IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v34y2013i1p40-43.html

On Price Competition with Market Share Delegation Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Kopel
  • Luca Lambertini

Abstract

We identify a mistake in the specification of the demand system used in the strategic delegation model based on market shares by Jansen et al. (2007), whereby the price remains above marginal cost when goods are homogeneous. After amending this aspect, we perform a profit comparison with the alternative delegation scheme la Fershtman and Judd (1987).
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Kopel & Luca Lambertini, 2013. "On Price Competition with Market Share Delegation Contracts," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 40-43, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:34:y:2013:i:1:p:40-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brianzoni, Serena & Gori, Luca & Michetti, Elisabetta, 2015. "Dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products and nonlinear costs: Analysis, comparisons and new evidences," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 191-203.
    2. Zhou, Jianheng & Zhao, Ruijuan & Wang, Weishen, 2019. "Pricing decision of a manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain with asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 809-820.
    3. Stadler, Manfred & Neus, Werner, 2018. "Cross Holdings and Strategic Manager Compensation. The Case of an Asymmetric Triopoly," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181534, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Gori, Luca & Sodini, Mauro & Fanti, Luciano, 2015. "A nonlinear Cournot duopoly with advertising," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 178-190.
    5. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca & Mammana, Cristiana & Michetti, Elisabetta, 2014. "Local and global dynamics in a duopoly with price competition and market share delegation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 253-270.
    6. A. Mahathi & Rupayan Pal & Vinay Ramani, 2016. "Competition, strategic delegation and delay in technology adoption," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 143-171, March.
    7. Werner Neus & Manfred Stadler, 2018. "Common holdings and strategic manager compensation: The case of an asymmetric triopoly," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(7), pages 814-820, October.
    8. Stadler Manfred & Unsorg Maximiliane, 2022. "Manager Delegation, Owner Coordination and Firms’ Investment in Automation," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 73(2), pages 159-182, August.
    9. Ghosh, Anomita & Pal, Rupayan & Song, Ruichao, 2024. "Network externalities, strategic delegation and optimal trade policy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    10. Leonard F. S. Wang, 2020. "Relative Performance Versus Market Share Delegation in a Vertically Related Market," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(1), pages 16-27, June.
    11. Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Lu, Qian & Wu, Xue & Zhao, Yueru, 2020. "Chaotic dynamics in Cournot duopoly model with bounded rationality based on relative profit delegation maximization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:34:y:2013:i:1:p:40-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.