IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v2y2020i3-4ne45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

History can reject teleology; not so, scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Donaldson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Donaldson, 2020. "History can reject teleology; not so, scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3-4), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:2:y:2020:i:3-4:n:e45
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.45
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.45?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    2. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Fenghua & Thakor, Anjan & Quinn, Robert, 2023. "Purpose, profit and social pressure," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Michele Fioretti, 2022. "Caring or Pretending to Care? Social Impact, Firms' Objectives, and Welfare (former title: Social Responsibility and Firm's Objectives)," SciencePo Working papers hal-03393065, HAL.
    3. David J. Denis, 2024. "Is corporate finance research in decline?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 257-264, May.
    4. Michele Fioretti & Victor Saint-Jean & Simon C Smith, 2022. "The Voice: The Shareholders' Motives Behind Corporate Donations during COVID-19 (former title: Selfish Shareholders: Corporate Donations during COVID-19)," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03386585, HAL.
    5. S. Taniguchi, Kazuhiro, 2022. "Why Fukushima? A diachronic and multilevel comparative institutional analysis of a nuclear disaster," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Elisa Navarra, 2022. "Stock Market Response to Firms’ Misconduct," Working Papers ECARES 2022-40, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Alonso Alfaro-Urena & Benjamin Faber & Cecile Gaubert & Isabela Manelici & Jose P. Vasquez, 2022. "Responsible Sourcing? Theory and Evidence from Costa Rica," CESifo Working Paper Series 10108, CESifo.
    8. Accetturo, Antonio & Barboni, Giorgia & Cascarano, Michele & Garcia-Appendini, Emilia & Tomasi, Marco, 2022. "Credit supply and green Investments," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 615, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    9. repec:bdi:wptemi:td_1456_24 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Miguel Alzola, 2023. "Conceptions of the Firm and Corporate Allegiances," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 201-216, August.
    11. Mircea Epure, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility as a signaling technology," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 907-930, April.
    12. Matteo Alpino & Luca Citino & Guido de Blasio & Federica Zeni, 2022. "The Effects of Climate Change on the Italian economy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 728, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    13. Yanbing Wang & Michael S. Delgado & Jin Xu, 2023. "When and where does it pay to be green? – A look into socially responsible investing and the cost of equity capital," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Yang, Ruoke, 2022. "What do we learn from ratings about corporate social responsibility? New evidence of uninformative ratings," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Birgit Meyer & Andreas Reinstaller, 2022. "Doing Well by Doing Good. Verantwortungsvolles Unternehmertum als Wettbewerbsvorteil österreichischer Unternehmen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 69619, June.
    16. Mansouri, Sasan & Momtaz, Paul P., 2022. "Financing sustainable entrepreneurship: ESG measurement, valuation, and performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(6).
    17. Kahn, Matthew E. & Matsusaka, John G. & Shu, Chong, 2023. "Divestment and Engagement: The Effect of Green Investors on Corporate Carbon Emissions," IZA Discussion Papers 16518, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Thomas Brzustowski & Francesco Caselli, 2021. "Economic Growth in a Cooperative Economy," Discussion Papers 2101, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    19. Wang, Yujie & Tsang, Albert & Xiang, Yi & Yan, Shuo, 2024. "How can regulators affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from regulatory disclosures of consumer complaints in the U.S," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    20. Eleonora Broccardo & Oliver D. Hart & Luigi Zingales, 2020. "Exit vs. Voice," Working Papers 2020-114, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    21. Huang, Chenchen & Luo, Di & Mukherjee, Soumyatanu & Mishra, Tapas, 2022. "To Acquire or to Ally? Managing Partners’ Environmental Risk in International Expansion," MPRA Paper 117591, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jan 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:2:y:2020:i:3-4:n:e45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.