IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7917-d851365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Impactful Are Public Policies on Environmental Sustainability? Debating the Portuguese Case of PO SEUR 2014–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Medeiros

    (DINÂMIA’CET-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Portugal-Avenida das Forças Armadas, Edifício Sedas Nunes, Sala 2W4-d, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Bernardo Valente

    (CIS-Iscte, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Avenida das Forças Armadas, Edifício Sedas Nunes, Sala 2W08, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Vasco Gonçalves

    (DINÂMIA’CET-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Portugal-Avenida das Forças Armadas, Edifício Sedas Nunes, Sala 2W4-d, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Paula Castro

    (CIS-Iscte, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Avenida das Forças Armadas, Edifício Sedas Nunes, Sala 2W08, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Sustainable development is a key feature of national, European Union and global development strategies. The main research goal is to provide evidence on how impactful public policies on environmental sustainability in Portugal are at the regional level, in various policy areas. In this context, this paper analyses the main impacts of the Portuguese Operational Programme for Sustainability and Efficient Use of Resources (PO SEUR 2014–20). The research uses a territorial impact assessment (TIA) methodology (TARGET_TIA) to assess these impacts in five analytic dimensions (economy with low emissions, adaptation to climate change, risk prevention and management, environmental protection and resource efficiency) in the five mainland Portuguese NUTS 2. It concludes that, in overall terms, PO SEUR produced low to moderate positive impacts in all NUTS II and analysed dimensions, but it was particularly positive in measures fostering adaptation to climate change, and less impactful in measures supporting an economy with low emissions and resource efficiency in Portugal. Despite data limitations, the research provided adequate evidence that key public policies supporting environmental sustainability in Portugal are largely ineffective and inefficient in view of their policy goals and allocated funding. To turn this scenario around, the process of project selection needs to undergo significant improvements to better adjust the regional needs on environmental sustainability-related issues to the available funding. Moreover, on a policy strategic level, there needs to be support for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy in Portugal via concrete actions exploring environmental capital and a green economy in urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Medeiros & Bernardo Valente & Vasco Gonçalves & Paula Castro, 2022. "How Impactful Are Public Policies on Environmental Sustainability? Debating the Portuguese Case of PO SEUR 2014–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7917-:d:851365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mota, P. & Pinto, J.P., 2014. "Wave energy potential along the western Portuguese coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 8-17.
    2. Eduardo Medeiros & Arno Van Der Zwet, 2020. "Evaluating Integrated Sustainable Urban Development Strategies: a methodological framework applied in Portugal," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 563-582, March.
    3. de la Horra, Luis P. & Perote, Javier & de la Fuente, Gabriel, 2021. "Monetary policy and corporate investment: A panel-data analysis of transmission mechanisms in contexts of high uncertainty," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 609-624.
    4. Naja Marot & Mojca Golobič & Thomas B. Fischer, 2020. "The ESPON EATIA: A Qualitative Approach to Territorial Impact Assessment," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Eduardo Medeiros (ed.), Territorial Impact Assessment, chapter 5, pages 77-99, Springer.
    5. Almeida, Maria Antónia, 2020. "The use of rural areas in Portugal: Historical perspective and the new trends," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 29(2), pages 1-17.
    6. Katja Freistein & Bettina Mahlert, 2016. "The potential for tackling inequality in the Sustainable Development Goals," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(12), pages 2139-2155, December.
    7. Eduardo Medeiros, 2020. "Portugal 2020: An Effective Policy Platform to Promote Sustainable Territorial Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Harald Winkler & Niklas Höhne & Michel Den Elzen, 2008. "Methods for quantifying the benefits of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs)," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 119-134, March.
    9. Eduardo Medeiros & Daniel Rauhut, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion Cities: a policy recipe for achieving Territorial Cohesion?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 120-128, January.
    10. Rainer Quitzow, 2013. "Towards an integrated approach to promoting environmental innovation and national competitiveness," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 277-296, October.
    11. Danijela Despotovic & Slobodan Cvetanovic & Vladimir Nedic & Milan Despotovic, 2016. "Economic, social and environmental dimension of sustainable competitiveness of European countries," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(9), pages 1656-1678, September.
    12. José Alberto Fuinhas & Matheus Koengkan & Nuno Silva & Emad Kazemzadeh & Anna Auza & Renato Santiago & Mônica Teixeira & Fariba Osmani, 2022. "The Impact of Energy Policies on the Energy Efficiency Performance of Residential Properties in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Claire Colomb & Gonçalo Santinha, 2014. "European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Le," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 459-480, March.
    14. Roberto Camagni, 2020. "The Pioneering Quantitative Model for TIA: TEQUILA," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Eduardo Medeiros (ed.), Territorial Impact Assessment, chapter 3, pages 27-54, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernardo Valente & Erika Džajić Uršič, 2025. "An Ex Ante Approach to the Resilience and Recovery Plan’s Impacts on Sustainable Tourism in Algarve and Alentejo," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Álvarez-Antelo, David & López-Muñoz, Paola & Llases, Luis & Lauer, Arthur, 2025. "Towards a sustainable mobility lifestyle: Exploring the flight to rail shift through model-based behavioural change scenarios," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Medeiros, 2020. "Portugal 2020: An Effective Policy Platform to Promote Sustainable Territorial Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Eduardo Medeiros & Arno van der Zwet, 2020. "Sustainable and Integrated Urban Planning and Governance in Metropolitan and Medium-Sized Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Hassan Satti, 2023. "Towards Inclusive Dialogue: Reshaping Development Communication for Holistic Societal Growth," Magna Carta: Contemporary Social Science, 50sea, vol. 2(3), pages 142-152, September.
    4. Pedro Chamusca, 2023. "Public Policies for Territorial Cohesion and Sustainability in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Camelia-Cristina Dragomir & Diana Foriş & Aurel Mihail Ţîţu & Tiberiu Foriş, 2020. "The Role of Intermediaries in Supporting Collaboration for Sustainability: A Model of Commissioning Intervention in the Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Eduardo Medeiros, 2021. "The Global Development Formula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás & Ana Isabel Lillebø & Helena Vieira, 2025. "Holding Sustainability Promises in Politics: Trends in Ecosystem and Resource Management in Electoral Party Manifestos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-38, July.
    8. Navío-Marco, Julio & Rodrigo-Moya, Beatriz & Gerli, Paolo, 2020. "The rising importance of the "Smart territory" concept: definition and implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Belayet Hossain, 2025. "Does Government Environmental Expenditure Reduce Residential Energy Consumption in Canada? Evidence from Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Bertram, D.V. & Tarighaleslami, A.H. & Walmsley, M.R.W. & Atkins, M.J. & Glasgow, G.D.E., 2020. "A systematic approach for selecting suitable wave energy converters for potential wave energy farm sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Rafał Nagaj & Brigita Žuromskaitė-Nagaj & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2024. "The Influence of the Global Energy Crisis on Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-51, February.
    12. Sierra, J.P. & Martín, C. & Mösso, C. & Mestres, M. & Jebbad, R., 2016. "Wave energy potential along the Atlantic coast of Morocco," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 20-32.
    13. Catalin GRADINARU & Sorin-George TOMA & Stefan CATANA, 2021. "Sustainability And Competitiveness At The Global Level: An Analysis Of The Top 10 Countries In The Period 2018-2020," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 6(3), pages 121-128.
    14. Pedro Plasencia-Lozano, 2021. "An Ex Ante Analysis of the Planned Transportation Network in the Region of Extremadura (Spain) by Using Physical Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    15. Matheus Koengkan & Nuno Silva & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2023. "Assessing Energy Performance Certificates for Buildings: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of Portuguese Municipalities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, April.
    16. Salvatore Flavio Pileggi, 2023. "Walking Together Indicator (WTI): Understanding and Measuring World Inequality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Valentina Vannucchi & Lorenzo Cappietti, 2016. "Wave Energy Assessment and Performance Estimation of State of the Art Wave Energy Converters in Italian Hotspots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Quitzow, Rainer, 2015. "Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: A review of India's National Solar Mission," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 233-243.
    19. Anvar Tulaganov & Gulnara Sagindykova & Murad Isaev & Bibigul Bimbetova & Maira Kaiyrgaliyeva & Bakhitzhamal Aidosova & Aizhan Orynbassarova, 2022. "The Impact Analysis of Electricity Prices on the Energy Intensity of the Kazakhstani Economy and Sustainable Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 241-248, March.
    20. Andreea-Oana Iacobuță & Mihaela Ifrim, 2020. "Welfare Mentality as a Challenge to European Sustainable Development. What Role for Youth Inclusion and Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7917-:d:851365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.