IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v48y2024i2p594-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A field‐based study demonstrating the need of holistic management system for household biogas plants in rural India

Author

Listed:
  • Trinakshee Sarmah
  • Debendra Chandra Baruah

Abstract

Indian household biogas system appears promising to contribute substantially to its commitment to increase the share of renewable energy. There has been a consistent effort to promote the household biogas system by the Government of India. Despite such need and effort, the growth of household biogas system in India is not encouraging. Further, the need for appropriate management services for hassle‐free operation and maintenance of household biogas system is also analyzed based on field survey conducted in three villages. Cow dung is the primary feedstock and its abundant availability results in a higher level of adoption of household biogas plants in one of the villages. Alternative feedstocks can adequately supplement cow dung to support the household biogas system in the remaining two villages. Though the higher capital cost of the biogas system is a distracting factor, biogas as a cooking fuel is cheaper than both LPG and fuelwood while considering long‐term analysis. Thus, the continuation of subsidy on household biogas plant is justified considering the issue of affordability to bear capital cost even though for long‐term use non‐subsidized option is also profitable. The non‐availability of own feedstock is a critical issue which influences the economy of biogas users and hence the motivation. Analysis also revealed that the undesirable performance of household biogas system is mostly linked with the absence of proper diagnosis. Chronical poor performance is attributed to one or more factors related to feedstock, microbial activities, and climatic parameters which remain unknown to the users and lead to their diminishing interest. Technology‐integrated management support is expected to revive the interest in household biogas system in rural India.

Suggested Citation

  • Trinakshee Sarmah & Debendra Chandra Baruah, 2024. "A field‐based study demonstrating the need of holistic management system for household biogas plants in rural India," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 594-615, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:594-615
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12335
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-8947.12335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. P. Kharbanda & M. A. Qureshi, 1985. "Biogas Development in India and the PRC," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 51-65.
    2. Bhattacharya, S.C. & Jana, Chinmoy, 2009. "Renewable energy in India: Historical developments and prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 981-991.
    3. Gupta, Aashish & Vyas, Sangita & Hathi, Payal & Khalid, Nazar & Srivastav, Nikhil & Spears, Dean & Coffey, Diane, 2019. "Persistence of solid fuel use despite increases in LPG ownership: New survey evidence from rural north India," SocArXiv yv2es, Center for Open Science.
    4. Panigrahi, Sagarika & Dubey, Brajesh K., 2019. "A critical review on operating parameters and strategies to improve the biogas yield from anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 779-797.
    5. Das, Karabee & Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Baruah, D.C. & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2018. "Impact of time expenditure on household preferences for cooking fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 309-316.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:yv2es_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. V. P. Kharbanda & M. A. Qureshi, 1985. "Biogas Development in India and the PRC," The Energy Journal, , vol. 6(3), pages 51-66, July.
    8. Destek, Mehmet Akif & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu & Asamoah, Ernest Frimpong, 2020. "Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries," MPRA Paper 114218, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Mar 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minjing Yang & Cosimo Magazzino & Abraham Ayobamiji Awosusi & Navzodbek Abdulloev, 2024. "Determinants of Load capacity factor in BRICS countries: A panel data analysis," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 525-548, May.
    2. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Hynek Roubík & Jana Mazancová & Phung Le Dinh & Dung Dinh Van & Jan Banout, 2018. "Biogas Quality across Small-Scale Biogas Plants: A Case of Central Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. A. G. Olabi & Khaled Obaideen & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Maryam Nooman AlMallahi & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Ayman Mdallal & Asma Ali Murah Hassan & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Srikanth Reddy & Lokesh Panwar & Bijaya Ketan Panigrahi & Rajesh Kumar & Lalit Goel & Ameena Saad Al-Sumaiti, 2020. "A profit-based self-scheduling framework for generation company energy and ancillary service participation in multi-constrained environment with renewable energy penetration," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(4), pages 549-569, June.
    6. Tonanzi, B. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A. & Montecchio, D. & Pagliaccia, P. & Rossetti, S. & Braguglia, C.M., 2021. "Elucidating the key factors in semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of urban biowaste: The crucial role of sludge addition in process stability, microbial community enrichment and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 272-284.
    7. Punia Sindhu, Sonal & Nehra, Vijay & Luthra, Sunil, 2016. "Recognition and prioritization of challenges in growth of solar energy using analytical hierarchy process: Indian outlook," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 332-348.
    8. Apip Amrullah & Obie Farobie & Asep Bayu & Novi Syaftika & Edy Hartulistiyoso & Navid R. Moheimani & Surachai Karnjanakom & Yukihiko Matsumura, 2022. "Slow Pyrolysis of Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta) for Sustainable Production of Bio-Oil and Biochar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Ronita Bardhan & Ramit Debnath & Arnab Jana, 2019. "Evolution of sustainable energy policies in India since 1947: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
    10. Yaliwal, V.S. & Banapurmath, N.R. & Gireesh, N.M. & Tewari, P.G., 2014. "Production and utilization of renewable and sustainable gaseous fuel for power generation applications: A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 608-627.
    11. Ali, Shahid & Xiaohong, Zhou & Hassan, Syed Tauseef, 2024. "The hidden drivers of human development: Assessing its role in shaping BRICS-T's economics complexity, and bioenergy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    12. Singh, Rhythm, 2018. "Energy sufficiency aspirations of India and the role of renewable resources: Scenarios for future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2783-2795.
    13. Xuemeng Zhang & Chao Liu & Yuexi Chen & Guanghong Zheng & Yinguang Chen, 2022. "Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11471-11513, October.
    14. Madurai Elavarasan, Rajvikram & Pugazhendhi, Rishi & Irfan, Muhammad & Mihet-Popa, Lucian & Campana, Pietro Elia & Khan, Irfan Ahmad, 2022. "A novel Sustainable Development Goal 7 composite index as the paradigm for energy sustainability assessment: A case study from Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy & Brem, Gerrit & Wang, Shule & Wen, Yuming & Yang, Weihong & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Urbanowska, Agnieszka & Mościcki,, 2022. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization treatment for water and energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 577-591.
    16. Shimei Wu & Xiao Han & Chuan-Zhong Li & Andreas Löschel & Xi Lu & Limin Du & Xinye Zheng & Chu Wei, 2024. "Gigatonnes Missing Biomass Energy Consumption in Rural China," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(5), pages 149-166, September.
    17. Basinas, Panagiotis & Chamrádová, Kateřina & Rusín, Jiří & Kaldis, Sotiris P., 2024. "Anaerobic digestion performance and kinetics of biomass pretreated with various fungal strains utilizing exponential and sigmoidal equation models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Varun Pratap Singh & Gaurav Dwivedi, 2023. "Technical Analysis of a Large-Scale Solar Updraft Tower Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Jhanvi Gupta & Sanskar Jain & Suprava Chakraborty & Vladimir Panchenko & Alexandr Smirnov & Igor Yudaev, 2023. "Advancing Sustainable Energy Transition: Blockchain and Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in India’s Green Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Emmanuel Uche & Narasingha Das & Nnamdi Chinwendu Nwaeze & Pinki Bera, 2024. "Navigating the paths to sustainable environments via energy security, renewable energy and economic complexity: Evidence from array of pollution metrics," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(3), pages 1434-1455, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:594-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.