IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tkp/jouijm/v8y2019i2p195-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction-Related Data Management: Classification and Description of Data from Different Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Janne Harkonen

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

  • Erno Mustonen

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

  • Harri Haapasalo

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

Abstract

The productivity improvement of the construction sector has fallen behind other industries. One potential factor is the on-site nature of the work that may not allow for as industrial way of operations as off-site construction. Also, the division into non-optimised chain of domains of architecture, engineering, construction and facilities management may play a role. The construction objects may not be considered as products that would necessitate careful consideration of the product structure, both commercially and technically to optimise the use of platforms, assemblies, components, and materials while offering what customers desire. Furthermore, the life-cycle of building objects and the varying needs during design, construction and the use-phase are not acknowledged effectively. Addressing the life-cycle of building objects necessitates taking command of the relevant data and understanding the bigger picture. Currently the data are managed in an un-organised manner. This study aims to form the pre-requisites for managing construction object-related data. The study is realised as a combination of a literature review and analysing constructors’ offerings, requirements plans, Ministry reports, and building control documentations. A rather detailed example of construction object related data management is presented to discuss master data, and business process related data in the context of business processes and enterprise applications, and different Billsof-Materials (BOM) configurations to demonstrate the necessary considerations. The example also acknowledges the product structure, necessary parameters, and stakeholders. New contribution is provided by presenting valuable insights with a broader scope for setting up effective data management in the construction sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Janne Harkonen & Erno Mustonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2019. "Construction-Related Data Management: Classification and Description of Data from Different Perspectives," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 8(2), pages 195-220.
  • Handle: RePEc:tkp:jouijm:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:195-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.issbs.si/press/ISSN/2232-5697/8_195-220.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seppo Kuula & Harri Haapasalo & Arto Tolonen, 2018. "Cost-efficient co-creation of knowledge intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 779-808, December.
    2. Janne Harkonen & Arto Tolonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2018. "Modelling of Construction Products and Services for Effective Productisation," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(4), pages 335-353.
    3. Tolonen, Arto & Shahmarichatghieh, Marzieh & Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri, 2015. "Product portfolio management – Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 468-477.
    4. Jordan Verrollot & Arto Tolonen & Janne Harkonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2017. "Strategic alignment of product portfolio and supplier management," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 337-364.
    5. Antti Saaksvuori & Anselmi Immonen, 2008. "Product Lifecycle Management," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-78172-1, April.
    6. Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri & Hanninen, Kai, 2015. "Productisation: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 65-82.
    7. Risto Silvola & Arto Tolonen & Janne Harkonen & Harri Haapasalo & Tarja Mannisto, 2019. "Defining one product data for a product," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(4), pages 489-520.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dubois, Louis-Etienne & Pine, B. Joseph & Harkonen, Janne, 2025. "Beyond the ephemeral: Scaling experiences through productization," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 121-128.
    2. Seppo Kuula & Harri Haapasalo & Arto Tolonen, 2018. "Cost-efficient co-creation of knowledge intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 779-808, December.
    3. Erno Mustonen & Jonne Seppänen & Arto Tolonen & Janne~Harkonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2020. "Product Portfolio Management Strategic Targets and KPIs over Life-Cycle: A Case Study in Telecommunications Business," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 18(1 (Spring), pages 5-23.
    4. Erno Mustonen & Arto Tolonen & Janne Härkönen & Harri Haapasalo, 2019. "Constructing a Joint Product Portfolio to Support Commercial Cooperation," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 8(1), pages 3-23.
    5. Janne Harkonen & Arto Tolonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2018. "Modelling of Construction Products and Services for Effective Productisation," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(4), pages 335-353.
    6. Zhu, Qingyun & Dhavale, Dileep G. & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuan, 2023. "Formalizing organizational product deletion through strategic cross-functional evaluation: A Bayesian analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. František Freiberg & David Michálek & Marek Nemec & Miroslav Žilka & George Cristian Gruia, 2011. "Survey Regarding The Level Of Product Lifecycle Management In Manufacturing Companies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 116-120, December.
    8. Frédéric Segonds & Julien Nelson & Améziane Aoussat, 2012. "PLM and architectural rehabilitation : a framework to improve collaboration in the early stages of design," Post-Print hal-00719169, HAL.
    9. Johannes Hofmeister & Dominik K. Kanbach & Jens Hogreve, 2024. "Measuring and managing service productivity: a meta-analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 739-775, March.
    10. Youngjung Geum & Moon-Soo Kim & Sungjoo Lee, 2017. "Service Technology: Definition and Characteristics Based on a Patent Database," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 147-166, June.
    11. Li, Ai Qiang & Kumar, Maneesh & Claes, Björn & Found, Pauline, 2020. "The state-of-the-art of the theory on Product-Service Systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Lee, Sunghee & Yoo, Shijin & Kim, Daeki, 2016. "When is servitization a profitable competitive strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 43-53.
    13. Burström, Thommie & Parida, Vinit & Lahti, Tom & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 85-95.
    14. Shahsavar, Aria & Sadeghi, J. Kiarash & Shockley, Jeff & Ojha, Divesh, 2021. "On the relationship between lean scheduling and economic performance in shipbuilding: A proposed model and comparative evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Marie-Anne Le-Dain & Lamiae Benhayoun & Judy Matthews & Marine Liard, 2023. "Barriers and opportunities of digital servitization for SMEs: the effect of smart Product-Service System business models," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 359-393, March.
    16. Saad Zighan & Moheeb Abualqumboz, 2022. "Dual focus: service-product orientation to manage the change paradox following servitization strategy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(1), pages 29-55, March.
    17. Pablo J. Moya-Fernández & Jean Pierre Seclen-Luna, 2024. "Evaluating the Effects of Information Sources on Innovation Outcomes: Are There Differences between KIBS and Manufacturing Firms from a Latin America Country?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4024-4055, March.
    18. Tolonen, Arto & Shahmarichatghieh, Marzieh & Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri, 2015. "Product portfolio management – Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 468-477.
    19. Nikolaus Kangas & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Harri Haapasalo & Tuomo Kinnunen, 2013. "Empirical Aspects on Defining Product Data for Rapid Productisation," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 109-130.
    20. Joni Koskinen, Tomi Kanniainen, Janne Harkonen, Harri Haapasalo, 2025. "Dynamic Pricing Model Factors: Configure-to-Order Product and Business-to-Business Sales Perspective," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 14, pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:jouijm:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:195-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.