IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v36y2016i3p482-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transport and Lairage Model for Salmonella Transmission Between Pigs Applicable to EU Member States

Author

Listed:
  • R. R. L. Simons
  • A. A. Hill
  • A. Swart
  • L. Kelly
  • E. L. Snary

Abstract

A model for the transmission of Salmonella between finisher pigs during transport to the abattoir and subsequent lairage has been developed, including novel factors such as environmental contamination and the effect of stress, and is designed to be adaptable for any EU Member State (MS). The model forms part of a generic farm‐to‐consumption model for Salmonella in pigs, designed to model potentially important risk factors and assess the effectiveness of interventions. In this article, we discuss the parameterization of the model for two case study MSs. For both MSs, the model predicted an increase in the average MS‐level prevalence of Salmonella‐positive pigs during both transport and lairage, accounting for a large amount of the variation between reported on‐farm prevalence and reported lymph‐node prevalence at the slaughterhouse. Sensitivity analysis suggested that stress is the most important factor during transport, while a number of factors, including environmental contamination and the dose‐response parameters, are important during lairage. There was wide variation in the model‐predicted change in prevalence in individual batches; while the majority of batches (80–90%) had no increase, in some batches the increase in prevalence was over 70% and in some cases infection was introduced into previously uninfected batches of pigs. Thus, the model suggests that while the transport and lairage stages of the farm‐to‐consumption exposure pathway are unlikely to be responsible for a large increase in average prevalence at the MS level, they can have a large effect on prevalence at an individual‐batch level.

Suggested Citation

  • R. R. L. Simons & A. A. Hill & A. Swart & L. Kelly & E. L. Snary, 2016. "A Transport and Lairage Model for Salmonella Transmission Between Pigs Applicable to EU Member States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 482-497, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:3:p:482-497
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12390
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    2. Sumeet R. Patil & H. Christopher Frey, 2004. "Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods Based on Applications to a Food Safety Risk Assessment Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 573-585, June.
    3. van der Gaag, Monique A. & Vos, Fred & Saatkamp, Helmut W. & van Boven, Michiel & van Beek, Paul & Huirne, Ruud B. M., 2004. "A state-transition simulation model for the spread of Salmonella in the pork supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 782-798, August.
    4. H. Scott Hurd & Claes Enøe & Lene Sørensen & Henrik Wachman & Steven M. Corns & Kenneth M. Bryden & Matthias Grenier, 2008. "Risk‐Based Analysis of the Danish Pork Salmonella Program: Past and Future," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 341-351, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    2. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2006. "Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1349-1361, October.
    3. C. L. Smith & E. Borgonovo, 2007. "Decision Making During Nuclear Power Plant Incidents—A New Approach to the Evaluation of Precursor Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1027-1042, August.
    4. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    5. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.
    6. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2008. "Epistemic Uncertainty in the Ranking and Categorization of Probabilistic Safety Assessment Model Elements: Issues and Findings," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 983-1001, August.
    7. A. N. Swart & F. van Leusden & M. J. Nauta, 2016. "A QMRA Model for Salmonella in Pork Products During Preparation and Consumption," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 516-530, March.
    8. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2008. "Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output with Input Constraints: A Generalized Rationale for Local Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 667-680, June.
    9. Elmar Plischke & Emanuele Borgonovo, 2020. "Fighting the Curse of Sparsity: Probabilistic Sensitivity Measures From Cumulative Distribution Functions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2639-2660, December.
    10. Amir Mokhtari & David Oryang & Yuhuan Chen & Regis Pouillot & Jane Van Doren, 2018. "A Mathematical Model for Pathogen Cross‐Contamination Dynamics during the Postharvest Processing of Leafy Greens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1718-1737, August.
    11. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    12. Esteve Nadal-Roig & Lluís Miquel Plà-Aragonès & Víctor Manuel Albornoz, 2023. "Supply Chains: Planning the Transportation of Animals among Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Chu-Agor, M.L. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Kiker, G.A. & Aiello-Lammens, M.E. & Akçakaya, H.R. & Convertino, M. & Linkov, I., 2012. "Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 33-47.
    14. Fouladvand, Javanshir & Aranguren Rojas, Maria & Hoppe, Thomas & Ghorbani, Amineh, 2022. "Simulating thermal energy community formation: Institutional enablers outplaying technological choice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    15. Elaine O Nsoesie & Richard J Beckman & Madhav V Marathe, 2012. "Sensitivity Analysis of an Individual-Based Model for Simulation of Influenza Epidemics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Ping Wu & Yifan Xu, 2014. "An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 698-710, April.
    17. Jose Luiz F. Barbosa & Antonio P. Coimbra & Dan Simon & Wesley P. Calixto, 2022. "Optimization Process Applied in the Thermal and Luminous Design of High Power LED Luminaires," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Andrew A. Hill & Robin R. L. Simons & Louise Kelly & Emma L. Snary, 2016. "A Farm Transmission Model for Salmonella in Pigs, Applicable to E.U. Member States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 461-481, March.
    19. Carla L. Simões & Ricardo Simoes & Ana Sofia Gonçalves & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Retno Agustarini & Yetti Heryati & Yelin Adalina & Wahyu Catur Adinugroho & Dhany Yuniati & Rizki Ary Fambayun & Gerhard Eli Sabastian & Asep Hidayat & Hesti Lestari Tata & William Ingram & Aulia Perd, 2022. "The Development of Indigofera spp. as a Source of Natural Dyes to Increase Community Incomes on Timor Island, Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:3:p:482-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.