IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v37y1990i1p1-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priority repair and dispatch policies for reparable‐item logistics systems

Author

Listed:
  • David F. Pyke

Abstract

In this article we present the results of a simulation study concerned with reparable electronic equipment on military aircraft. Past studies in the literature have considered priority rules at the repair depot, and one study considered an allocation scheme for distributing repaired items to bases. In this study, we examine the use of a priority rule for sequencing items at a repair depot in conjunction with a priority rule for allocating repaired items to bases. We examine, among other things, the conditions under which it is favorable to consider priority rules. The results indicate that the important variables are the efficiency of the lateral resupply system, the initial allocation of spare stock, and the time it takes to ship items from the depot to bases. The objective throughout is to minimize the expected number of aircraft grounded due to lack of parts.

Suggested Citation

  • David F. Pyke, 1990. "Priority repair and dispatch policies for reparable‐item logistics systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:1:p:1-30
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199002)37:13.0.CO;2-D
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199002)37:13.0.CO;2-D
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199002)37:13.0.CO;2-D?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warren H. Hausman & Gary D. Scudder, 1982. "Priority Scheduling Rules for Repairable Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(11), pages 1215-1232, November.
    2. Warren W. Fisher & J. J. Brennan, 1986. "The performance of cannibalization policies in a maintenance system with spares, repair, and resource constraints," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Gary D. Scudder, 1984. "Priority Scheduling and Spares Stocking Policies for a Repair Shop: The Multiple Failure Case," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 739-749, June.
    4. Gary D. Scudder & Warren H. Hausman, 1982. "Spares stocking policies for repairable items with dependent repair times," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 303-322, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rezaei Somarin, Aghil & Chen, Songlin & Asian, Sobhan & Wang, David Z.W., 2017. "A heuristic stock allocation rule for repairable service parts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 131-140.
    2. Kathryn E. Caggiano & Peter L. Jackson & John A. Muckstadt & James A. Rappold, 2007. "Optimizing Service Parts Inventory in a Multiechelon, Multi-Item Supply Chain with Time-Based Customer Service-Level Agreements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 303-318, April.
    3. Nils Rudi & David F. Pyke & Per Olav Sporsheim, 2000. "Product Recovery at the Norwegian National Insurance Administration," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 166-179, June.
    4. Turan, Hasan Hüseyin & Atmis, Mahir & Kosanoglu, Fuat & Elsawah, Sondoss & Ryan, Michael J., 2020. "A risk-averse simulation-based approach for a joint optimization of workforce capacity, spare part stocks and scheduling priorities in maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Topan, E. & Eruguz, A.S. & Ma, W. & van der Heijden, M.C. & Dekker, R., 2020. "A review of operational spare parts service logistics in service control towers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 401-414.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Topan, E. & Eruguz, A.S. & Ma, W. & van der Heijden, M.C. & Dekker, R., 2020. "A review of operational spare parts service logistics in service control towers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 401-414.
    2. van der Heijden, M.C. & Alvarez, E.M. & Schutten, J.M.J., 2013. "Inventory reduction in spare part networks by selective throughput time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 509-517.
    3. S. Christian Albright & Amit Gupta, 1993. "Steady‐state approximation of a multiechelon multi‐indentured repairable‐item inventory system with a single repair facility," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 479-493, June.
    4. Guide, V. Daniel R. & Srivastava, Rajesh, 1997. "Repairable inventory theory: Models and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Reményi, Christoph & Staudacher, Stephan, 2014. "Systematic simulation based approach for the identification and implementation of a scheduling rule in the aircraft engine maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 94-107.
    6. Kathryn E. Caggiano & John A. Muckstadt & James A. Rappold, 2006. "Integrated Real-Time Capacity and Inventory Allocation for Reparable Service Parts in a Two-Echelon Supply System," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 292-319, August.
    7. Sleptchenko, A. & van der Heijden, M. C. & van Harten, A., 2005. "Using repair priorities to reduce stock investment in spare part networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 733-750, June.
    8. Sang-Hyun Kim & Brian Tomlin, 2013. "Guilt by Association: Strategic Failure Prevention and Recovery Capacity Investments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(7), pages 1631-1649, July.
    9. Zijm, W. Henk & Avsar, Zeynep Muge, 2003. "Capacitated two-indenture models for repairable item systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 573-588, January.
    10. Nasuh Buyukkaramikli & Henny Ooijen & J. Bertrand, 2015. "Integrating inventory control and capacity management at a maintenance service provider," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 185-206, August.
    11. Levner, Eugene & Perlman, Yael & Cheng, T.C.E. & Levner, Ilya, 2011. "A network approach to modeling the multi-echelon spare-part inventory system with backorders and interval-valued demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 43-51, July.
    12. Arts, Joachim, 2017. "A multi-item approach to repairable stocking and expediting in a fluctuating demand environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 102-115.
    13. Turan, Hasan Hüseyin & Atmis, Mahir & Kosanoglu, Fuat & Elsawah, Sondoss & Ryan, Michael J., 2020. "A risk-averse simulation-based approach for a joint optimization of workforce capacity, spare part stocks and scheduling priorities in maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Carl R. Schultz, 1990. "On the optimality of the (S — 1,S) policy," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 715-723, October.
    15. Tiemessen, H.G.H. & van Houtum, G.J., 2013. "Reducing costs of repairable inventory supply systems via dynamic scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 478-488.
    16. Pedram Sahba & Barış Balcıog̃lu & Dragan Banjevic, 2018. "Multilevel rationing policy for spare parts when demand is state dependent," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 751-780, July.
    17. Meltem Denizel & Behlul Usdiken & Deniz Tuncalp, 2003. "Drift or Shift? Continuity, Change, and International Variation in Knowledge Production in OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 711-720, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:1:p:1-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.