IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v68y2021i1p134-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appointment scheduling at a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic using stochastic programming

Author

Listed:
  • Youngbum Hur
  • Jonathan F. Bard
  • Douglas J. Morrice

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the problem of constructing an appointment template for scheduling patients at a specific type of multidisciplinary outpatient clinic called an integrated practice unit (IPU). The focus is on developing and solving a stochastic optimization model for a back pain IPU in the face of random arrivals, an uncertain patient mix, and variable service times. The deterministic version of the problem is modeled as a mixed integer program with the objective of minimizing a weighted combination of clinic closing time (duration) and total patient waiting time (length of stay). A two‐stage stochastic program is then derived to account for the randomness and the sequential nature of the decisions. Although it was not possible to solve the two‐stage problem for even a limited number of scenarios, the wait‐and‐see (WS) problem was sufficiently tractable to provide a lower bound on the stochastic solution. The introduction of valid inequalities, limiting indices, and the use of special ordered sets helped to speed up the computations. A greedy heuristic was also developed to obtain solutions much more quickly. Out of practical considerations, it was necessary to develop appointment templates with time slots at fixed intervals, which are not available from the WS solution. The first to be derived was the expected value (EV) template that is used to find the expected value of the EV solution (EEV). This solution provides an upper bound on the objective function value of the two‐stage stochastic program. The average gap between the EEV and WS solutions was 18%. Results from extensive computational testing are presented for the EV template and for our adaptation of three other templates found in the literature. Depending on the relative importance of the two objective function metrics, the results demonstrate the trade‐off that exists between them. For the templates investigated, the “closing time” ranged from an average of 235 to 275 minutes for a 300‐minute session, while the corresponding “total patient time in clinic” ranged from 80 to 71 minutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngbum Hur & Jonathan F. Bard & Douglas J. Morrice, 2021. "Appointment scheduling at a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic using stochastic programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 134-155, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:68:y:2021:i:1:p:134-155
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21895
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Dobson & Tolga Tezcan & Vera Tilson, 2013. "Optimal Workflow Decisions for Investigators in Systems with Interruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1125-1141, May.
    2. S. Ayca Erdogan & Alexander Gose & Brian T. Denton, 2015. "Online appointment sequencing and scheduling," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 1267-1286, November.
    3. Soroush Saghafian & Wallace J. Hopp & Mark P. Van Oyen & Jeffrey S. Desmond & Steven L. Kronick, 2014. "Complexity-Augmented Triage: A Tool for Improving Patient Safety and Operational Efficiency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 329-345, July.
    4. Hyun-Jung Alvarez-Oh & Hari Balasubramanian & Ekin Koker & Ana Muriel, 2018. "Stochastic Appointment Scheduling in a Team Primary Care Practice with Two Flexible Nurses and Two Dedicated Providers," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 241-260, September.
    5. Eun-Seok Kim & Marc Posner, 2010. "Parallel machine scheduling with s-precedence constraints," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 525-537.
    6. Pengfei Zhang & Jonathan F. Bard & Douglas J. Morrice & Karl M. Koenig, 2019. "Extended open shop scheduling with resource constraints: Appointment scheduling for integrated practice units," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(10), pages 1037-1060, October.
    7. Camilo Mancilla & Robert Storer, 2012. "A sample average approximation approach to stochastic appointment sequencing and scheduling," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 655-670.
    8. Van-Anh Truong, 2015. "Optimal Advance Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1584-1597, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongyang Wang & Kumar Muthuraman & Douglas Morrice, 2019. "Coordinated Patient Appointment Scheduling for a Multistation Healthcare Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 599-618, May.
    2. Maria R. Ibanez & Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2018. "Discretionary Task Ordering: Queue Management in Radiological Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4389-4407, September.
    3. Tito Homem-de-Mello & Qingxia Kong & Rodrigo Godoy-Barba, 2022. "A Simulation Optimization Approach for the Appointment Scheduling Problem with Decision-Dependent Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2845-2865, September.
    4. Michael F. Kamali & Tolga Tezcan & Ozlem Yildiz, 2019. "When to Use Provider Triage in Emergency Departments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1003-1019, March.
    5. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2018. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 7-26, January.
    6. Nur Banu Demir & Serhat Gul & Melih Çelik, 2021. "A stochastic programming approach for chemotherapy appointment scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 112-133, February.
    7. Zhou, Shenghai & Li, Debiao & Yin, Yong, 2021. "Coordinated appointment scheduling with multiple providers and patient-and-physician matching cost in specialty care," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Gabriel Zayas-Cabán & Jingui Xie & Linda V. Green & Mark E. Lewis, 2016. "Dynamic control of a tandem system with abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 279-293, December.
    9. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    10. Kuang Xu & Carri W. Chan, 2016. "Using Future Information to Reduce Waiting Times in the Emergency Department via Diversion," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 314-331, July.
    11. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    12. Wu, Xueqi & Zhou, Shenghai, 2022. "Sequencing and scheduling appointments on multiple servers with stochastic service durations and customer arrivals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Junfei Huang & Boaz Carmeli & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2015. "Control of Patient Flow in Emergency Departments, or Multiclass Queues with Deadlines and Feedback," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 892-908, August.
    14. Christos Zacharias & Michael Pinedo, 2017. "Managing Customer Arrivals in Service Systems with Multiple Identical Servers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 639-656, October.
    15. Yichuan Ding & Eric Park & Mahesh Nagarajan & Eric Grafstein, 2019. "Patient Prioritization in Emergency Department Triage Systems: An Empirical Study of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 723-741, October.
    16. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2017. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 882-900, March.
    17. Christos Zacharias & Mor Armony, 2017. "Joint Panel Sizing and Appointment Scheduling in Outpatient Care," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3978-3997, November.
    18. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović, 2017. "Personalized queues: the customer view, via a fluid model of serving least-patient first," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 23-53, October.
    19. Michael Freeman & Susan Robinson & Stefan Scholtes, 2021. "Gatekeeping, Fast and Slow: An Empirical Study of Referral Errors in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4209-4232, July.
    20. Miao Bai & Bjorn Berg & Esra Sisikoglu Sir & Mustafa Y. Sir, 2023. "Partially partitioned templating strategies for outpatient specialty practices," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 301-318, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:68:y:2021:i:1:p:134-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.