IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v8y2026i1ne70038.html

From Scenario Thinking to Scenario Doing: Strategic Management as Wayfinding

Author

Listed:
  • Harry Sminia

Abstract

This paper blends the ingredients of practice‐oriented theorizing, scenarios, and dynamic capability to propose wayfinding as an alternative to strategic management as planning. It will augment the notion of “scenario thinking” by placing it within the “scenario doing” of participating in developmental trajectories by which a firm evolves into the future. Wayfinding is presented as being done by way of practical coping, conscious reflecting, or practical solutioning. A firm engaging in practical coping utilizes practical intelligibility—an understanding or “knowhow” and “know why“ of how to enact practices—to generate a ‘business‐as‐usual’ trajectory that is reflected in a baseline scenario: a cognitive and discursive representation of how this trajectory moves the firm into the future. A firm experiences a breakdown IN practical coping when a lack of practical intelligibility makes a firm unable to participate in the ‘business‐as‐usual’ trajectory. Scenario thinking then has to take on the form of conscious reflecting to identify which additional practical intelligibility the firm needs to draw in to restore a firm's practical coping. Practical solutioning deals with a breakdown OF practical coping when practical intelligibility is non‐existent and is to be newly created. Scenario thinking thus becomes speculative imagination to develop new practical intelligibility. Dynamic capability then is elaborated as a firm's ability to participate in ongoing developmental trajectories by way of practical coping, conscious reflecting, and practical solutioning. The argumentation is illustrated with the case of how MP3 became part of the recorded music field.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry Sminia, 2026. "From Scenario Thinking to Scenario Doing: Strategic Management as Wayfinding," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:8:y:2026:i:1:n:e70038
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Bowman & R. Bradley MacKay, 2020. "Scenario planning as strategic activity: A practice‐orientated approach," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3-4), September.
    2. Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia, 2002. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
    3. Damon Golsorkhi & Linda Rouleau & David Seidl & Eero Vaara, 2015. "Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02298228, HAL.
    4. Martha S. Feldman, 2000. "Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 611-629, December.
    5. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    6. Mark P. Healey & Gerard P. Hodgkinson, 2024. "Overcoming strategic persistence: Effects of multiple scenario analysis on strategic reorientation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1423-1445, August.
    7. Damon Golsorkhi & Linda Rouleau & David Seidl & Eero Vaara, 2015. "Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice," Post-Print hal-02298228, HAL.
    8. MacKay, Brad & Tambeau, Paul, 2013. "A structuration approach to scenario praxis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 673-686.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sérgio Cavalcante, 2014. "Preparing for business model change: the “pre-stage” finding," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(2), pages 449-469, May.
    2. Haridimos Tsoukas & Gerardo Patriotta & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Sally Maitlis, 2020. "On the way to Ithaka[1]: Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of Karl E. Weick’s The Social Psychology of Organizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1315-1330, November.
    3. Georg Schreyögg & Jörg Sydow, 2010. "CROSSROADS---Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1251-1262, December.
    4. Bjerregaard, Toke & Jeppesen, Frederik, 2023. "Framing strategy under high complexity: Processes and practices of ongoing reframing in the becoming of strategy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 458-470.
    5. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1119-1154, September.
    6. Gary T. Burke & Carola Wolf, 2021. "The Process Affordances of Strategy Toolmaking when Addressing Wicked Problems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 359-388, March.
    7. Lucas Gabriel De Paula Silveira & Eugênia Vale De Paula, 2026. "Dynamic capabilities erosion: a systematic review, integrative framework, and research agenda," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, December.
    8. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    9. Dean A. Shepherd & Jeffery S. Mcmullen & William Ocasio, 2017. "Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 626-644, March.
    10. Feim M. Blakçori, 2014. "The Role of Formal Routines in Organizational Innovation," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(2), pages 56-70, February.
    11. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    12. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    13. Brian T. Pentland & Thorvald Hærem & Derek Hillison, 2011. "The (N)Ever-Changing World: Stability and Change in Organizational Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1369-1383, December.
    14. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    15. van Rijnsoever & Marius Meeus & Roger Donders, 2012. "The effects of economic status and recent experience on innovative behavior under environmental variability: an experimental approach," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 12-01, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Jan 2012.
    16. Metz, Ashley & Hartley, Paul, 2020. "Scenario development as valuation: Opportunities for reflexivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Meeus, Marius T.H. & Donders, A. Rogier T., 2012. "The effects of economic status and recent experience on innovative behavior under environmental variability: An experimental approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 833-847.
    18. Ambisisi Ambituuni & Oluyomi A. Osobajo & Xebiso Blessing Kamudyariwa & Douglas A. Adu, 2025. "Project‐Based Enactment of Circular Economy (CE) Business Models: A Systematic Literature Review of the CE–Project Research Nexus," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10942-10961, December.
    19. Sung‐Choon Kang & Scott A. Snell, 2009. "Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 65-92, January.
    20. Alexandra Michel, 2014. "The Mutual Constitution of Persons and Organizations: An Ontological Perspective on Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1082-1110, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:8:y:2026:i:1:n:e70038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.