IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Spatial approach to sustainable development: Challenges of equity and efficacy

  • Bertrand Zuindeau

Zuindeau B. (2006) Spatial approach to sustainable development: challenges of equity and efficacy, Regional Studies 40, 459-470. Examining sustainable development by favouring a spatial approach leads one to modify the definition of the challenges relating to this issue. The present paper considers the two challenges of equity and efficacy, and it tries to specify the variables that influence each of them in a spatial approach. In order to do this, it draws on the existing literature, highlighting the differences in treatment depending on the approach, and also stressing the weaknesses. Overall, it is believed that the spatial dimension exacerbates the contradictions that arise from the implementation of sustainable development, in particular the contradictions that are likely to appear between a logic of sustainability and a logic of competitiveness. The paper concludes by examining the question of governance. Zuindeau B. (2006) Approche spatiale du developpement durable: enjeux d'equite et d'efficacite, Regional Studies 40, 459-470. S'interesser au developpment durable, en privilegiant une optique spatiale, conduit a modifier la definition des enjeux relatifs a cette problematique. Le present article s'interesse aux deux enjeux que sont l'equite et l'efficacite et tente de preciser les variables qui, dans une perspective spatiale, les influencent l'une et l'autre. Pour ce faire, l'article s'appuie sur la litterature existante, montrant en l'occurrence les differences de traitement selon les approches et indiquant aussi les manques en la matiere. Au total, il apparait que la dimension spatiale exacerbe les contradictions qui naissent de la mise en œuvre du developpment durable, en particulier les contradictions susceptibles d'apparaitre entre une logique de durabilite et une logique de competitivite. L'article conclut sur la question de la gouvernance. Developpement durable, Approche spatiale, Equite, Efficacite Zuindeau B. (2006) Raumlicher Ansatz zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Herausforderung der Billigkeit und Wirksamkeit, Regional Studies 40, 459-490. Die Untersuchung nachhaltiger Entwicklung durch Bevorzugung eines raumlichen Ansatzes fuhrt zur Modifikation der Definition der diesbezuglichen Herausforderungen. In diesem Aufsatz werden die beiden Herausforderungen der Billigkeit und Wirksamkeit in der Absicht berucksichtigt, die Veranderlichen, die sie beide beeinflussen, in einem raumlichen Ansatz zu bestimmen. Zu diesem Zwecke wird Bezug auf die vorhandene Literatur genommen, wobei die unterschiedlichen Ansatze der Behandlung herausgestellt, und auch die Schwachen betont werden. Es wird die Aufflassung vertreten, dass die raumliche Dimension im grossen und ganzen die Widerspruche verscharft, die sich aus der Durchfuhrung nachhaltiger Entwicklung ergeben, vorallem die Widerspruche, die wahrscheinlich zwischen einer Logik der Nachhaltigkeit und einer Logik der Wettbewerbsfahigkeit auftreten. Abschliessend wird die Frage der Regierungsgewalt untersucht. Nachhaltige Entwicklung, Raumliche Ansatz, Billigkeit, Wirksamkeit Zuindeau B. (2006) Planteamiento espacial del desarrollo sostenible. Los desafios de la equidad y la eficacia, Regional Studies 40, 459-490. Si examinamos el desarrollo sostenible defendiendo un enfoque espacial tenemos que modificar la definicion de los desafios de este desarrollo. En este ensayo consideramos los dos desafios de equidad y eficacia e intentamos especificar las variables que influyen en cada una de ellas segun un planteamiento espacial. Para ello nos basamos en la literatura actual, resaltando las diferencias en el tratamiento en funcion del enfoque y tambien nos centramos en las debilidades. En general, creemos que la dimension espacial agrava las contradicciones que surgen de aplicar el desarrollo sostenible, especialmente en las contradicciones que pueden aparecer entre una logica de sostenibilidad y una logica de competitividad. Para terminar examinamos la cuestion de la gobernanza. Desarrollo sostenible, Enfoque espacial, Equidad, Eficacia

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400600757437
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
Pages: 459-470

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:5:p:459-470
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20

Order Information: Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRES20

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Ferng, Jiun-Jiun, 2005. "Local sustainable yield and embodied resources in ecological footprint analysis--a case study on the required paddy field in Taiwan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 415-430, May.
  2. W Neil Adger & Katrina Brown & Jenny Fairbrass & Andrew Jordan & Jouni Paavola & Sergio Rosendo & Gill Seyfang, 2003. "Governance for sustainability: towards a 'thick' analysis of environmental decisionmaking," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 35(6), pages 1095-1110, June.
  3. Matthew Paterson & David Humphreys & Lloyd Pettiford, 2003. "Conceptualizing Global Environmental Governance: From Interstate Regimes to Counter-Hegemonic Struggles," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, 05.
  4. Paul Chatterton, 2002. "'Be Realistic: Demand the Impossible'. Moving Towards 'Strong' Sustainable Development in an Old Industrial Region?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 552-561.
  5. van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. & Verbruggen, Harmen, 1999. "Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the 'ecological footprint'," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 61-72, April.
  6. Ekins, Paul & Folke, Carl & De Groot, Rudolf, 2003. "Identifying critical natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2-3), pages 159-163, March.
  7. Andr Torre Shaw & Jean-Pierre Gilly, 2000. "On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 169-180.
  8. Camagni, Roberto & Capello, Roberta & Nijkamp, Peter, 1998. "Towards sustainable city policy: an economy-environment technology nexus," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 103-118, January.
  9. Ekins, Paul, 2003. "Identifying critical natural capital: Conclusions about critical natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2-3), pages 277-292, March.
  10. Susan Park, 2005. "The New Accountability: Environmental Responsibility across Borders," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 5(4), pages 130-131, November.
  11. Nijkamp, Peter & Vreeker, Ron, 2000. "Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 7-27, April.
  12. J. Martinez-Alier, 1993. "Distributional Obstacles to International Environmental Policy: The Failures at Rio and Prospects after Rio," Environmental Values, White Horse Press, vol. 2(2), pages 97-114, May.
  13. Andersson, Jan Otto & Lindroth, Mattias, 2001. "Ecologically unsustainable trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 113-122, April.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:5:p:459-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.