IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/wirtsc/v104y2024i6p387-394n1010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stromgestehungskosten von Erneuerbaren sind kein guter Indikator für zukünftige Stromkosten

Author

Listed:
  • Grimm Veronika
  • Oechsle Leon
  • Zöttl Gregor

Abstract

The falling levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) of renewables is often used to argue that electricity costs in Germany will decline. However, the LCOE is not a reliable basis for estimating future electricity costs because gaps between demand and supply of insufficient renewable production will have to be covered by complementary technologies such as battery storage or gas-fired power plants and, in the future, hydrogen-fueled power plants. The investment costs of these plants and their operation must be included in the calculation of the costs of meeting demand. The “Levelised Cost of Load Coverage” (LCOLC) calculated in this way does not indicate that electricity costs will fall significantly in the coming decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Grimm Veronika & Oechsle Leon & Zöttl Gregor, 2024. "Stromgestehungskosten von Erneuerbaren sind kein guter Indikator für zukünftige Stromkosten," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 104(6), pages 387-394.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:wirtsc:v:104:y:2024:i:6:p:387-394:n:1010
    DOI: 10.2478/wd-2024-0104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2024-0104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/wd-2024-0104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Grimm, Veronika & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2018. "Investment incentives for flexible demand options under different market designs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 372-389.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Grimm, Veronika & Rückel, Bastian & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2021. "The impact of market design on transmission and generation investment in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Bohlayer, Markus & Fleschutz, Markus & Braun, Marco & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Energy-intense production-inventory planning with participation in sequential energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Runge, Philipp & Sölch, Christian & Albert, Jakob & Wasserscheid, Peter & Zöttl, Gregor & Grimm, Veronika, 2019. "Economic comparison of different electric fuels for energy scenarios in 2035," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1078-1093.
    5. Maximilian Borning & Larissa Doré & Michael Wolff & Julian Walter & Tristan Becker & Grit Walther & Albert Moser, 2020. "Opportunities and Challenges of Flexible Electricity-Based Fuel Production for the European Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Jun Dong & Dongran Liu & Xihao Dou & Bo Li & Shiyao Lv & Yuzheng Jiang & Tongtao Ma, 2021. "Key Issues and Technical Applications in the Study of Power Markets as the System Adapts to the New Power System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Pereira, Diogo Santos & Marques, António Cardoso, 2020. "How should price-responsive electricity tariffs evolve? An analysis of the German net demand case," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Jeddi, Samir & Sitzmann, Amelie, 2021. "Network tariffs under different pricing schemes in a dynamically consistent framework," EWI Working Papers 2021-1, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    9. Grimm, Veronika & Grübel, Julia & Rückel, Bastian & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Storage investment and network expansion in distribution networks: The impact of regulatory frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    10. Grimm, Veronika & Rückel, Bastian & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2019. "Regionally differentiated network fees to affect incentives for generation investment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 487-502.
    11. Eicke, Anselm, 2022. "Where should generators be built in a zonal electricity market? A numerical analysis of administratively determined investment signals," EconStor Preprints 261346, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Rövekamp, Patrick & Schöpf, Michael & Wagon, Felix & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2023. "For better or for worse? On the economic and ecologic value of industrial demand side management in constrained electricity grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 278.
    14. Jörn C. Richstein & Seyed Saeed Hosseinioun, 2020. "Industrial Demand Response: How Network Tariffs and Regulation Do (Not) Impact Flexibility Provision in Electricity Markets and Reserves," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1853, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q31 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:wirtsc:v:104:y:2024:i:6:p:387-394:n:1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.