IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i6p3657-3665.html

How Does Kantian Optimization Matter in Union Bargaining Agenda?

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard F. S. Wang
  • Di Wu
  • Can Yang

Abstract

This paper examines union bargaining choices between RTM (right‐to‐manage) and EB (efficient bargaining) under Kantian optimization. We show that Kantian optimization constitutes a subgame perfect equilibrium, yielding higher firm profits and labor benefits than Nashian equilibrium, though potentially reducing consumer surplus. In Kantian optimization, the cooperation between the owners will hold the conventional belief that profits under RTM exceed those under EB, while the outputs under EB exceed those under RTM. But the workers' wages are reversed. The endogenous choice between the Kantian and Nash principles by firms and unions leads to higher wages and improves individual worker's welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard F. S. Wang & Di Wu & Can Yang, 2025. "How Does Kantian Optimization Matter in Union Bargaining Agenda?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(6), pages 3657-3665, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:3657-3665
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4548
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasuhiko Nakamura, 2023. "Notes on excess entry theorem in a Kantian oligopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 91(5), pages 506-519, September.
    2. John E. Roemer, 2021. "What Is Socialism Today? Conceptions Of A Cooperative Economy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(2), pages 571-598, May.
    3. Yasuhiko Nakamura, 2022. "Endogenous Determination of Strategies in a Kantian Duopoly," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 519-533, December.
    4. John E. Roemer, 2017. "Embedding Cooperation in General-equilibrium Models," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2098, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. Leonard F. S. Wang & Di Wu & Can Yang, 2025. "Trade Policy in a Third‐Country Model With Kantian Optimization," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 93(2), pages 191-198, March.
    6. Lopez, Monica Correa & Naylor, Robin A., 2004. "The Cournot-Bertrand profit differential: A reversal result in a differentiated duopoly with wage bargaining," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 681-696, June.
    7. Nickell, S J & Andrews, M, 1983. "Unions, Real Wages and Employment in Britain 1951-79," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(0), pages 183-206, Supplemen.
    8. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2019. "Bargaining Agenda in a Unionized Bilateral Monopoly," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 33(4), pages 450-462, December.
    9. Bergstrom, Theodore C, 1995. "On the Evolution of Altruistic Ethical Rules for Siblings," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 58-81, March.
    10. Emilio Carnevali & André Pedersen Ystehede, 2023. "Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 239-270, April.
    11. Di Wu & Ji Sun & Leonard F. S. Wang & Can Yang, 2024. "Cross ownership, union bargaining with managerial delegation, and stakeholders conflicts," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), pages 726-733, March.
    12. Brown, James N & Ashenfelter, Orley, 1986. "Testing the Efficiency of Employment Contracts," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(3), pages 40-87, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domenico Buccella & Luciano Fanti, 2025. "Bargaining Agendas as Strategic Tools," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 68(1), pages 99-118, March.
    2. Luciano Fanti, 2011. "When do firms prefer either monopolistic unions or an efficient bargaining?," Discussion Papers 2011/130, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    3. Fanti, Luciano & Buccella, Domenico, 2015. "Bargaining agenda, timing, and entry," MPRA Paper 64089, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Luciano Fanti, 2011. "When an efficient bargaining is more "efficient" than a competitive labour market," Discussion Papers 2011/131, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Yasuhiko Nakamura, 2023. "Merger incentives in an international oligopoly composed of Kantian optimization firms with differentiated goods," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3706-3723, September.
    6. Michael C. Burda & Bernd Fitzenberger & Alexander Lembcke & Thorsten Vogel, 2008. "Unionization, Stochastic Dominance, and Compression of the Wage Distribution: Evidence from Germany," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2008-041, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    7. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2018. "Union–Firm Bargaining Agenda Revisited: When Unions Have Distinct Preferences," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 35-50, January.
    8. Rupayan Pal & Bibhas Saha, 2016. "Entry Threats and Inefficiency in ‘Efficient Bargaining’," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 63(3), pages 258-277, July.
    9. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios & Tian, Mo, 2022. "Timing of environmental technological choice and trade unions' climate solidarity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Mukherjee, Soma & Broll, Udo & Mukherjee, Arijit, 2007. "Licensing by a monopolist and unionized labor market," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 09/07, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    11. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios & Tian, Mo, 2021. "Climate solidarity, green trade unions and timing of technological choice," MPRA Paper 106329, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Holm, Pasi & Honkapohja, Seppo & Koskela, Erkki, 1990. "A monopoly union model of wage determination with taxes and endogenous capital stock : an empirical application to the finnish manufacturing industry," Research Discussion Papers 24/1990, Bank of Finland.
    13. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2008-41 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ingela Alger & Jörgen W. Weibull, 2013. "Homo Moralis—Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2269-2302, November.
    15. Alger, Ingela & Weibull, Jörgen W., 2014. "Evolution leads to Kantian morality," TSE Working Papers 14-504, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jun 2015.
    16. Peter J. Luke & Mark E. Schaffer, 1999. "Wage Determination in Russia: An Econometric Investigation," CERT Discussion Papers 9908, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    17. Fanti, Luciano, 2013. "Cross-ownership and unions in a Cournot duopoly: When profits reduce with horizontal product differentiation," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-40.
    18. Shohei Yoshida, 2018. "Bargaining power and firm profits in asymmetric duopoly: an inverted-U relationship," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 139-158, June.
    19. Berbée, Paul & Brücker, Herbert & Garloff, Alfred & Sommerfeld, Katrin, 2022. "The labor demand effects of refugee immigration: Evidence from a natural experiment," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-069, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2021. "A contribution to the theory of R&D investments," GLO Discussion Paper Series 940, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    21. Sabien Dobbelaere & Jacques Mairesse, 2010. "Comparing Micro-evidence on Rent Sharing from Three Different Approaches," NBER Working Papers 16220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:3657-3665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.