IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v17y2023i1p2002-2013n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Companies Can Gain a Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the New Digital Era? The Case of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Plesea Doru Alexandru

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Petre Adrian

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Olaru Stelian Mircea

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze how digitalization can impact the level of competitiveness of those organizations that implement a digitalization strategy and to define the current situation in Romania in terms of the level of competitiveness at the international level and the main associated influencing factors. The research covers, first of all, the critical analysis of the current scientific literature on this topic. In the second part of the paper, we used econometric analysis, statistical data interpretation as well as descriptive analysis. The main results show, on the one hand, a positive and strong correlation between digitalization and competitiveness, and on the other hand the fact that Romania is far behind, in terms of international competitiveness, for reasons not exclusively related to digitalization. The article is a contribution to the specialized literature because it confirms some of the results obtained by other researchers regarding the relationship between innovation and business performance and at the same time proposes concrete measures to improve the level of competitiveness according to the main current issues that we have identified. Our study also presents possible practical implications, both for the academic environment, and for the policymakers and managers involved in the development of the Romanian business sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Plesea Doru Alexandru & Petre Adrian & Olaru Stelian Mircea, 2023. "How Companies Can Gain a Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the New Digital Era? The Case of Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 2002-2013, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:2002-2013:n:10
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2023-0176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0176
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2023-0176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niël Almero Krüger & Natanya Meyer, 2021. "The Development of a Small and Medium-Sized Business Risk Management Intervention Tool," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Edilson Bacinello & Gérson Tontini & Anete Alberton, 2020. "Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 749-759, March.
    3. Grazia Dicuonzo & Francesca Donofrio & Simona Ranaldo & Vittorio Dell'Atti, 2022. "The effect of innovation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 1191-1209, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Xie & Shaokang Wu & Ghulam Subhani & Sakina, 2025. "Analyzing how digital orientation contributes to organizational innovation and environmental, social and governance performance through digital inclusion and capabilities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Costantiello, Alberto & Drago, Carlo & Arnone, Massimo & Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Regional Research Intensity and ESG Indicators in Italy: Insights from Panel Data Models and Machine Learning," MPRA Paper 124185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Yu, Di & Zhu, Yongyi, 2025. "Executives with digital backgrounds and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Amit Kumar Singh & Yifang Zhang & Anu, 2023. "Understanding the Evolution of Environment, Social and Governance Research: Novel Implications From Bibliometric and Network Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(2), pages 350-386, April.
    5. Leogrande, Angelo & Leogrande, Domenico & Costantiello, Alberto, 2023. "The Impact of Patent Applications in the Context of the ESG Model at World Level," EconStor Preprints 273495, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Vincent O’Connell & Naser M. AbuGhazaleh & Oliver Browne & Mike Farrell & Michelle Gleeson & Eimear McGeown, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainability: The Impact of Research and Development Expenditure on Future Environmental Innovation in European Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Xu, Jian & Yin, Jian, 2025. "Digital transformation and ESG performance: The chain mediating role of technological innovation and financing constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Erasmia Angelaki & Alexandros Garefalakis & Markos Kourgiantakis & Ioannis Sitzimis & Ioannis Passas, 2025. "ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Wei, Rongrong & Yu, Zhaopeng & Zhen, Deyun, 2025. "The differentiated effect of China's new environmental protection law on corporate ESG performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 2126-2141.
    10. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.
    12. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Lourdes Pérez & Guadalupe Valera‐Blanes, 2020. "CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2765-2776, November.
    13. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Yihua Wu & Muhammad Farrukh & Ali Raza & Fanchen Meng & Imtiaz Alam, 2021. "Framing the evolution of the corporate social responsibility and environmental management journal," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1397-1411, July.
    15. Luis E. Villegas & Andrés A. Acuña-Duarte & César A. Salazar, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Willingness to Eco-Innovate among Chilean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Chai Bin‐Feng & Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Tanveer Ahsan & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi, 2024. "How uncertainty can determine corporate ESG performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2290-2310, May.
    17. Dongdong Li & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2022. "Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1439-1447, July.
    18. Zeeshan Ullah & Ahmad Arslan & Vesa Puhakka, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility strategy, sustainable product attributes, and export performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1840-1853, November.
    19. Likitapiwat, Tanakorn & Starita, Stefano & Treepongkaruna, Sirimon & Chan, Kam Fong, 2024. "Corporate innovation culture and ESG: Evidence from textual analysis in emerging market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    20. García-Piqueres, Gema & García-Ramos, Rebeca, 2022. "Complementarity between CSR dimensions and innovation: behaviour, objective or both?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 475-489.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:2002-2013:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.