IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i2p2073-2089.html

Meaningful Measurement of Sustainable Development or Gaming the System? Patterns in Submission to Times Higher Education's Impact Ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon Allan Dickson

Abstract

This research takes a quantitative approach to investigating patterns in submissions to the Times Higher Education's sustainability‐focused Impact Ranking. Testing hypotheses developed from the quantification, rankings, and disclosures literatures, this research provides a first‐of‐its‐kind longitudinal exploration into the Impact Rankings to understand the shape that submissions take along two categories: universities' responses to previous submissions and universities' own characteristics. The study finds that the universities that submit the most sustainable development goals tend to have larger student populations and score higher. It also finds that universities do not seem to target specific high‐scoring goals but rather resubmit the same goals and increase the number of submissions per year. This research will be of interest to researchers in the areas of disclosures, rankings, and higher education, and will also be of interest to practitioners currently working in university offices of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon Allan Dickson, 2026. "Meaningful Measurement of Sustainable Development or Gaming the System? Patterns in Submission to Times Higher Education's Impact Ranking," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 2073-2089, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:2073-2089
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70419
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:2073-2089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.