IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v2y2020i3-4ne45.html

History can reject teleology; not so, scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Donaldson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Donaldson, 2020. "History can reject teleology; not so, scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3-4), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:2:y:2020:i:3-4:n:e45
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.45
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.45?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    2. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aineas Mallios & Taylan Mavruk, 2025. "Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1540-1563, April.
    2. Caroline Flammer, 2026. "Sustainable Finance: Tools, Effectiveness, and Challenges," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 21(1), pages 14-19, January.
    3. Song, Fenghua & Thakor, Anjan & Quinn, Robert, 2023. "Purpose, profit and social pressure," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    4. Keusch, Thomas & Timmermans, Oscar, 2026. "Can financial metrics provide incentives for environmental performance improvement?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 139003, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. David J. Denis, 2024. "Is corporate finance research in decline?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 257-264, May.
    6. Aaberge, Rolf & Francesconi, Marco & Modalsli, Jorgen & Vestad, Ola, 2024. "How Business Income Measures Affect Income Inequality and the Tax Burden," CEPR Discussion Papers 19725, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    7. Geng, Heng & Hau, Harald & Michaely, Roni & Nguyen, Binh Hoang, 2025. "Common institutional investors and board representation in rival firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Cnossen, Femke & Nikolova, Milena, 2025. "Work meaningfulness and effort," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. S. Taniguchi, Kazuhiro, 2022. "Why Fukushima? A diachronic and multilevel comparative institutional analysis of a nuclear disaster," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Mitchell Hoffman & Christopher T. Stanton, 2024. "People, Practices, and Productivity: A Review of New Advances in Personnel Economics," NBER Working Papers 32849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Sachdeva, Kunal & Silva, André F. & Slutzky, Pablo & Xu, Billy Y., 2025. "Defunding controversial industries: Can targeted credit rationing choke firms?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Liu, Manlu & Tang, Jing & Walton, Stephanie & Zhang, Yiyang & Zhao, Xinlei, 2024. "Auditor sustainability focus and client sustainability reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Bonnefon, Jean-François & Landier, Augustin & Sastry, Parinitha & Thesmar, David, 2025. "The moral preferences of investors: Experimental evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Zwetelina Iliewa & Elisabeth Kempf & Oliver Spalt, 2025. "Corporate Actions as Moral Issues," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_649v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Apr 2025.
    16. Daniel Broby & Zhenjia Yang, 2025. "What Is Green Fintech?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Cécile Ezvan & Patricia Langohr, 2024. "Conditions for mission‐led companies to humanize the economy: An Aristotelian perspective," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Dangl, Thomas & Halling, Michael & Yu, Jin & Zechner, Josef, 2025. "Social preferences and corporate investment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    19. Khan, Sarfraz & Wald, John K., 2025. "Which governance mechanisms matter for firm pollution?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    20. Elisa Navarra, 2022. "Stock Market Response to Firms’ Misconduct," Working Papers ECARES 2022-40, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:2:y:2020:i:3-4:n:e45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.