IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v84y2016i3d10.1007_s11134-016-9489-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic control of a tandem system with abandonments

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Zayas-Cabán

    (University of Michigan)

  • Jingui Xie

    (University of Science and Technology of China)

  • Linda V. Green

    (Columbia University)

  • Mark E. Lewis

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to provide a model that is an extension of classic scheduling problems for a tandem queueing system by including customer impatience. In such scenarios, the server(s) must balance abandonments from each phase of service with the need to prioritize higher reward customers. This presents an interesting challenge since the trade-off between the cost of abandonments and revenue maximization is not at all clear. As a result of customer abandonments, traditional solution techniques are not available. In particular, uniformization is not possible since the transition rates are unbounded. We do our analysis in continuous time, using the continuous-time Markov decision process framework to discern simple relationships of the value functions depending on the starting state. We then use sample path arguments to analyze the structure of the optimal policy. We provide conditions under which an optimal policy is nonidling and never splits servers (except to avoid idling). We then consider the single-server model as a proxy for the decision problem when there are more customers at each station than there are servers. In this case, we provide conditions under which it is optimal to prioritize each station.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Zayas-Cabán & Jingui Xie & Linda V. Green & Mark E. Lewis, 2016. "Dynamic control of a tandem system with abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 279-293, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:84:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-016-9489-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-016-9489-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-016-9489-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-016-9489-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Dobson & Tolga Tezcan & Vera Tilson, 2013. "Optimal Workflow Decisions for Investigators in Systems with Interruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1125-1141, May.
    2. Soroush Saghafian & Wallace J. Hopp & Mark P. Van Oyen & Jeffrey S. Desmond & Steven L. Kronick, 2014. "Complexity-Augmented Triage: A Tool for Improving Patient Safety and Operational Efficiency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 329-345, July.
    3. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2003. "Dynamic Server Allocation for Queueing Networks with Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 952-968, December.
    4. Rosser T. Nelson, 1966. "Labor Assignment as a Dynamic Control Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 369-376, June.
    5. Izak Duenyas & Diwakar Gupta & Tava Lennon Olsen, 1998. "Control of a Single-Server Tandem Queueing System with Setups," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 218-230, April.
    6. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2005. "Throughput Maximization for Tandem Lines with Two Stations and Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 516-531, June.
    7. Junfei Huang & Boaz Carmeli & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2015. "Control of Patient Flow in Emergency Departments, or Multiclass Queues with Deadlines and Feedback," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 892-908, August.
    8. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2001. "Server Assignment Policies for Maximizing the Steady-State Throughput of Finite Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1421-1439, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sina Ansari & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Qifeng Shao, 2019. "Optimal control policies in service systems with limited information on the downstream stage," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(5), pages 367-392, August.
    2. Hayriye Ayhan, 2022. "Server assignment policies in queues with customer abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 393-395, April.
    3. Gabriel Zayas-Cabán & Mark E. Lewis, 2020. "Admission control in a two-class loss system with periodically varying parameters and abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 175-210, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2010. "Robustness of efficient server assignment policies to service time distributions in finite‐buffered lines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(6), pages 563-582, September.
    2. Yi‐Chun Tsai & Nilay Tanık Argon, 2008. "Dynamic server assignment policies for assembly‐type queues with flexible servers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 234-251, April.
    3. Peng Wang & Kai Pan & Zhenzhen Yan & Yun Fong Lim, 2022. "Managing Stochastic Bucket Brigades on Discrete Work Stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 358-373, January.
    4. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2012. "Flexible Servers in Understaffed Tandem Lines," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 761-777, July.
    5. Yun Fong Lim & Bingnan Lu & Rowan Wang & Wenjia Zhang, 2020. "Flexibly Serving A Finite Number of Heterogeneous Jobs in A Tandem System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1431-1447, June.
    6. Gregory Dobson & Tolga Tezcan & Vera Tilson, 2013. "Optimal Workflow Decisions for Investigators in Systems with Interruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1125-1141, May.
    7. Legros, Benjamin & Jouini, Oualid & Akşin, O. Zeynep & Koole, Ger, 2020. "Front-office multitasking between service encounters and back-office tasks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 946-963.
    8. Aili (Alice) Zou & Douglas G. Down, 2018. "Asymptotically Maximal Throughput in Tandem Systems with Flexible and Dedicated Servers," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2007. "Compensating for Failures with Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 753-768, August.
    10. Ramesh Arumugam & Maria Mayorga & Kevin Taaffe, 2009. "Inventory based allocation policies for flexible servers in serial systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Eugene Furman & Adam Diamant & Murat Kristal, 2021. "Customer Acquisition and Retention: A Fluid Approach for Staffing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4236-4257, November.
    12. S.M.R. Iravani & J.A. Buzacott & M.J.M. Posner, 2005. "A robust policy for serial agile production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 58-73, February.
    13. Tuğçe Işık & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2022. "Dynamic Control of Non‐Collaborative Workers When Reassignment Is Costly," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1332-1352, March.
    14. Tuğçe Işık & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2016. "Optimal control of queueing systems with non-collaborating servers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 79-110, October.
    15. Down, Douglas G. & Karakostas, George, 2008. "Maximizing throughput in queueing networks with limited flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 98-112, May.
    16. Yichuan Ding & Eric Park & Mahesh Nagarajan & Eric Grafstein, 2019. "Patient Prioritization in Emergency Department Triage Systems: An Empirical Study of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 723-741, October.
    17. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2017. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 882-900, March.
    18. Gregory Dobson & Hsiao-Hui Lee & Arvind Sainathan & Vera Tilson, 2012. "A Queueing Model to Evaluate the Impact of Patient "Batching" on Throughput and Flow Time in a Medical Teaching Facility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 584-599, October.
    19. Emmett J. Lodree & Nezih Altay & Robert A. Cook, 2019. "Staff assignment policies for a mass casualty event queuing network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 411-442, December.
    20. Carmen, Raïsa & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Van Houdt, Benny, 2018. "Inpatient boarding in emergency departments: Impact on patient delays and system capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 953-967.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:84:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-016-9489-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.