IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v26y2019i1p127-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Amor‐Esteban
  • Ma‐Purificación Galindo‐Villardón
  • Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez
  • Fátima David

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to extend the Industrial Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Index proposed for the 10 main industries in the 39 sectors of activity that comprise them. This extension will provide more detailed information on CSR practices at the industrial level, especially about sustainable development and environmental concerns. In addition, this paper stablishes an aggregate measure of industrial classification and mimetic typologies. It will tabulate the overall impact that the economic activity of a company has on society and environment. Thereby, the relationships between these indicators and the mimetic institutional forces are studied, testing these forces indicate that companies from sectors considered to have greater impact/risk have higher corporate social responsibility (CSR) scores than companies from other sectors. Additionally, using the MetaBiplot statistical multivariate technique, which by the comparison and integration of several subspaces provides a global view of sustainability at a sectoral level, it was found that the most polluting companies with the highest environmental risks—forestry and paper, mining, oil and gas producers, gas, water, and multi‐utilities, tobacco and electricity sectors—show their predilection for environmental policies and reports, human rights, and stakeholder participation. Moreover, the less polluting companies—banks, insurance, media, telecommunications, real state, and general retailers—are more intensive on staff and implement policies aimed at favoring: the personal and work‐life balance with systems for employee training and promotion; the equal opportunities and participation; the maintenance of good customer and supplier relations; and the fight to counteract bribery.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Amor‐Esteban & Ma‐Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Fátima David, 2019. "An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 127-140, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:1:p:127-140
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.1665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1665
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.1665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiago Melo & Alvaro Garrido‐Morgado, 2012. "Corporate Reputation: A Combination of Social Responsibility and Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 11-31, January.
    2. Demirbag, Mehmet & Wood, Geoffrey & Makhmadshoev, Dilshod & Rymkevich, Olga, 2017. "Varieties of CSR: Institutions and Socially Responsible Behaviour," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1064-1074.
    3. Boudt, Kris & Cornelissen, Jonathan & Croux, Christophe, 2013. "The impact of a sustainability constraint on the mean-tracking error efficient frontier," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 255-260.
    4. Hongquan Chen & Saixing Zeng & Han Lin & Hanyang Ma, 2017. "Munificence, Dynamism, and Complexity: How Industry Context Drives Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 125-141, February.
    5. Suzanne Young & Magalie Marais, 2012. "A Multi-level Perspective of CSR Reporting: The Implications of National Institutions and Industry Risk Characteristics," Post-Print hal-02523055, HAL.
    6. Sepideh Parsa & Leo Xiaobing Deng, 2008. "Capital markets' reactions to social information announcements," International Journal of Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 107-120.
    7. Laura Maria Ferri & Nelly Oelze & André Habisch & Mario Molteni, 2016. "Implementation of responsible Procurement Management: An Institutional Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 261-276, May.
    8. Atle Blomgren, 2011. "Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? a case study of executive perceptions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 263-274, September.
    9. Umit Alniacik & Esra Alniacik & Nurullah Genc, 2011. "How corporate social responsibility information influences stakeholders' intentions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 234-245, July.
    10. Suzanne Young & Vijaya Thyil, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Role of Context in International Settings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Constantin Belu, 2009. "Ranking corporations based on sustainable and socially responsible practices. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 257-268.
    12. Bert Scholtens, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility in the international insurance industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 143-156, March/Apr.
    13. González-Rodríguez, M. Rosario & Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen & Simonetti, Biagio, 2015. "The social, economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: The role played by consumers and potential entrepreneurs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 836-848.
    14. Pasi Heikkurinen, 2010. "Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 142-152, May.
    15. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Emma García‐Meca, 2017. "CSR Engagement and Earnings Quality in Banks. The Moderating Role of Institutional Factors," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 145-158, March.
    16. Milad Abdelnabi Salem & Fekri Shawtari & Mohd Farid Shamsudin & Hafezali Bin Iqbal Hussain, 2018. "The Consequences of Integrating Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Development (Environmental Perspectives)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 255-268, May.
    17. Natalia Semenova & Lars G. Hassel, 2008. "Financial outcomes of environmental risk and opportunity for US companies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 195-212.
    18. Gregory Jackson & Androniki Apostolakou, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 371-394, July.
    19. Heledd Jenkins, 2004. "Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 23-34, March.
    20. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2008. "Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 685-701, December.
    21. Gallego-Álvarez, Prof. Isabel & Ortas, Prof. Eduardo, 2017. "Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 337-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mitzi Isabel Cubilla‐Montilla & Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ana Belén Nieto‐Librero & María Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1181-1197, May.
    2. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Filippo Vitolla, 2023. "Board committees and non-financial information assurance services," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Pier Luigi Marchini & Tatiana Mazza & Alice Medioli, 2020. "Corruption and sustainable development: The impact on income shifting in European international groups," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 717-730, March.
    4. Anna Chwiłkowska-Kubala & Szymon Cyfert & Kamila Malewska & Katarzyna Mierzejewska & Witold Szumowski, 2021. "The Relationships among Social, Environmental, Economic CSR Practices and Digitalization in Polish Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Maurizio Massaro & Carlo Bagnoli & Francesca Dal Mas, 2020. "The role of human sustainability in professional service firms. Evidence from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2668-2678, September.
    6. Svobodova, Kamila & Vojar, Jiri & Yellishetty, Mohan & Janeckova Molnarova, Kristina, 2020. "A multi-component approach to conceptualizing the reputation of the mining industry from a stakeholder perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Ciro Troise & Serena Strazzullo & Stefano Bresciani, 2023. "Creating shared value through open innovation approaches: Opportunities and challenges for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4485-4502, November.
    8. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Cristina Aibar‐Guzmán & Miriam Núñez‐Torrado & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "Are institutional investors “in love” with the sustainable development goals? Understanding the idyll in the case of governments and pension funds," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1099-1116, October.
    9. Linda Jansen & Peggy Cunningham & Sandra Diehl & Ralf Terlutter, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility in controversial industries: A literature review and research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4398-4427, September.
    10. Fabricio Stocker & Michelle P. de Arruda & Keysa M. C. de Mascena & João M. G. Boaventura, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2071-2080, September.
    11. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Víctor Amor‐Esteban & Cristina Aibar‐Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2023. "Translating the 2030 Agenda into reality through stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 941-958, April.
    12. Lenka Veselovská & Ján Závadský & Zuzana Závadská, 2020. "Mitigating bribery risks to strengthen the corporate social responsibility in accordance with the ISO 37001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1972-1988, July.
    13. Giovanni Zampone & Giuseppe Sannino & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2023. "Exploring the moderating effects of corporate social responsibility performance under mimetic pressures. An international analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 53-65, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Víctor Amor-Esteban & Mª-Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2019. "A Multivariate Proposal for a National Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Index (NCSRPI) for International Settings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 525-560, June.
    2. Víctor Amor‐Esteban & María Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Bias in composite indexes of CSR practice: An analysis of CUR matrix decomposition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1914-1936, July.
    3. Víctor Amor-Esteban & Mª-Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Fátima David, 2018. "Study of the Importance of National Identity in the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: A Multivariate Vision," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-33, August.
    4. Mitzi Isabel Cubilla‐Montilla & Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ana Belén Nieto‐Librero & María Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1181-1197, May.
    5. Selin Türkel & Ebru Uzunoğlu & Melike Demirbağ Kaplan & Beril Akıncı Vural, 2016. "A Strategic Approach to CSR Communication: Examining the Impact of Brand Familiarity on Consumer Responses," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 228-242, July.
    6. Roselyne Cheruiyot-Koech & Colin David Reddy, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Preferences in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Francisco J. García‐Rodríguez & José León García‐Rodríguez & Carlos Castilla‐Gutiérrez & Silvério A. Major, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Oil Companies in Developing Countries: From Altruism to Business Strategy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 371-384, November.
    8. Emmanuel Lawal & Gökan May & Bojan Stahl, 2017. "The Significance of Corporate Social Disclosure for High‐Tech Manufacturing Companies: Focus on Employee and Community Aspects of Sustainable Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 295-311, July.
    9. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    10. Yuanyuan Zhang & Zhe Ouyang, 2021. "Doing well by doing good: How corporate environmental responsibility influences corporate financial performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 54-63, January.
    11. Wioleta Kucharska & Rafał Kowalczyk, 2019. "How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 453-467, March.
    12. Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez, 2020. "How cultural dimensions, legal systems, and industry affect environmental reporting? Empirical evidence from an international perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2037-2057, July.
    13. Esben Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz, 2014. "From Resistance to Opportunity-Seeking: Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Nordic Fashion Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 245-264, January.
    14. Dongmin Kong & Shasha Liu & Yunhao Dai, 2014. "Environmental Policy, Company Environment Protection, and Stock Market Performance: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 100-112, March.
    15. Gutama Kusse Getele & Tieke Li & Tsitaire Jean Arrive, 2020. "Corporate culture in small and medium enterprises: Application of corporate social responsibility theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 897-908, March.
    16. H. L. Zou & R. C. Zeng & S. X. Zeng & Jonathan J. Shi, 2015. "How Do Environmental Violation Events Harm Corporate Reputation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 836-854, December.
    17. Eduardo Ortas & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & Igor Álvarez, 2019. "National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms' environmental, social, and governance performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 598-611, May.
    18. Yusen Dong & Senhua Chen & Yixue Wu, 2023. "Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of investee peers corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1841-1855, July.
    19. Johan Graafland & Niels Noorderhaven, 2020. "Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long-term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(6), pages 1034-1043, August.
    20. Shin, Jiyoung & Moon, Jon Jungbien & Kang, Jingoo, 2023. "Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:1:p:127-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.