IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v20y2020is1ps39-s57.html

The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Wood
  • Karsten Neuhoff
  • Dan Moran
  • Moana Simas
  • Michael Grubb
  • Konstantin Stadler

Abstract

Policy to reduce the European Union’s (EU) carbon footprint needs to be grounded in an understanding of the structure and drivers of both the domestic and internationally traded components. Here we analyse consumption-based emission accounts (for the main greenhouse gases (GHGs)) for the EU, focusing on understanding sectoral contributions and what changes have been observed over the last two decades, including the role of trade. The EU28 has reduced its overall GHG footprint by 8% over the two decades, mainly due to the use of more efficient technology, both at home and abroad. Emissions embodied in imports, which make up one-third of the EU28 GHG footprint, grew strongly until 2008 but have stabilized in volume since. Foreign production has been more emissions intensive than if goods were produced in the EU. However, the overall contribution of this effect is small, offset by much larger (global) technological improvements and growths in consumption. Hence the focus should now be on accounting and responsibility for enacting change, not the global impact of trade. Finally, the inclusion of non-CO2 GHGs in the analysis shows their importance in the traded element, particularly for the mining and agricultural sectors.Key policy insights The total EU carbon footprint has reduced since 2007, but at a slower rate than production-based emissions, and rarely faster than GDP growth.Consumption growth has had a much greater impact on the EU carbon footprint than the offshoring of production.Trade in both directions (imports and exports) is important for the manufacturing sector. The data does not support claims of wholesale ‘de-industrialisation’ but rather reflects increased trade intensity related to specialization.Several (but not all) of the major sources of net embodied imports are largely unavoidable consequences of European consumption because the primary production activities (e.g. mining and significant shares of agricultural) could not realistically occur within the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Wood & Karsten Neuhoff & Dan Moran & Moana Simas & Michael Grubb & Konstantin Stadler, 2020. "The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(S1), pages 39-57, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:20:y:2020:i:s1:p:s39-s57
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1639489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639489
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nagashima, Fumiya & Tokito, Shohei & Hanaka, Tesshu, 2025. "Identifying the driving forces of embodied emissions from intermediate goods export," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Seyi Saint Akadiri & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Obioma Chinenyenwa Asuzu & Ijeoma Christina Onuogu & Izuchukwu Oji-Okoro, 2023. "Testing the role of economic complexity on the ecological footprint in China: a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(7), pages 2290-2316, November.
    3. Zhu, Qingyuan & Xu, Chengzhen & Pan, Yinghao & Wu, Jie, 2024. "Identifying critical transmission sectors, paths, and carbon communities for CO2 mitigation in global supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Theine, Hendrik & Humer, Stefan & Moser, Mathias & Schnetzer, Matthias, 2022. "Emissions inequality: Disparities in income, expenditure, and the carbon footprint in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Niko Korpar & Mario Larch & Roman Stöllinger, 2022. "Comparing Scenarios for a European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Trade, FDI and Welfare Effects with a Focus on the Austrian Economy," FIW Research Reports series y:2022:m:06, FIW.
    6. Córcoles, Carmen & López, Luis Antonio & Osorio, Pilar & Zafrilla, Jorge, 2024. "The carbon footprint of the empty Castilla-La Mancha," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Wang, Jieyu & Shan, Yuli & Cui, Can & Zhao, Congyu & Meng, Jing & Wang, Shaojian, 2024. "Investigating the fast energy-related carbon emissions growth in African countries and its drivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    8. Menghan Zhang & Suocheng Dong & Fujia Li & Shuangjie Xu & Kexin Guo & Qian Liu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Improvement Measures of Embodied Carbon Emissions in Interprovincial Trade for Coal Energy Supply Bases: Case Study of Anhui, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Lena Kilian & Anne Owen & Andy Newing & Diana Ivanova, 2022. "Exploring Transport Consumption-Based Emissions: Spatial Patterns, Social Factors, Well-Being, and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Li, Rongrong & Wang, Qiang & Wang, Xuefeng & Zhou, Yulin & Han, Xinyu & Liu, Yi, 2022. "Germany's contribution to global carbon reduction might be underestimated – A new assessment based on scenario analysis with and without trade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Wang, Yihan & Xiong, Siqin & Ma, Xiaoming, 2022. "Carbon inequality in global trade: Evidence from the mismatch between embodied carbon emissions and value added," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Antoine Teixeira & Julien Lefèvre, 2025. "Global supply chains and domestic climate policy Addressing the substantial material-related carbon footprint of final consumption in France," Post-Print hal-04985312, HAL.
    13. Yingying Du & Haibin Liu & Hui Huang, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress and Trends on Carbon Emission Responsibility Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Duarte, Rosa & Miranda-Buetas, Sara & Sarasa, Cristina, 2021. "Household consumption patterns and income inequality in EU countries: Scenario analysis for a fair transition towards low-carbon economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. Wang, Jun & Usman, Muhammad & Saqib, Najia & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hossain, Mohammad Razib, 2023. "Asymmetric environmental performance under economic complexity, globalization and energy consumption: Evidence from the World's largest economically complex economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Justas Streimikis & Z. Y. Shen & Tomas Balezentis, 2024. "Does the energy-related greenhouse gas emission abatement cost depend on the optimization direction: shadow pricing based on the weak disposability technology in the European Union agriculture," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(3), pages 593-619, September.
    17. Yuan, Quanxi & Wang, Qingchun & Zhang, Meichen, 2024. "Tracing changes in manufacturing-related carbon emissions: A structural decomposition analysis from the perspective of China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 568-581.
    18. Yang, Yafei & Wang, Hui & Löschel, Andreas & Zhou, Peng, 2022. "Patterns and determinants of carbon emission flows along the Belt and Road from 2005 to 2030," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Karen Richardsen Moberg & Benjamin K. Sovacool & Alexandra Goritz & Gaëtan M. Hinojosa & Carlo Aall & Maria Nilsson, 2021. "Barriers, emotions, and motivational levers for lifestyle transformation in Norwegian household decarbonization pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:20:y:2020:i:s1:p:s39-s57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.