IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joinma/v17y2025i2p72-87n1003.html

The Recruitment and Selection Process as a Key Component of Human Resource Acquisition Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Podleśna Kinga Ewa

    (Faculty of Management and Security Sciences, SAN University, Poland)

  • Dzierż Sandra Julia

    (Faculty of Management and Security Sciences, SAN University, Poland)

Abstract

Objectives The main objective of the study is to comprehensively assess the level of satisfaction of candidates participating in recruitment processes at Company X and to identify key factors determining their satisfaction. Methodology The study used a diagnostic survey method with a survey technique. The research tool was a proprietary survey questionnaire containing both closed -ended questions and a sociodemographic metric. The study was conducted in March 2025 on a group of 53 people who participated in recruitment for various positions at Company X. Candidates received invitations to participate in the study by email. Findings Key factors influencing candidate satisfaction include the attractiveness of the terms and conditions of employment, the length and transparency of the recruitment process, the respect shown by recruiters and receiving constructive feedback after the recruitment process. An efficient and transparent process reduces candidates’ stress levels, reinforcing their positive feelings toward the organization, which is conducive to building loyalty and promoting the company as an employer. Value Added This study underscores the key role of the recruitment process, which is an important part of business strategies, with increasing importance being given to candidate satisfaction levels. A positive recruitment experience significantly influences both the decision of candidates to accept an offer of employment and the perception of the company as an attractive employer. Recommendations Respondents rated their satisfaction with the recruitment process mostly positively, but areas for further improvement were nevertheless identified. Satisfaction with recruitment is determined not only by the specifics of a particular job offer, but also by the overall perception of the organization, including its organizational culture and corporate values. The results of the study indicate that candidate satisfaction is influenced by the quality of recruitment materials, the preferred form of recruitment and the way feedback is provided, as well as other factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Podleśna Kinga Ewa & Dzierż Sandra Julia, 2025. "The Recruitment and Selection Process as a Key Component of Human Resource Acquisition Strategy," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 72-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:72-87:n:1003
    DOI: 10.2478/joim-2025-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2025-0007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/joim-2025-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas & Winsborough, Dave & Sherman, Ryne A. & Hogan, Robert, 2016. "New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 621-640, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    2. Pavel Sorokin & Vera Maltseva, 2024. "From Discrete Skills to Holistic Creative Human Potential: An Emerging Approach in Theory and Practice," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 18(1), pages 6-17.
    3. Neelam Kaushal & Rahul Pratap Singh Kaurav & Brijesh Sivathanu & Neeraj Kaushik, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and HRM: identifying future research Agenda using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 455-493, June.
    4. Ümit Deniz İlhan & Burcu Kümbül Güler & Dilara Turgut & Cem Duran, 2025. "Opportunities and challenges of asynchronous video interviews: Perceptions of human resources professionals from Türkiye," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner & Sascha Alexander Ruhle, 2025. "This (AI)n’t fair? Employee reactions to artificial intelligence (AI) in career development systems," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1195-1228, April.
    6. Anna Lena Hunkenschroer & Christoph Luetge, 2022. "Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 977-1007, July.
    7. Alexander Simons & Isabell Wohlgenannt & Markus Weinmann & Stefan Fleischer, 2021. "Good gamers, good managers? A proof-of-concept study with Sid Meier’s Civilization," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 957-990, May.
    8. Alina Köchling & Shirin Riazy & Marius Claus Wehner & Katharina Simbeck, 2021. "Highly Accurate, But Still Discriminatory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(1), pages 39-54, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions
    • M53 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Training

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:72-87:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.