IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v42y1995i6p915-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The single period procurement problem where dedicated supplier capacity can be reserved

Author

Listed:
  • Karuna Jain
  • Edward A. Silver

Abstract

In this article we consider the single period procurement strategy for an item with uncertainty in its demand and uncertainty in the capacity of the supplier. Dedicated capacity can be ensured by paying a premium charge to the supplier. The other decision variable is the replenishment quantity to request. It turns out to be very easy to select the best value of this latter quantity. On the other hand, we are only able to characterize the general behavior of the expected profit as a function of the level of dedicated capacity. In general, there can be multiple local maxima as a function of the dedicated capacity. However, for the special, but important, case of normally distributed demand, normally distributed capacity and a linear cost for reserving capacity, an algorithm is developed for finding the best level of dedicated capacity. Some preliminary insights regarding the extension to multiple periods are presented. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Karuna Jain & Edward A. Silver, 1995. "The single period procurement problem where dedicated supplier capacity can be reserved," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(6), pages 915-934, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:42:y:1995:i:6:p:915-934
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199509)42:63.0.CO;2-M
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199509)42:63.0.CO;2-M
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199509)42:63.0.CO;2-M?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    2. Ward, SC & Chapman, CB & Klein, JH, 1991. "Theoretical versus applied models: The newsboy problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 197-206.
    3. Frank W. Ciarallo & Ramakrishna Akella & Thomas E. Morton, 1994. "A Periodic Review, Production Planning Model with Uncertain Capacity and Uncertain Demand---Optimality of Extended Myopic Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 320-332, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Papachristos, Ioannis & Pandelis, Dimitrios G., 2022. "Newsvendor models with random supply capacity and backup sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1231-1243.
    2. Ilkyeong Moon & Byung-Hyun Ha & Jongchul Kim, 2012. "Inventory systems with variable capacity," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 68-86.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Ebrahim Arbabian & Hossein Rikhtehgar Berenji, 2023. "Inventory systems with uncertain supplier capacity: an application to covid-19 testing," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 324-344, March.
    2. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    3. Siao-Leu Phouratsamay & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Fanny Pascual, 2021. "Coordination of a two-level supply chain with contracts," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 235-264, June.
    4. Wolosewicz, Cathy & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Aggoune, Riad, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic for an integrated lot-sizing and fixed scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 3-12.
    5. Yan, Xiaoming & Zhang, Minghui & Liu, Ke, 2010. "A note on coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 469-478, September.
    6. Charles, Mehdi & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia & Mazhoud, Issam, 2022. "Motivations and analysis of the capacitated lot-sizing problem with setup times and minimum and maximum ending inventories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 203-220.
    7. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    8. Liu, Tieming, 2008. "Economic lot sizing problem with inventory bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 204-215, February.
    9. Lee, Jinkyu & Bae, Sanghyeon & Kim, Woo Chang & Lee, Yongjae, 2023. "Value function gradient learning for large-scale multistage stochastic programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 321-335.
    10. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2009. "Coordination of pricing and inventory control across products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 175-190, March.
    11. Chakrabarti, T. & Chaudhuri, K. S., 1997. "An EOQ model for deteriorating items with a linear trend in demand and shortages in all cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 205-213, May.
    12. Rossi, Tommaso & Pozzi, Rossella & Testa, Mariapaola, 2017. "EOQ-based inventory management in single-machine multi-item systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 106-113.
    13. Timo Hilger & Florian Sahling & Horst Tempelmeier, 2016. "Capacitated dynamic production and remanufacturing planning under demand and return uncertainty," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(4), pages 849-876, October.
    14. Guerrero, W.J. & Prodhon, C. & Velasco, N. & Amaya, C.A., 2013. "Hybrid heuristic for the inventory location-routing problem with deterministic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 359-370.
    15. Ming Zhao & Minjiao Zhang, 2020. "Multiechelon Lot Sizing: New Complexities and Inequalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 534-551, March.
    16. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    17. Jenny Carolina Saldana Cortés, 2011. "Programación semidefinida aplicada a problemas de cantidad económica de pedido," Documentos CEDE 8735, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    18. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    19. van den Heuvel, Wilco & Gutiérrez, José Miguel & Hwang, Hark-Chin, 2011. "Note on "An efficient approach for solving the lot-sizing problem with time-varying storage capacities"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 455-457, September.
    20. Zhili Zhou & Yongpei Guan, 2013. "Two-stage stochastic lot-sizing problem under cost uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 207-230, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:42:y:1995:i:6:p:915-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.