IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v16y2022i1p179-187n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study regarding the volatility of main cryptocurrencies

Author

Listed:
  • Micu Raluca
  • Dumitrescu Dalina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

Abstract

Developments in digital technologies are considered to be the most important innovations since the advent of the internet. In several countries, this has led to a significant change in the way payments are made, leading to new forms of payment, such as crypto-currencies. With regard to cryptocurrencies, it remains a complex issue involving especially volatility, but also money laundering and consumer protection issues. While most countries consider cryptocurrencies too volatile to be used as a payment alternative, crypto-currencies gain interest of investors in the last 10 years due to the possibility of obtaining large profits. The aim of the paper is to study the volatility of the first 5 cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin, Cardano and Ripple) through GARCH models. The process of evaluating highly volatile cryptocurrencies is complex and depends on many parameters. Therefore, our results would be particularly useful in terms of portfolio and risk management and could help them to be more agile in evaluating their investments, in making optimal decisions and making future forecasts. We find that the GARCH (1.1) models provide the best fit, in terms of modelling of the volatility in the most popular and largest cryptocurrencies. The results show that for BTC, ETH and XRP the appropriate model is GARCH (1.1) and in the case of BNC and CARDANO GARCH-M explain better the volatility of the crypto-currencies. Therefore, more in depth analysis of the datasets may be required to confirm or deny possible structural change. The study can be complemented by carrying out an event study on the 5 cryptocurrencies analyzed or extending the analysis by applying other GARCH models, to research the optimal model for several cryptocurrencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Micu Raluca & Dumitrescu Dalina, 2022. "Study regarding the volatility of main cryptocurrencies," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 179-187, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:179-187:n:11
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2022-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Yermack, 2013. "Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An economic appraisal," NBER Working Papers 19747, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Pınar Kaya Soylu & Mustafa Okur & Özgür Çatıkkaş & Z. Ayca Altintig, 2020. "Long Memory in the Volatility of Selected Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Katsiampa, Paraskevi, 2017. "Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 3-6.
    4. Viviane Naimy & Omar Haddad & Gema Fernández-Avilés & Rim El Khoury, 2021. "The predictive capacity of GARCH-type models in measuring the volatility of crypto and world currencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Jeffrey Chu & Stephen Chan & Saralees Nadarajah & Joerg Osterrieder, 2017. "GARCH Modelling of Cryptocurrencies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyócsa, Štefan & Molnár, Peter & Plíhal, Tomáš & Širaňová, Mária, 2020. "Impact of macroeconomic news, regulation and hacking exchange markets on the volatility of bitcoin," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Panagiotidis, Theodore & Papapanagiotou, Georgios & Stengos, Thanasis, 2022. "On the volatility of cryptocurrencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Walid Chkili, 2021. "Modeling Bitcoin price volatility: long memory vs Markov switching," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 433-448, September.
    4. Yhlas Sovbetov, 2018. "Factors Influencing Cryptocurrency Prices: Evidence from Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dash, Litcoin, and Monero," Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, Tripal Publishing House, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27.
    5. Christie Smith & Aaron Kumar, 2018. "Crypto‐Currencies – An Introduction To Not‐So‐Funny Moneys," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1531-1559, December.
    6. Köchling, Gerrit & Schmidtke, Philipp & Posch, Peter N., 2020. "Volatility forecasting accuracy for Bitcoin," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Jiménez, Inés & Mora-Valencia, Andrés & Perote, Javier, 2022. "Semi-nonparametric risk assessment with cryptocurrencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Sercan Demiralay & Selçuk Bayracı, 2021. "Should stock investors include cryptocurrencies in their portfolios after all? Evidence from a conditional diversification benefits measure," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6188-6204, October.
    9. Leandro Maciel, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies value‐at‐risk and expected shortfall: Do regime‐switching volatility models improve forecasting?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4840-4855, July.
    10. Klein, Tony & Pham Thu, Hien & Walther, Thomas, 2018. "Bitcoin is not the New Gold – A comparison of volatility, correlation, and portfolio performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 105-116.
    11. Nikolaos A. Kyriazis, 2021. "A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-46, June.
    12. Apopo, Natalay & Phiri, Andrew, 2019. "On the (in)efficiency of cryptocurrencies: Have they taken daily or weekly random walks?," MPRA Paper 94712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Samuel Asante Gyamerah, 2019. "Estimating the volatility of Bitcoin using GARCH models," Papers 1909.04903, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    14. C. Y. Tan & Y. B. Koh & K. H. Ng & K. H. Ng, 2019. "Structural Change Analysis of Active Cryptocurrency Market," Papers 1909.10679, arXiv.org.
    15. Ziaul Haque Munim & Mohammad Hassan Shakil & Ilan Alon, 2019. "Next-Day Bitcoin Price Forecast," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Zhou, Siwen, 2018. "Exploring the Driving Forces of the Bitcoin Exchange Rate Dynamics: An EGARCH Approach," MPRA Paper 89445, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lepomäki, Laura & Kanniainen, Juho & Hansen, Henri, 2021. "Retaliation in Bitcoin networks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Gregor Dorfleitner & Carina Lung, 2018. "Cryptocurrencies from the perspective of euro investors: a re-examination of diversification benefits and a new day-of-the-week effect," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(7), pages 472-494, December.
    19. Rama K. Malladi & Prakash L. Dheeriya, 2021. "Time series analysis of Cryptocurrency returns and volatilities," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 45(1), pages 75-94, January.
    20. Saha, Kunal, 2018. "An investigation into the dependence structure of major cryptocurrencies," EconStor Preprints 181878, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:179-187:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.