IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i1p52-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clear the fog: Can public–private collaborative supervision promote the construction of a high‐quality public health system?

Author

Listed:
  • Neng Shen
  • Jing Zhang
  • Yang Chun Cao
  • Lin Zhang
  • Guoping Zhang

Abstract

Approaches to stimulating the initiative of collaborative cooperation of multiple subjects and the enthusiasm of public–private collaborative supervision are important to ensure the high‐quality development of the social public health system. This study constructs a four‐agent evolutionary game model with a medical enterprise, health administrative department, medical institution, and the social public as the core subjects. Using MATLAB 2018b to conduct simulation analysis, the cooperation strategy and operation mechanism of multiple subjects in the social public health system under public–private collaborative supervision are revealed, and the evolutionary stability strategy of multiple subjects under different situations is further explored. The results show (1) three evolutionary stability points in the system, which all exist in a state of loose government supervision. (2) Increasing the penalty limit can effectively regulate the behavior of medical enterprises and medical institutions; however, it is not conducive to the performance efficiency of the government in the long run. (3) Government incentives can stimulate the enthusiasm of all subjects to participate in the social public health system but should be controlled within a reasonable range. Excessive financial incentives make it easy for medical enterprises and institutions to form policy dependence.

Suggested Citation

  • Neng Shen & Jing Zhang & Yang Chun Cao & Lin Zhang & Guoping Zhang, 2025. "Clear the fog: Can public–private collaborative supervision promote the construction of a high‐quality public health system?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 52-66, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:52-66
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4349
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peters, D.T.J.M. & Raab, J. & Grêaux, K.M. & Stronks, K. & Harting, J., 2017. "Structural integration and performance of inter-sectoral public health-related policy networks: An analysis across policy phases," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1296-1302.
    2. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    3. Hammami, Ramzi & Salman, Sinan & Khouja, Moutaz & Nouira, Imen & Alaswad, Suzan, 2023. "Government strategies to secure the supply of medical products in pandemic times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1364-1387.
    4. Ramzi Hammami & Sinan Salman & Moutaz Khouja & Imen Nouira & Suzan Alaswad, 2023. "Government strategies to secure the supply of medical products in pandemic times," Post-Print hal-03997319, HAL.
    5. Anne S. Tsui & Peter McKiernan, 2022. "Understanding Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility in Business and Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1604-1627, September.
    6. Tuochen Li & Xinyu Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Government–Industry–University–Institute Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology Based on Game–Based Cellular Automata," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Park, Dojoon & Kang, Yong Joo & Eom, Young Ho, 2024. "Asset pricing tests for pandemic risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1314-1334.
    8. Shankar Prinja & Maninder Pal Singh & Kavitha Rajsekar & Oshima Sachin & Praveen Gedam & Anu Nagar & Balram Bhargava, 2021. "Correction to: Translating Research to Policy: Setting Provider Payment Rates for Strategic Purchasing under India’s National Publicly Financed Health Insurance Scheme," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 451-451, May.
    9. Weiwei Liu & Jianing Yang & Kexin Bi, 2020. "Factors Influencing Private Hospitals’ Participation in the Innovation of Biomedical Engineering Industry: A Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Shankar Prinja & Maninder Pal Singh & Kavitha Rajsekar & Oshima Sachin & Praveen Gedam & Anu Nagar & Balram Bhargava, 2021. "Translating Research to Policy: Setting Provider Payment Rates for Strategic Purchasing under India's National Publicly Financed Health Insurance Scheme," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 353-370, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maninder Pal Singh & Shankar Prinja & Kavitha Rajsekar & Praveen Gedam & Vipul Aggarwal & Oshima Sachin & Jyotsna Naik & Ajai Agarwal & Sanjay Kumar & Setu Sinha & Varsha Singh & Prakash Patel & Amit , 2022. "Cost of Surgical Care at Public Sector District Hospitals in India: Implications for Universal Health Coverage and Publicly Financed Health Insurance Schemes," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(5), pages 745-756, September.
    2. LeJeune, Leah & Ghaffarzadegan, Navid & Childs, Lauren M. & Saucedo, Omar, 2025. "Formulating human risk response in epidemic models: Exogenous vs endogenous approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 246-258.
    3. Shankar Prinja & Yashika Chugh & Kavitha Rajsekar & V. R. Muraleedharan, 2021. "National Methodological Guidelines to Conduct Budget Impact Analysis for Health Technology Assessment in India," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 811-823, November.
    4. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    5. Liu, Zhuo & Wang, Juan & Li, Xiaopeng, 2024. "Evolutionary dynamics of networked N-player trust games with exclusion strategy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Marco Tomassini & Alberto Antonioni, 2019. "Computational Behavioral Models for Public Goods Games on Social Networks," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Stojkoski, Viktor & Karbevski, Marko & Utkovski, Zoran & Basnarkov, Lasko & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in networked heterogeneous fluctuating environments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    8. Deng, Zhenghong & Wang, Shengnan & Gu, Zhiyang & Xu, Juwei & Song, Qun, 2017. "Heterogeneous preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 20-23.
    9. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Huang, Keke & Liu, Yishun & Zhang, Yichi & Yang, Chunhua & Wang, Zhen, 2018. "Understanding cooperative behavior of agents with heterogeneous perceptions in dynamic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 234-240.
    11. Qinghu Liao & Wenwen Dong & Boxin Zhao, 2023. "A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    13. Flores, Lucas S. & Han, The Anh, 2024. "Evolution of commitment in the spatial public goods game through institutional incentives," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    14. Arnaud Z. Dragicevic, 2025. "The Price Identity of Replicator(–Mutator) Dynamics on Graphs with Quantum Strategies in a Public Goods Game," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 74-102, March.
    15. Li, Yixiao & Jin, Xiaogang & Su, Xianchuang & Kong, Fansheng & Peng, Chengbin, 2010. "Cooperation and charity in spatial public goods game under different strategy update rules," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(5), pages 1090-1098.
    16. Manh Hong Duong & Hoang Minh Tran & The Anh Han, 2019. "On the Expected Number of Internal Equilibria in Random Evolutionary Games with Correlated Payoff Matrix," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 458-485, June.
    17. Haozheng Xu & Yiwen Zhang & Xing Jin & Jingrui Wang & Zhen Wang, 2023. "The Evolution of Cooperation in Multigames with Uniform Random Hypergraphs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, May.
    18. Genki Ichinose & Masaya Saito & Shinsuke Suzuki, 2013. "Collective Chasing Behavior between Cooperators and Defectors in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    19. Schauf, Andrew & Oh, Poong, 2021. "Myopic reallocation of extraction improves collective outcomes in networked common-pool resource games," SocArXiv w2cxp, Center for Open Science.
    20. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & Chen, Wei & He, Jialu, 2023. "Increased cooperation potential and risk under suppressed strategy differentiation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:52-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.