IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v1y1985i1p25-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic feasibility of narrow row spindle picker cotton

Author

Listed:
  • Paul W. Teague

    (Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University)

  • Marvin D. Heilman

    (Soil Scientist, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Weslaco, Texas)

  • Ronald D. Lacewell

    (Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University)

Abstract

Agronomic research has shown that cotton grown on narrower rows (30 in) can exhibit a positive yield response when compared to conventionally spaced rows (40 in). While narrow row cotton can easily be harvested with a stripper harvester, spindle pickers are not currently available with that capability. Recently, several independent producers devised a conversion procedure to allow a standard spindle picker to harvest 30-in row cotton. This economic feasibility study of such a conversion indicates that narrow row cotton can produce a higher and more stable net return than conventionally spaced cotton when harvested with a converted spindle picker. This applies to the Lower Rio Grande Valley and can be extended to other areas which produce long staple cotton that requires spindle picking.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul W. Teague & Marvin D. Heilman & Ronald D. Lacewell, 1985. "Economic feasibility of narrow row spindle picker cotton," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 25-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:1:y:1985:i:1:p:25-31
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(198521)1:1<25::AID-AGR2720010104>3.0.CO;2-T
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyle P. Fettig, 1963. "Adjusting Farm Tractor Prices for Quality Changes, 1950–1962," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 599-611.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oczkowski, Edward A., 1994. "A Hedonic Price Function For Australian Premium Table Wine," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Peterson, Willis L. & Hayami, Yujiro, 1977. "Technical Change in Agriculture," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Technical Change and Productivity Growth in the U.K. Agricultural Sector," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232790, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    4. Unknown, 1980. "Measurement of U.S. Agricultural Productivity: A Review of Current Statistics and Proposals for Change," Technical Bulletins 157718, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Yujiro Hayami, 1969. "Resource Endowments and Technological Change in Agriculture: U.S. and Japanese Experiences in International Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(5), pages 1293-1303.
    6. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Houssou, Nazaire & Diao, Xinshen, 2018. "Effects of tractor ownership on returns-to-scale in agriculture: Evidence from maize in Ghana," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 33-49.
    7. Pagoulatos, Angelos & Debertin, David L. & Johnson, William L., 1982. "An Econometric Analysis Of Qualitative Choice Among Performance Characteristics Of Agricultureal Tractors," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2015. "Market imperfections for tractor service provision in Nigeria: International perspectives and empirical evidence:," IFPRI discussion papers 1424, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Thirtle, Colin G., 1985. "Technological Change And The Productivity Slowdown In Field Crops: United States, 1939-78," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Abebe, Kassahun & Dahl, Dale C. & Olson, Kent D., 1989. "The Demand For Farm Machinery," Staff Papers 14194, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Peterson, Willis & Hayami, Yujiro, 1977. "PART VII. Technical Change in Agriculture," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337219.
    12. Parket, Douglas & Zilberman, David, 1989. "Price Transmission Across Marketing Levels in a Hedonic Framework," CUDARE Working Papers 198498, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Wang, Sun Ling & Schimmelpfennig, David & Ball, Eldon, 2013. "Embodied-Technical Change of Farm Tractors in U.S. Agricultural Productivity Analysis: What Does Hedonic Price Tell Us?," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 151211, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Conley, Dennis M. & Lambert, Douglas A., 1981. "Demand for Farm Tractor Horsepower in the U.S," Illinois Agricultural Economics Staff Paper 243909, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    15. Ethridge, Don & Morse, Steve & Engels, Carlos, 1991. "Hedonic Price Analysis Of Cotton In Daily Market Reporting," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271082, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:1:y:1985:i:1:p:25-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.