IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v39y2018i5p515-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of process innovation introductions: Evidence from 115 developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Rajeev K. Goel
  • Michael A. Nelson

Abstract

This paper examines determinants of process innovation introductions across 115 (mostly) developing countries. Empirical research on process innovations lags behind product innovations. Accounting for firm characteristics, R&D, regulations and taxes, and corruption, results show that sole proprietors and R&D†performing firms were more likely to introduce innovations, whereas greater prosperity made them less likely to do so. Corruption had a greasing effect, whereas firms in island nations were less likely to introduce, ceteris paribus. Effects of regulations and taxes and other firm characteristics were largely insignificant. Finally, some differences existed across manufacturing and service industries and across prevalence of innovation introductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2018. "Determinants of process innovation introductions: Evidence from 115 developing countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 515-525, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:39:y:2018:i:5:p:515-525
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.2922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2922
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.2922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albert N. Link, 2021. "Investments in R&D and innovative behavior: an exploratory cross-country study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 731-739, June.
    2. Albert N. Link & Rashedur Rahman Sardar, 2023. "R&D and regional competitiveness: a study of global entrepreneurial firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 369-378, March.
    3. Genlong Guo & Shoude Li, 2023. "A dynamic analysis of a monopolist's efforts for improving product quality and process innovation with reference price effects under linear demand," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2328-2345, June.
    4. Dirk Dohse & Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2019. "Female owners versus female managers: Who is better at introducing innovations?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 520-539, April.
    5. Rajeev K. Goel & Ummad Mazhar & Rati Ram, 2022. "Informal competition and firm performance: Impacts on input‐ versus output performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 418-430, March.
    6. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2022. "Employment effects of R&D and process innovation: evidence from small and medium-sized firms in emerging markets," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 97-123, March.
    7. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2021. "How do firms use innovations to hedge against economic and political uncertainty? Evidence from a large sample of nations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 407-430, April.
    8. German Blanco & Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Do weak institutions undermine global innovation production efficiency?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1813-1838, October.
    9. Gaygysyz Ashyrov & Helery Tasane, 2024. "The roles of foreign and domestic ownership in the corruption–firm innovation nexus," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(1), pages 167-202, January.
    10. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2021. "Capacity utilization in emerging economy firms: Some new insights related to the role of infrastructure and institutions," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 97-106.
    11. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2020. "Do external quality certifications improve firms’ conduct? International evidence from manufacturing and service industries," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 97-104.
    12. Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah & Muhammad Anwar & Ch. Mazhar Hussain, 2021. "Top managers' attributes, innovation, and the participation in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor: A study of energy sector small and medium‐sized enterprises," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 385-406, March.
    13. Rajeev K. Goel & James W. Saunoris, 2020. "Design versus utility innovation: Is corruption sanding or greasing the wheels of innovation?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 848-860, July.
    14. Wu, Jiamei & Chen, Zhibin & Guo, Chong, 2022. "How does anti-corruption affect green innovation? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 405-424.
    15. Fengxiu Zhou & Chien-Chiang Lee, 2023. "Political uncertainty and innovation of export enterprises: international evidence for developing countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4371-4400, December.
    16. Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine & Kock, Ned & Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel & Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Jones, Paul, 2023. "Technology, innovation and SMEs' export intensity: Evidence from Morocco," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Thi Phuong Thao Nguyen & Phuc Hieu Nghiem & Thi Thu Hong Vo, 2022. "Building Capacity for Innovation - Evidence From Vietnam," Asian Economics Letters, Asia-Pacific Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(4), pages 1-6.
    18. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chih-Wei & Ho, Shan-Ju, 2020. "Country governance, corruption, and the likelihood of firms’ innovation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 326-338.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:39:y:2018:i:5:p:515-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.