IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v31y2026i2p2229-2248.html

Time‐Varying Efficiency and Predictability in Cryptocurrency Markets: Forward‐Looking Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Darko B. Vukovic
  • M. Kabir Hassan
  • Vyacheslav Zinovev
  • Elena Moiseevna Rogova
  • Mohammed Shakib

Abstract

This study investigates the time‐varying efficiency of major cryptocurrencies—Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC) and XRP—within the framework of the adaptive market hypothesis (AMH). We introduce a forward‐looking method by integrating predicted data into the Dominguez–Lobato (DL) and generalised spectral (GS) testing frameworks as part of Martingale Difference Theory (MDT). Our strategy allows us to forecast potential future inefficiencies in the market, advancing the traditional retrospective analyses (based on historical perspective) prevalent in the literature. We employ and test forecasted data to identify potential future shifts in market efficiency, as an extension of the Martingale difference hypothesis (MDH). The results indicate that cryptocurrency markets do not maintain a static level of efficiency but adapt over time, with varying degrees of predictability and inefficiency. The random forest (RF) model demonstrates the ability to forecast breaks in market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Darko B. Vukovic & M. Kabir Hassan & Vyacheslav Zinovev & Elena Moiseevna Rogova & Mohammed Shakib, 2026. "Time‐Varying Efficiency and Predictability in Cryptocurrency Markets: Forward‐Looking Dynamics," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 2229-2248, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:2229-2248
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.70039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70039
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.70039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balcilar, Mehmet & Bouri, Elie & Gupta, Rangan & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 74-81.
    2. Ambreen Khursheed & Muhammad Naeem & Sheraz Ahmed & Faisal Mustafa & David McMillan, 2020. "Adaptive market hypothesis: An empirical analysis of time –varying market efficiency of cryptocurrencies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1719574-171, January.
    3. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier & Kim, Jae H., 2012. "Exchange-rate return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from major foreign exchange rates," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1607-1626.
    4. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 59-82, Winter.
    5. Darko B. Vukovic & Lubov Spitsina & Ekaterina Gribanova & Vladislav Spitsin & Ivan Lyzin, 2023. "Predicting the Performance of Retail Market Firms: Regression and Machine Learning Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics," Working Papers 111, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    7. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics," Working Papers 111, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    8. repec:pri:cepsud:91malkiel is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Khaled Mokni & Ghassen El Montasser & Ahdi Noomen Ajmi & Elie Bouri, 2025. "On the Efficiency and Its Drivers in the Cryptocurrency Market: The Case of Bitcoin and Ethereum," Springer Books, in: Gang Kou & Yongqiang Li & Zongyi Zhang & J. Leon Zhao & Zhi Zhuo (ed.), Blockchain, Crypto Assets, and Financial Innovation, pages 162-191, Springer.
    10. Escanciano, J. Carlos & Velasco, Carlos, 2006. "Generalized spectral tests for the martingale difference hypothesis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 151-185, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Chanabasangouda Patil & Shailesh Rastogi, 2019. "Time-Varying Price–Volume Relationship and Adaptive Market Efficiency: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Asif, Raheel & Frömmel, Michael, 2022. "Testing Long memory in exchange rates and its implications for the adaptive market hypothesis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    3. Kristoufek, Ladislav & Vosvrda, Miloslav, 2016. "Gold, currencies and market efficiency," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 27-34.
    4. repec:idn:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:sp1:p:1-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Siddique, Maryam, 2023. "Does the Adaptive Market Hypothesis Exist in Equity Market? Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange," OSF Preprints 9b5dx, Center for Open Science.
    6. Darko B. Vuković & Sonja D. Radenković & Ivana Simeunović & Vyacheslav Zinovev & Milan Radovanović, 2024. "Predictive Patterns and Market Efficiency: A Deep Learning Approach to Financial Time Series Forecasting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Stéphane Goutte & David Guerreiro & Bilel Sanhaji & Sophie Saglio & Julien Chevallier, 2019. "International Financial Markets," Post-Print halshs-02183053, HAL.
    8. Kao, Yu-Sheng & Day, Min-Yuh & Chou, Ke-Hsin, 2024. "A comparison of bitcoin futures return and return volatility based on news sentiment contemporaneously or lead-lag," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Kim, Jae H. & Shamsuddin, Abul & Lim, Kian-Ping, 2011. "Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 868-879.
    10. Okoroafor, Ugochi Chibuzor & Leirvik, Thomas, 2022. "Time varying market efficiency in the Brent and WTI crude market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. Bernard Njindan Iyke, 2019. "A Test of the Efficiency of the Foreign Exchange Market in Indonesia," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 21(12th BMEB), pages 439-464, January.
    12. Dominik Stempie'n & Robert 'Slepaczuk, 2025. "Hybrid Models for Financial Forecasting: Combining Econometric, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Models," Papers 2505.19617, arXiv.org.
    13. David M. Ritzwoller & Joseph P. Romano, 2019. "Uncertainty in the Hot Hand Fallacy: Detecting Streaky Alternatives to Random Bernoulli Sequences," Papers 1908.01406, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    14. Pieter Nel & Renee van Eyden, 2026. "From News to Noise: Does Media Sentiment Drive Stock Market Volatility?," Working Papers 202605, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    15. Chia-Lin Chang & Jukka Ilomäki & Hannu Laurila & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Long Run Returns Predictability and Volatility with Moving Averages," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Bell, Peter N, 2013. "New Testing Procedures to Assess Market Efficiency with Trading Rules," MPRA Paper 46701, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Jitka Veselá & Alžběta Zíková, 2022. "Are the Czech, Polish, German and Dutch markets taking a random walk? [Konají český, polský, německý a nizozemský trh náhodnou procházku?]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(2), pages 19-38.
    18. Muchnik, Lev & Bunde, Armin & Havlin, Shlomo, 2009. "Long term memory in extreme returns of financial time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(19), pages 4145-4150.
    19. Ishani Chaudhuri & Parthajit Kayal, 2022. "Predicting Power of Ticker Search Volume in Indian Stock Market," Working Papers 2022-214, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    20. Ghada A. Altarawneh & Ahmad B. Hassanat & Ahmad S. Tarawneh & Ahmad Abadleh & Malek Alrashidi & Mansoor Alghamdi, 2022. "Stock Price Forecasting for Jordan Insurance Companies Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Utilizing Off-the-Shelf Technical Analysis Methods," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    21. John Sabelhaus, 2005. "Alternative Methods for Projecting Equity Returns: Implications for Evaluating Social Security Reform Proposals," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 8(1), pages 43-63, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:2229-2248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.