IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v45y2024i6p4039-4052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can monetary incentives improve knowledge contribution? Effects on different types of knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaopeng Luo
  • Shiqing Wang

Abstract

Enterprise social media (ESM) fosters knowledge sharing, but employee's participation in ESM typically wanes. Thus, monetary incentives are often used to solve this problem. This research examined the effect of monetary incentives on four types of knowledge (high‐quality and low‐quality, work‐related and non‐work‐related) and the mediating role of self‐efficacy. Using quasi‐experimental approach to analyze data from an internal company blog, the research indicates that monetary incentives do have impacts on stimulating knowledge contribution, although their effectiveness appears to vary with the type of knowledge. Besides, self‐efficacy could be evoked by monetary incentives and mediate between monetary incentives and knowledge contribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaopeng Luo & Shiqing Wang, 2024. "Can monetary incentives improve knowledge contribution? Effects on different types of knowledge," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 4039-4052, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:4039-4052
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4245
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Stephan Lukosch & Sander van Splunter & Frances M. T. Brazier & Mohsen Hamedi & Cees van Beers, 2017. "Employees’ participation in electronic networks of practice within a corporate group: perceived benefits and costs," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 460-470, August.
    2. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Marco Della Gala & Heli Aramo-Immonen & Jari J. Jussila & Hannu Kärkkäinen, 2019. "The use of social media for knowledge acquisition and dissemination in B2B companies: an empirical study of Finnish technology industries," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 52-69, January.
    3. Aurore Haas & David Abonneau & Stefano Borzillo & Louis-Pierre Guillaume, 2021. "Afraid of engagement? Towards an understanding of engagement in virtual communities of practice," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 169-180, April.
    4. Matthew Blackwell & Stefano Iacus & Gary King & Giuseppe Porro, 2009. "cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(4), pages 524-546, December.
    5. Yan Huang & Param Vir Singh & Anindya Ghose, 2015. "A Structural Model of Employee Behavioral Dynamics in Enterprise Social Media," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 2825-2844, December.
    6. Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Ravi Bapna & Vladas Griskevicius, 2018. "Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2065-2082, May.
    7. Warut Khern-am-nuai & Karthik Kannan & Hossein Ghasemkhani, 2018. "Extrinsic versus Intrinsic Rewards for Contributing Reviews in an Online Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 871-892, December.
    8. Yuewen Liu & Juan Feng, 2021. "Does Money Talk? The Impact of Monetary Incentives on User-Generated Content Contributions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 394-409, June.
    9. Jing Wang & Gen Li & Kai-Lung Hui, 2022. "Monetary Incentives and Knowledge Spillover: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3549-3572, May.
    10. Noam Koriat & Roy Gelbard, 2018. "Knowledge Sharing Motivation Among External and Internal IT Workers," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Cao, Xiongfei & Yu, Lingling, 2019. "Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 83-92.
    12. Peter Sarka & Christine Ipsen, 2017. "Knowledge sharing via social media in software development: a systematic literature review," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 594-609, November.
    13. Saman Attiq & Hassan Rasool & Shahid Iqbal, 2017. "The Impact of Supportive Work Environment, Trust, and Self-Efficacy on Organizational Learning and Its Effectiveness: A Stimulus-Organism Response Approach," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(2), pages 73-100, June.
    14. XiaoJuan Zhang & Xiang Jinpeng & Farhan Khan, 2020. "The Influence of Social Media on Employee’s Knowledge Sharing Motivation: A Two-Factor Theory Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueyu Liu & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2024. "UGC creator's video‐generation and program‐participation decisions in the presence of ad‐revenue‐sharing programs," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 4330-4349, September.
    2. Pengkun Wu & Eric W. T. Ngai & Yuanyuan Wu, 2023. "Impact of praise cashback strategy: Implications for consumers and e‐businesses," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(9), pages 2825-2845, September.
    3. Lena Abou El-Komboz & Anna Kerkhof & Johannes Loh, 2023. "Platform Partnership Programs and Content Supply: Evidence from the YouTube “Adpocalypse”," CESifo Working Paper Series 10363, CESifo.
    4. Dimitrios Tsekouras & Dominik Gutt & Irina Heimbach, 2024. "The robo bias in conversational reviews: How the solicitation medium anthropomorphism affects product rating valence and review helpfulness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 1651-1672, November.
    5. Marchenko, Maria & Sonnabend, Hendrik, 2022. "The Never Ending Book: The role of external stimuli and peer feedback in user-generated content production," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 320, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    6. Che-Wei Liu & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2019. "Unraveling the “Social” in Social Norms: The Conditioning Effect of User Connectivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1272-1295, April.
    7. Dandan Qiao & Shun-Yang Lee & Andrew B. Whinston & Qiang Wei, 2020. "Financial Incentives Dampen Altruism in Online Prosocial Contributions: A Study of Online Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1361-1375, December.
    8. Anna Ressi, 2020. "Discussion of “The Market for Reviews: Strategic Behavior of Online Product Reviewers with Monetary Incentives”," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(3), pages 437-445, July.
    9. Yuewen Liu & Juan Feng, 2021. "Does Money Talk? The Impact of Monetary Incentives on User-Generated Content Contributions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 394-409, June.
    10. Jason Chan & Zihong Huang & De Liu & Zhigang Cai, 2024. "Better to Give Than to Receive: Impact of Adding a Donation Scheme to Reward-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 272-293, March.
    11. Young Kwark & Gene Moo Lee & Paul A. Pavlou & Liangfei Qiu, 2021. "On the Spillover Effects of Online Product Reviews on Purchases: Evidence from Clickstream Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 895-913, September.
    12. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & D. Daniel Sokol & Xinyu Zang, 2024. "The rise of empirical online platform research in the new millennium," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 416-451, March.
    13. Rhett Brymer & John‐Patrick Paraskevas & Matthew Josefy & Lisa Ellram, 2024. "Pipeline hiring's effects on the human capital and performance of new recruits," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 1822-1850, September.
    14. Xueyu Liu & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2023. "Video‐sharing platform's optimal monetary incentive decisions considering motivation crowding‐out effect," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 371-387, January.
    15. Gordon Burtch & Qinglai He & Yili Hong & Dokyun Lee, 2022. "How Do Peer Awards Motivate Creative Content? Experimental Evidence from Reddit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3488-3506, May.
    16. Chen, Ruolan & Yuan, Ruizhi & Huang, Bo & Liu, Martin J., 2023. "Feeling warm or skeptical? An investigation into the effects of incentivized eWOM programs on customers’ eWOM sharing intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Hui Zhao & Xiaoyuan Wang & Debing Ni & Kevin W. Li, 2023. "The Quality-Signaling Role of Manipulated Consumer Reviews," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 503-536, June.
    18. Ina Garnefeld & Tabea Krah & Eva Böhm & Dwayne D. Gremler, 2021. "Online reviews generated through product testing: can more favorable reviews be enticed with free products?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 703-722, July.
    19. Dandan Qiao & Huaxia Rui, 2023. "Text Performance on the Vine Stage? The Effect of Incentive on Product Review Text Quality," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 676-697, June.
    20. Kaiwei Zhang & Xi Weng & Xienan Cheng, 2022. "Optimal Pricing Schemes in the Presence of Social Learning and Costly Reporting," Papers 2211.07362, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:4039-4052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.