IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cejopp/v17y2023i1p1-13n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Health Measures Enacted by the Norwegian Political Leadership to Protect the Elderly in Response to the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Tokovska Miroslava

    (1 Kristiania University College, School of Health Sciences, Departement of Health and Exercise, Prinsens gate 7-9, 0152, Oslo, Norway)

  • Sørensen Anette

    (2 Kristiania University College, School of Health Sciences, Departement of Health and Exercise, Prinsens gate 7-9, 0152, Oslo, Norway)

  • Nour Magde Mohamed

    (3 Kristiania University College, School of Health Sciences, Departement of Health and Exercise, Prinsens gate 7-9, 0152 Oslo, Norway)

  • Ferreira Vanessa Nolasco

    (4 Kristiania University College, School of Health Sciences, Departement of Psychology, Pedagogy and Law, Kalfarveien 78C, 5022, Bergen, Norway)

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic crisis is ongoing, and the elderly are still affected by the virus, sometimes with fatal consequences. The political leaders are, inter alia, focussed on protecting citizens, including this vulnerable group. This article aims to describe the response of the Norwegian political leadership, with a focus on the public health measures enacted to protect the elderly during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic crisis in the years 2020 and 2021. This study has a descriptive qualitative research design using thematic-content analysis as a methodology to evaluate data collected from official documents, national statistics and public health documents from Norway. Statistics show that the elderly mortality rate per 100,000 person-weeks during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was 2.69 in Norway; during the second wave of the pandemic, it was 1.43. The public health measures the Norwegian political leadership instigated were more effective in containing the crisis when compared to other European countries, and this paper investigates the reasons. The results of our study provide public health policy decision-makers with insights into analytical material showing the usefulness of different measures enacted by the Norwegian government. The Norwegian government’s responses to the crisis, such as the public health measures, restrictions, social consequences for vulnerable groups such as the elderly, as well as cross-government and cross-community cooperation, will need further in-depth analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Tokovska Miroslava & Sørensen Anette & Nour Magde Mohamed & Ferreira Vanessa Nolasco, 2023. "Public Health Measures Enacted by the Norwegian Political Leadership to Protect the Elderly in Response to the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Crisis," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1-13:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2023-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tor-Ivar Karlsen & Charlotte Kiland & Gro Kvåle & Dag Olaf Torjesen, 2022. "‘Health in All Policies’ and the Urge for Coordination: The Work of Public Health Coordinators and Their Impact and Influence in Local Public Health Policies: A Cross-Sectional Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Andrey N. Petrov & Larry D. Hinzman & Lars Kullerud & Tatiana S. Degai & Liisa Holmberg & Allen Pope & Alona Yefimenko, 2020. "Building resilient Arctic science amid the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-4, December.
    3. Arjen Boin & Sanneke Kuipers & Werner Overdijk, 2013. "Leadership in Times of Crisis: A Framework for Assessment," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 79-91, April.
    4. Martinussen, Pål E., 2022. "Let's stick together: The role of self-interest and ideological beliefs for supporting a ‘solidaristic’ health policy in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 262-268.
    5. Jostein Askim & Tomas Bergström, 2022. "Between lockdown and calm down. Comparing the COVID-19 responses of Norway and Sweden," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 291-311, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Czura & Florian Englmaier & Hoa Ho & Lisa Spantig, 2023. "Employee Performance and Mental Well-Being: The Mitigating Effects of Transformational Leadership during Crisis," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 412, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    2. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek & Tomasz Owczarek, 2020. "Complementarity of Communication and Coordination in Ensuring Effectiveness of Emergency Management Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Charlotte Förster & Caroline Paparella & Stephanie Duchek & Wolfgang H. Güttel, 2022. "Leading in the Paradoxical World of Crises: How Leaders Navigate Through Crises," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 631-657, December.
    4. Cristine de Clercy & Peter Ferguson, 2016. "Leadership in Precarious Contexts: Studying Political Leaders after the Global Financial Crisis," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 104-114.
    5. Elena Bogdanova & Konstantin Filant & Medeya Ivanova & Tatiana Romanenko & Ludmila Voronina & Kamrul Hossain & Praskovia Filant & Sergei Andronov & Andrey Lobanov, 2022. "Strengthening Collaboration of the Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Arctic: Adaptation in the COVID-19 Pandemic Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Brown, Bernard & Wang, Ting & Lee, Moosung & Childs, Alison, 2023. "Surviving, navigating and innovating through a pandemic: A review of research on school leadership during COVID-19, 2020–2021," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Alison D. Perrin & Gita Ljubicic & Aynslie Ogden, 2021. "Northern Research Policy Contributions to Canadian Arctic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-39, October.
    8. Bonvecchi, Alejandro & Calvo, Ernesto & Otálvaro-Ramírez, Susana & Scartascini, Carlos, 2022. "The Effect of a Crisis on Trust and Willingness to Reform: Evidence from Survey Panels in Argentina and Uruguay," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12359, Inter-American Development Bank.
    9. Jian Gao & Yian Yin & Kyle R. Myers & Karim R. Lakhani & Dashun Wang, 2021. "Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, December.
    10. Arandas, Mohammed Fadel, 2019. "Malaysian Media Coverage of Palestinian Presidents’ Image during Crises 1996-2016," SocArXiv kbcr4, Center for Open Science.
    11. Melissa A. Wheeler & Timothy Bednall & Vlad Demsar & Samuel G. Wilson, 2022. "Falling Apart and Coming Together: How Public Perceptions of Leadership Change in Response to Natural Disasters vs. Health Crises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Mojtaba Salem & Niels Van Quaquebeke & Maria Besiou, 2022. "Aid worker adaptability in humanitarian operations: Interplay of prosocial motivation and authoritarian leadership," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 3982-4001, November.
    13. Leilei Tang & Bonai Fan & Chengjiang Li & Gang Zhao, 2022. "Empirical Evaluation of the Environmental Emergency Management Capability of Local Governments in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Kira Matus & Naubahar Sharif & Alvin Li & Zhixin Cai & Wai Haang Lee & Max Song, 2023. "From SARS to COVID-19: the role of experience and experts in Hong Kong’s initial policy response to an emerging pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1-13:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.