IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v40y1993i7p905-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the equivalence of jit and mrp as technologies for reducing wastes in manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • John Miltenburg

Abstract

JIT (just‐in‐time) is widely regarded as an excellent tool for reducing costs and cycle times, and for improving quality in manufacturing operations. JIT follows a multistep procedure. First, it identifies and prioritizes wastes or non‐value‐adding activities. Second, it forces these wastes to be removed. MRP (materials requirements planning) can identify the same wastes and prioritize them in the same way that JIT does, by using data from the MRP database and master production schedule, and a waste identification model. In this article, a model is developed which describes the process by which the classic JIT system identifies and prioritizes waste. An equivalent MRP waste identification model is then developed for the production environment of the classic JIT system. (The classic JIT system was developed to produce many products having low to medium volumes.) The results developed here can be extended to other production environments where adaptations of the classic JIT system are used. An example, taken from an actual application, is presented to illustrate the models and the equivalence of JIT and MRP as systems for identifying and prioritizing wastes in manufacturing. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • John Miltenburg, 1993. "On the equivalence of jit and mrp as technologies for reducing wastes in manufacturing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 905-924, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:40:y:1993:i:7:p:905-924
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199312)40:73.0.CO;2-L
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199312)40:73.0.CO;2-L
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199312)40:73.0.CO;2-L?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Luc Deleersnyder & Thom J. Hodgson & Henri Muller-Malek & Peter J. O'Grady, 1989. "Kanban Controlled Pull Systems: An Analytic Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(9), pages 1079-1091, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilhelm, W. E. & Som, Pradip, 1998. "Analysis of a single-stage, single-product, stochastic, MRP-controlled assembly system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 74-93, July.
    2. Alfieri, Arianna & Matta, Andrea, 2012. "Mathematical programming formulations for approximate simulation of multistage production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 773-783.
    3. Kim, Ilhyung & Tang, Christopher S., 1997. "Lead time and response time in a pull production control system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 474-485, September.
    4. Yucesan, Enver & de Groote, Xavier, 2000. "Lead times, order release mechanisms, and customer service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 118-130, January.
    5. Hirakawa, Yasuhiro, 1996. "Performance of a multistage hybrid push/pull production control system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 129-135, June.
    6. Chen-Yang Cheng & Shu-Fen Li & Chia-Leng Lee & Ranon Jientrakul & Chumpol Yuangyai, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Unbalanced Production Lines Using Simulation Modeling: A Case Study for Solar Silicon Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Askin, Ronald G. & Krishnan, Shravan, 2009. "Defining inventory control points in multiproduct stochastic pull systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 418-429, August.
    8. Houmin Yan & Xun Yu Zhou & G. Yin, 1999. "Approximating an Optimal Production Policy in a Continuous Flow Line: Recurrence and Asymptotic Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 535-549, August.
    9. Zhao Xiaobo & Qiguo Gong & Kenichi Nakashima, 2001. "Analysis of a production system in a general configuration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 128-143, March.
    10. Ou, Jihong & Jiang, Jiong, 1997. "Yield comparison of push and pull control methods on production systems with unreliable machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Iwase, Masaharu & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 2011. "The performance evaluation of a multi-stage JIT production system with stochastic demand and production capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 216-222, October.
    12. Mascolo, Maria Di, 1996. "Analysis of a synchronization station for the performance evaluation of a kanban system with a general arrival process of demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 147-163, February.
    13. Ahmadi, Reza H. & Matsuo, Hirofumi, 2000. "A mini-line approach for pull production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 340-358, September.
    14. Huang, Min & Wang, Dingwei & Ip, W. H., 1998. "Simulation study of CONWIP for a cold rolling plant," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 257-266, May.
    15. Venky Nagar & Madhav V. Rajan & Richard Saouma, 2009. "The Incentive Value of Inventory and Cross‐training in Modern Manufacturing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 991-1025, September.
    16. Kojima, Mitsutoshi & Nakashima, Kenichi & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 2008. "Performance evaluation of SCM in JIT environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 439-443, October.
    17. Andijani, A. A., 1998. "A multi-criterion approach for Kanban allocations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 483-493, August.
    18. Subba Rao, S. & Gunasekaran, A. & Goyal, S. K. & Martikainen, T., 1998. "Waiting line model applications in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-28, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:40:y:1993:i:7:p:905-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.