IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v8y2008i2p119-134.html

Methods for quantifying the benefits of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs)

Author

Listed:
  • HARALD WINKLER
  • NIKLAS HÖHNE
  • MICHEL DEN ELZEN

Abstract

How can the concept of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs) be operationalized in a multilateral climate regime? The strategic approach is to focus on policies and measures that are firmly within the national sustainable development priorities of developing countries but which, through the inclusion in an international climate framework, recognize, promote and support means of meeting these policy priorities on a lower-carbon trajectory. The concept of SD-PAMs is further elaborated in two ways: (1) possible methods for quantifying SD-PAMs and (2) policy design. An important step in operationalizing the concept of SD-PAMs is the examination of available methods to quantify their benefits. Four ways to quantify the effect of SD-PAMs on development and emissions are identified: (1) case studies, (2) national energy modelling, (3) analysis of sectoral data and (4) inclusion of policies in global emission allocation models. Each of the methodological approaches has its strengths and weaknesses, but these approaches are demonstrated as being capable of quantifying the effect of SD-PAMs on development and emissions. Formalizing the commitment of SD-PAMs could be aided by more fully elaborating these methodologies. Formal recognition could be given either by listing countries in an Annex to the Convention or by including the pledged policies in a dedicated register. Regular reporting on the sustainable development and climate benefits of SD-PAMs could take place through national communications or a separate reporting mechanism. Incentives for SD-PAMs could come from both climate and non-climate funding. Development funding through other agencies could also be mobilized. International finance will be critical, as will the mobilization of domestic investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Harald Winkler & Niklas Höhne & Michel Den Elzen, 2008. "Methods for quantifying the benefits of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs)," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 119-134, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:8:y:2008:i:2:p:119-134
    DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3763/cpol.2007.0433
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3763/cpol.2007.0433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Baumert & Odile Blanchard & S. Llosa & James F. Perkaus, 2002. "Building on the Kyoto Protocol : options for protecting the climate," Post-Print halshs-00196316, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Li, 2011. "Supporting greenhouse gas mitigation in developing cities: a synthesis of financial instruments," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 677-698, August.
    2. Elmar Kriegler & Jae Edmonds & Stéphane Hallegatte & Kristie Ebi & Tom Kram & Keywan Riahi & Harald Winkler & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 401-414, February.
    3. Gabriela Ileana Iacobuţă & Niklas Höhne & Heleen Laura van Soest & Rik Leemans, 2021. "Transitioning to Low-Carbon Economies under the 2030 Agenda: Minimizing Trade-Offs and Enhancing Co-Benefits of Climate-Change Action for the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Schneider, Malte & Hendrichs, Holger & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2010. "Navigating the global carbon market: An analysis of the CDM's value chain and prevalent business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 277-287, January.
    5. Anya Boyd & Britta Rennkamp & Anthony James Dane & Harald Winkler, 2014. "Current approaches to MRV in South Africa: a scoping study," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 397-416, May.
    6. Jianfu Wang & Shiping Jin & Weiguo Bai & Yongliang Li & Yuhui Jin, 2016. "Comparative analysis of the international carbon verification policies and systems," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 381-397, November.
    7. Harald Winkler & Anya Boyd & Marta Torres Gunfaus & Stefan Raubenheimer, 2015. "Reconsidering development by reflecting on climate change," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 369-385, November.
    8. Lim, Jaekyu, 2011. "Impacts and implications of implementing voluntary greenhouse gas emission reduction targets in major countries and Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5086-5095, September.
    9. Eduardo Medeiros & Bernardo Valente & Vasco Gonçalves & Paula Castro, 2022. "How Impactful Are Public Policies on Environmental Sustainability? Debating the Portuguese Case of PO SEUR 2014–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Buchner & Carlo Carraro, 2004. "Economic and environmental effectiveness of a technology-based climate protocol," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 229-248, September.
    2. Winkler, Harald & Baumert, Kevin & Blanchard, Odile & Burch, Sarah & Robinson, John, 2007. "What factors influence mitigative capacity?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 692-703, January.
    3. Onno Kuik & Jeroen Aerts & Frans Berkhout & Frank Biermann & Jos Bruggink & Joyeeta Gupta & Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "Post-2012 climate policy dilemmas: a review of proposals," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 317-336, May.
    4. Tsikalakis, A.G. & Hatziargyriou, N.D., 2007. "Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3395-3409, June.
    5. Sterk, Wolfgang & Arens, Christof & Beuermann, Christiane & Bongardt, Daniel & Borbonus, Sylvia & Dienst, Carmen & Eichhorst, Urda & Kiyar, Dagmar & Luhmann, Hans-Jochen & Ott, Hermann E. & Rudolph, F, 2009. "Towards an effective and equitable climate change agreement: A Wuppertal proposal for Copenhagen," Wuppertal Spezial, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 40, number 40.
    6. Laura Silvia Valente Macedo & Pedro Roberto Jacobi, 2019. "Subnational politics of the urban age: evidence from Brazil on integrating global climate goals in the municipal agenda," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Andries Hof & Michel Elzen & Detlef Vuuren, 2010. "Including adaptation costs and climate change damages in evaluating post-2012 burden-sharing regimes," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 19-40, January.
    8. Jonas O. Meckling & Gu Yoon Chung, 2009. "Sectoral approaches for a post-2012 climate regime: a taxonomy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 652-668, November.
    9. Frank Jotzo, 2006. "Quantifying uncertainties for emission targets," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0603, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    10. Harald Winkler & Lavanya Rajamani, 2014. "CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 102-121, January.
    11. Andrew Kerr Macintosh, 2012. "LULUCF in the post-2012 regime: fixing the problems of the past?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 341-355, May.
    12. Sandrine Mathy, 2014. "Millennium goals and Climate-Change negotiations : for a climate and development convergence mechanism," Working Papers hal-01083818, HAL.
    13. Frank Jotzo & John Pezzey, 2007. "Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 38(2), pages 259-284, October.
    14. Marwa Hannouf & Getachew Assefa, 2017. "The Role of Sustainability Resources of Large Greenhouse Gas Emitters: The Case of Corporations in Alberta, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Carraro, Carlo & Buchner, Barbara, 2005. "Regional and Sub-Global Climate Blocs. A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Bottom-up Climate Regimes," CEPR Discussion Papers 5034, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Frank Jotzo, 2004. "Developing countries and the future of the Kyoto Protocol," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0406, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    17. Atle Christer Christiansen, 2003. "Convergence or divergence? Status and prospects for US climate strategy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 343-358, December.
    18. Harald Winkler & Mark Howells & Kevin Baumert, 2007. "Sustainable development policies and measures: institutional issues and electrical efficiency in South Africa," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 212-229, May.
    19. Wolfgang Buchholz & Wolfgang Peters, 2005. "A Rawlsian Approach to International Cooperation," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 25-44, February.
    20. Nigel Key & Gregoire Tallard, 2012. "Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 387-414, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:8:y:2008:i:2:p:119-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.