IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v31y2023i3p1921-1936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing or prioritising for sustainable development? Perceptions of sustainability integration among professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco S. Montesano
  • Frank Biermann
  • Agni Kalfagianni
  • Marjanneke J. Vijge

Abstract

The effective integration of the environmental with the economic and social dimensions of sustainability will only succeed when the core problem perceptions of professionals in these fields adjust as well. Yet, while sustainability integration in general has been thoroughly researched, few studies have analysed the specific role of subjective understandings among professionals. This article bridges this gap by asking how professionals understand and operationalise sustainability integration. Which factors shape their perceptions and practices? We present the results of an online survey that was circulated to a diverse sample of professionals and then analysed using statistical methods. Responses from 508 participants show that sustainability integration is mostly perceived as a balance across all three sustainability dimensions rather than a hierarchy with the environment at its basis. However, perceptions also vary significantly across professional and geographical contexts. This signifies the need to better account for how individual circumstances affect processes of integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco S. Montesano & Frank Biermann & Agni Kalfagianni & Marjanneke J. Vijge, 2023. "Balancing or prioritising for sustainable development? Perceptions of sustainability integration among professionals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1921-1936, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:1921-1936
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2493
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheera Haroon & Muhammad Wasif & Rameez Khalid & Sana Khalidi, 2021. "Supply Chain Practitioners’ Perception on Sustainability: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Williams, Michael C., 2004. "Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(4), pages 633-665, October.
    3. Jale Tosun & Achim Lang, 2017. "Policy integration: mapping the different concepts," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 553-570, November.
    4. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    5. Yee, Albert S., 1996. "The causal effects of ideas on policies," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 69-108, January.
    6. Barnett, Michael N. & Finnemore, Martha, 1999. "The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 699-732, October.
    7. Bob Giddings & Bill Hopwood & Geoff O'Brien, 2002. "Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 187-196.
    8. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    9. Geels, Frank W., 2004. "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 897-920, September.
    10. Ingrid Boas & Frank Biermann & Norichika Kanie, 2016. "Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 449-464, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2020. "Beyond COVID-19: Applying “SDG logics” for resilient transformations," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 451-464, December.
    2. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Tao Liang & Dong Zhao & Tao Wang & Xingbin Chen, 2022. "A heterogeneous decision criteria system evaluating sustainable infrastructure development: From the lens of multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 556-579, August.
    3. Jose Cuesta & Lucia Madrigal & Natalia Pecorari, 2024. "Social sustainability, poverty and income: An empirical exploration," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 1789-1816, April.
    4. Brennan, Michael & Rondón-Sulbarán, Janeet, 2019. "Transdisciplinary research: Exploring impact, knowledge and quality in the early stages of a sustainable development project," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 481-491.
    5. Ebun Akinsete & Phoebe Koundouri & Conrad Landis, 2021. "Integrated Approach for Sustainable WEF Nexus Management: An African Case," DEOS Working Papers 2115, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    6. Judith Janker & Stefan Mann, 2020. "Understanding the social dimension of sustainability in agriculture: a critical review of sustainability assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1671-1691, March.
    7. Pekka Halla & Albert Merino‐Saum, 2022. "Conceptual frameworks in indicator‐based assessments of urban sustainability—An analysis based on 67 initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1056-1071, October.
    8. Latoszek Ewa, 2021. "Fostering sustainable development through the European Digital Single Market," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 68-89, March.
    9. Eleni Sinakou & Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Peter Van Petegem, 2019. "Exploring the concept of sustainable development within education for sustainable development: implications for ESD research and practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Stefan Schaltegger & Derk Loorbach & Jacob Hörisch, 2023. "Managing entrepreneurial and corporate contributions to sustainability transitions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 891-902, February.
    11. Alexandra E. Ioannou & Chrysi S. Laspidou, 2023. "Cross-Mapping Important Interactions between Water-Energy-Food Nexus Indices and the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Maya Bogers & Frank Biermann & Agni Kalfagianni & Rakhyun E. Kim, 2023. "The SDGs as integrating force in global governance? Challenges and opportunities," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 157-164, June.
    13. Basil Bornemann & Sabine Weiland, 2021. "The UN 2030 Agenda and the Quest for Policy Integration: A Literature Review," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 96-107.
    14. Holden, Erling & Linnerud, Kristin & Rygg, Bente Johnsen, 2021. "A review of dominant sustainable energy narratives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Shankar Sankaran & Mattias Jacobsson & Tomas Blomquist, 2021. "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 696-714, October.
    16. Çağlar Kıvanç Kaymaz & Salih Birinci & Yusuf Kızılkan, 2022. "Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2986-3012, March.
    17. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    18. Baptista, Idalina & Plananska, Jana, 2017. "The landscape of energy initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa: Going for systemic change or reinforcing the status quo?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Mariia Kostetckaia & Markus Hametner, 2022. "How Sustainable Development Goals interlinkages influence European Union countries’ progress towards the 2030 Agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 916-926, October.
    20. Tahvanainen, Veera & Laakkonen, Anu & Pesälä, Ossi & Pittaluga, Lucía & Hujala, Teppo & Pykäläinen, Jouni, 2024. "Pulp addiction? Perspectives of local regime actors on the development of the growing pulp industry in Uruguay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:1921-1936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.