IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i3p493-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of the effect of cell immobilization on the hydrogenothrophic biomethanation of CO2

Author

Listed:
  • Tuğçe Dağlıoğlu
  • Tuba Ceren Öğüt
  • Guven Ozdemir
  • Nuri Azbar

Abstract

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been offered as a potential technological solution for mitigating the greenhouse gas emissions and climate change concern worldwide. Anaerobically carbon utilization has started to be in the agenda of researchers in recent years since this approach offers significant advantages such as use of catalysis reactions through environmentally friendly microorganisms under low temperature and pressure operational conditions. Moreover, a cleaner and more effective bioenergy production is realized in the form of biomethane. This study aimed to exploit the merits of cell immobilization in order to provide a stable hydrogenotrophic biomethanation process. For this purpose, two different immobilized bioreactors packed with plastic moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and glass beads packing materials were comparatively investigated. To the best of our knowledge, these two immobilization materials were used for the first time for this purpose. Two different bioreactor configurations were compared for the performance parameters such as methane formation rate, H2 consumption and methane contents in the headspace. Methane content in the headspace of these bioreactors were measured to be 80 and 75% for MBBR bioreactor and glass bead bioreactors, respectively. In addition, methane formation rates (MFR) of 5.14 and 4.8 m3/m3/day were achieved in MBBR and glass beads bioreactors, respectively. Even though both bioreactor configurations performed highly efficient biomethanation of CO2, the statistical evaluation of the results indicated that MBBR performance was more favourable for hydrogenotrophic biomethanation. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuğçe Dağlıoğlu & Tuba Ceren Öğüt & Guven Ozdemir & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "Comparative analysis of the effect of cell immobilization on the hydrogenothrophic biomethanation of CO2," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 493-505, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:493-505
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2062
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strübing, Dietmar & Moeller, Andreas B. & Mößnang, Bettina & Lebuhn, Michael & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Anaerobic thermophilic trickle bed reactor as a promising technology for flexible and demand-oriented H2/CO2 biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 543-554.
    2. Bensmann, A. & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. & Heyer, R. & Kohrs, F. & Benndorf, D. & Reichl, U. & Sundmacher, K., 2014. "Biological methanation of hydrogen within biogas plants: A model-based feasibility study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 413-425.
    3. Rachbauer, Lydia & Voitl, Gregor & Bochmann, Günther & Fuchs, Werner, 2016. "Biological biogas upgrading capacity of a hydrogenotrophic community in a trickle-bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 483-490.
    4. Seifert, A.H. & Rittmann, S. & Herwig, C., 2014. "Analysis of process related factors to increase volumetric productivity and quality of biomethane with Methanothermobacter marburgensis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 155-162.
    5. Andreas Lemmer & Timo Ullrich, 2018. "Effect of Different Operating Temperatures on the Biological Hydrogen Methanation in Trickle Bed Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Burkhardt, Marko & Busch, Günter, 2013. "Methanation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 74-79.
    7. Christiana Figueres & Corinne Le Quéré & Anand Mahindra & Oliver Bäte & Gail Whiteman & Glen Peters & Dabo Guan, 2018. "Emissions are still rising: ramp up the cuts," Nature, Nature, vol. 564(7734), pages 27-30, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Thema & Tobias Weidlich & Manuel Hörl & Annett Bellack & Friedemann Mörs & Florian Hackl & Matthias Kohlmayer & Jasmin Gleich & Carsten Stabenau & Thomas Trabold & Michael Neubert & Felix Ortlo, 2019. "Biological CO 2 -Methanation: An Approach to Standardization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-32, May.
    2. Voelklein, M.A. & Rusmanis, Davis & Murphy, J.D., 2019. "Biological methanation: Strategies for in-situ and ex-situ upgrading in anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1061-1071.
    3. Jensen, M.B. & Ottosen, L.D.M. & Kofoed, M.V.W., 2021. "H2 gas-liquid mass transfer: A key element in biological Power-to-Gas methanation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Burkhardt, Marko & Jordan, Isabel & Heinrich, Sabrina & Behrens, Johannes & Ziesche, André & Busch, Günter, 2019. "Long term and demand-oriented biocatalytic synthesis of highly concentrated methane in a trickle bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 818-826.
    5. Andreas Lemmer & Timo Ullrich, 2018. "Effect of Different Operating Temperatures on the Biological Hydrogen Methanation in Trickle Bed Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Strübing, Dietmar & Moeller, Andreas B. & Mößnang, Bettina & Lebuhn, Michael & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Anaerobic thermophilic trickle bed reactor as a promising technology for flexible and demand-oriented H2/CO2 biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 543-554.
    7. Inkeri, Eero & Tynjälä, Tero & Laari, Arto & Hyppänen, Timo, 2018. "Dynamic one-dimensional model for biological methanation in a stirred tank reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 95-107.
    8. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    9. Götz, Manuel & Lefebvre, Jonathan & Mörs, Friedemann & McDaniel Koch, Amy & Graf, Frank & Bajohr, Siegfried & Reimert, Rainer & Kolb, Thomas, 2016. "Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1371-1390.
    10. Rittmann, Simon K.-M.R. & Seifert, Arne H. & Bernacchi, Sébastien, 2018. "Kinetics, multivariate statistical modelling, and physiology of CO2-based biological methane production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 751-760.
    11. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Skiadas, Ioannis V. & Gavala, Hariklia N., 2020. "Modeling of syngas biomethanation and catabolic route control in mesophilic and thermophilic mixed microbial consortia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    13. Díaz, Israel & Fdz-Polanco, Fernando & Mutsvene, Boldwin & Fdz-Polanco, María, 2020. "Effect of operating pressure on direct biomethane production from carbon dioxide and exogenous hydrogen in the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Park, Jun-Gyu & Kwon, Hye-Jeong & Cheon, A-In & Jun, Hang-Bae, 2021. "Jet-nozzle based improvement of dissolved H2 concentration for efficient in-situ biogas upgrading in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 270-279.
    15. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Dobson, Alan D.W. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2021. "Improved robustness of ex-situ biological methanation for electro-fuel production through the addition of graphene," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Okkyoung Choi & MinJeong Kim & Youngwook Go & Moon-Gi Hong & Bomin Kim & Yonghyun Shin & Sangho Lee & Young Gook Kim & Ji Sun Joo & Byoung Seung Jeon & Byoung-In Sang, 2019. "Selective Removal of Water Generated during Hydrogenotrophic Methanation from Culture Medium Using Membrane Distillation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Savvas, Savvas & Donnelly, Joanne & Patterson, Tim & Chong, Zyh S. & Esteves, Sandra R., 2017. "Biological methanation of CO2 in a novel biofilm plug-flow reactor: A high rate and low parasitic energy process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 238-247.
    18. Néméhie Lawson & Merlin Alvarado-Morales & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Irini Angelidaki, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Ruggero Bellini & Ilaria Bassani & Arianna Vizzarro & Annalisa Abdel Azim & Nicolò Santi Vasile & Candido Fabrizio Pirri & Francesca Verga & Barbara Menin, 2022. "Biological Aspects, Advancements and Techno-Economical Evaluation of Biological Methanation for the Recycling and Valorization of CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, June.
    20. Giuseppe Lembo & Silvia Rosa & Antonella Marone & Antonella Signorini, 2023. "In Situ Biogas Upgrading in a Randomly Packed Gas-Stirred Tank Reactor (GSTR)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:493-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.