IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v16y2025i1p48-60.html

A user-based approach to urban passenger transport service quality measurement

Author

Listed:
  • E.D. Starshov

    (Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • A.E. Ivanov

    (Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • A.A. Golubeva

    (Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Centre for Econometrics and Business Analytics, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Within the previous decade, many cities in Russia have introduced major changes in urban passenger transportation (UPT) systems with the aim to increase service quality and make public transport more attractive. The paper develops and tests a new user-oriented approach to UPT service quality measurement. The study is based on user-oriented approaches on service quality borrowed from the marketing field. The proposed approach combines qualitative and quantitative research methods. The data for analysis were collected in May 2024 through three focus groups (21 participants) and an online survey (398 respondents). Contrary to the bulk of literature on this issue, the current study focuses on subjective preferences of the users, where 24 service quality attributes are elicited through the focus groups while their importance and individual levels of satisfaction are measured through the survey. The use of subjective characteristics allows developing a UPT service quality index that can be utilised for longitudinal analysis and comparative studies. Testing of the proposed approach for the transport system of Saint Petersburg (Russia) showed that prioritised development areas for the UPT service quality increase are waiting time and conditions, traffic safety, predictability, transfer conditions, and ride smoothness. The study contributes to the understanding and measurement of UPT service quality and provides a tool for effective decision-making in urban transport system development.

Suggested Citation

  • E.D. Starshov & A.E. Ivanov & A.A. Golubeva, 2025. "A user-based approach to urban passenger transport service quality measurement," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 48-60, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:48-60
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-1-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/113/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2025/1725
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-1-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caruana, Albert & Ewing, Michael T. & Ramaseshan, B., 2000. "Assessment of the Three-Column Format SERVQUAL: An Experimental Approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 57-65, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gür, Oya Altinsoy, 2019. "Targeted and perceived service quality," MPRA Paper 98034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Saraei, Soudabe & Amini, Amir M., 2012. "A study of service quality in rural ICT renters of Iran by SERVQUAL," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 571-578.
    3. Akter, Shahriar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & D’Ambra, John, 2019. "Enabling a transformative service system by modeling quality dynamics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 210-226.
    4. Ya Lan WANG & Tainyi LUOR & Pin LUARN & Hsi-peng LU, 2015. "Contribution and Trend to Quality Research—a literature review of SERVQUAL model from 1998 to 2013," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(1), pages 34-45.
    5. Ekta Duggal & Harsh V. Verma, 2016. "Deconstructing Retail Service Quality in India," Paradigm, , vol. 20(2), pages 143-158, December.
    6. Glunk, U. & Heijltjes, M.G., 2003. "Changes in the top management team: performance implications of altering team composition," Research Memorandum 050, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    7. Anne Julien & Christina Tsoni, 2013. "Front-line Employee versus Customer Perceptions of Quality Attributes," Post-Print halshs-00850129, HAL.
    8. Ali, Mazhar & Ahmed, Masood, 2018. "Determinants of students’ loyalty to university: A service-based approach," MPRA Paper 84352, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Shahzaf Iqbal & Tahir Ashfaq & Che Azlan Bin Taib & Mohd Rizal Razalli, 2023. "The effect of quality culture on service quality of public and private Universities: A comparative analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, April.
    10. D. Vandaele & P. Gemmel, 2004. "Development of a measurement scale for business-to-business service quality: assessment in the facility services sector," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/259, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    11. Halil Nadiri, 2011. "Customers’ zone of tolerance for retail stores," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(2), pages 113-137, June.
    12. Oya Altinsoy Gür, 2020. "Targeted and perceived service quality," Post-Print hal-02458432, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:48-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.