence of an institutional Kuznets curve?," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-39, December.
    16. Anokhin, Sergey & Schulze, William S., 2009. "Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 465-476, September.
    17. Michael Alexeev & Andrey Chernyavskiy, 2019. "The impact of institutional quality on manufacturing sectors in Russia: panel data analysis," CAEPR Working Papers 2019-004, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    18. Rodolphe Desbordes & Gary Koop, 2014. "The known unknowns of governance," Working Papers 1407, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    19. Kresimir Jurlin & Nevenka Cuckovic, 2010. "Comparative analysis of the quality of European institutions 2003-2009: convergence or divergence?," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 34(1), pages 71-98.
    20. Benczes, István & Rezessy, Gergely, 2013. "Governance in Europe, Trends and Fault Lines," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 58(2), pages 133-147.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:216-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.