IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i3p656-670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing accuracy and robustness of order promises

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Seitz
  • Martin Grunow

Abstract

Accurate order promising is a key requirement for customer satisfaction. Nevertheless, practitioners struggle with the reliability of the delivery dates they promise to customers. Consequently, the costs of demand fulfilment soar due to intensified communication, emergency processes in logistics and acquisition of costly external production resources. We identify and formalise product and process flexibilities in supply chains that can be exploited in production planning. Product flexibility is the possibility to produce several kinds of products from one predecessor product. Process flexibility is the possibility to use one production process to manufacture several products. In order to increase the accuracy and robustness of delivery dates, we develop an order promising methodology able to deal with demand mix uncertainty and heterogeneous customer order lead times. The approach anticipates changes in production plans made possible by product and process flexibilities. In a numerical study based on a case from the semiconductor industry, we demonstrate that our method increases the accuracy and robustness of order promises. For the studied case, we find that the consideration of process flexibility is more important for the generation of accurate and robust order promises than the consideration of product flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Seitz & Martin Grunow, 2017. "Increasing accuracy and robustness of order promises," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 656-670, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:3:p:656-670
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1195024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1195024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1195024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenying Zhao & Michael Ball & Masahiro Kotake, 2005. "Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 65-85, March.
    2. Tsai, Kune-muh & Wang, Shan-chi, 2009. "Multi-site available-to-promise modeling for assemble-to-order manufacturing: An illustration on TFT-LCD manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 174-184, January.
    3. Pibernik, Richard, 2005. "Advanced available-to-promise: Classification, selected methods and requirements for operations and inventory management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 239-252, January.
    4. Philip Kaminsky & Onur Kaya, 2009. "Combined make-to-order/make-to-stock supply chains," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 103-119.
    5. J. A. Buzacott & J. G. Shanthikumar, 1994. "Safety Stock versus Safety Time in MRP Controlled Production Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(12), pages 1678-1689, December.
    6. Janiak, Adam & Janiak, Władysław A. & Krysiak, Tomasz & Kwiatkowski, Tomasz, 2015. "A survey on scheduling problems with due windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 347-357.
    7. Hartmut Stadtler & Bernhard Fleischmann & Martin Grunow & Herbert Meyr & Christopher Sürie, 2012. "Advanced Planning in Supply Chains," Management for Professionals, Springer, number 978-3-642-24215-1, December.
    8. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Daganzo, Carlos, 2006. "Counteracting the bullwhip effect with decentralized negotiations and advance demand information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 14-23.
    9. Rema Hariharan & Paul Zipkin, 1995. "Customer-Order Information, Leadtimes, and Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1599-1607, October.
    10. Philip Kaminsky & Onur Kaya, 2008. "Scheduling and due‐date quotation in a make‐to‐order supply chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(5), pages 444-458, August.
    11. Cheng, T. C. E. & Gupta, M. C., 1989. "Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 156-166, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seitz, Alexander & Grunow, Martin & Akkerman, Renzo, 2020. "Data driven supply allocation to individual customers considering forecast bias," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seitz, Alexander & Grunow, Martin & Akkerman, Renzo, 2020. "Data driven supply allocation to individual customers considering forecast bias," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Liberopoulos, George, 2008. "On the tradeoff between optimal order-base-stock levels and demand lead-times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 136-155, October.
    3. Foad Mahdavi Pajouh & Dahai Xing & Yingjue Zhou & Sharethram Hariharan & Balabhaskar Balasundaram & Tieming Liu & Ramesh Sharda, 2013. "A Specialty Steel Bar Company Uses Analytics to Determine Available-to-Promise Dates," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 503-517, December.
    4. Yanfeng Ouyang & Carlos Daganzo, 2006. "Characterization of the Bullwhip Effect in Linear, Time-Invariant Supply Chains: Some Formulae and Tests," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1544-1556, October.
    5. Alexander Seitz & Hans Ehm & Renzo Akkerman & Sarah Osman, 2016. "A robust supply chain planning framework for revenue management in the semiconductor industry," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(6), pages 523-533, December.
    6. Mohammed Hichame Benbitour & Evren Sahin, 2015. "Evaluation of the Impact of Uncertain Advance Demand Information on Production/Inventory Systems," Post-Print hal-01199290, HAL.
    7. Yunqiang Yin & Du-Juan Wang & T C E Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Bi-criterion single-machine scheduling and due-window assignment with common flow allowances and resource-dependent processing times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(9), pages 1169-1183, September.
    8. Liberopoulos, George & Koukoumialos, Stelios, 2005. "Tradeoffs between base stock levels, numbers of kanbans, and planned supply lead times in production/inventory systems with advance demand information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 213-232, May.
    9. Feng, Haofang & Zhang, Sheng Hao & Zhang, Yong, 2023. "Managing production-inventory-maintenance systems with condition monitoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 698-711.
    10. Tong Wang & Beril L. Toktay, 2008. "Inventory Management with Advance Demand Information and Flexible Delivery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 716-732, April.
    11. Martin Josef Geiger & Sandra Huber & Sebastian Langton & Marius Leschik & Christian Lindorf & Ulrich Tüshaus, 2018. "Multi-attribute assignment of trains to departures in rolling stock management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1131-1163, December.
    12. Jana Ralfs & Gudrun P. Kiesmüller, 2022. "Inventory management with advance demand information and flexible shipment consolidation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1009-1044, December.
    13. Gössinger, Ralf & Kalkowski, Sonja, 2015. "Robust order promising with anticipated customer response," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 529-542.
    14. Jean-Philippe Gayon & Saif Benjaafar & Francis de Véricourt, 2009. "Using Imperfect Advance Demand Information in Production-Inventory Systems with Multiple Customer Classes," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 128-143, July.
    15. Altendorfer, Klaus & Minner, Stefan, 2011. "Simultaneous optimization of capacity and planned lead time in a two-stage production system with different customer due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 134-146, August.
    16. Zhenying Zhao & Michael Ball & Masahiro Kotake, 2005. "Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 65-85, March.
    17. Corti, Donatella & Pozzetti, Alessandro & Zorzini, Marta, 2006. "A capacity-driven approach to establish reliable due dates in a MTO environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 536-554, December.
    18. Alarcón, F. & Alemany, M.M.E. & Ortiz, A., 2009. "Conceptual framework for the characterization of the order promising process in a collaborative selling network context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 100-114, July.
    19. Wang, Zhaodong & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Bounded growth of the bullwhip effect under a class of nonlinear ordering policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 72-82.
    20. Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:3:p:656-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.