IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8549-d605638.html

Impacts of Arsenal Brownfield Regeneration on Urban Development of Tivat in Montenegro: From Industrial Settlement to Center of Nautical Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Ema Alihodžić Jašarović

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Svetlana Perović

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Sanja Paunović Žarić

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

Abstract

This study investigated the main aspects and consequences of urban regeneration in the context of sustainable development, using the example of the town of Tivat, whose radical urban transformation was initiated in the post-referendum transition period after 2006, when decision-making policies created a new environment for development. The focus of the research was the impact of the Arsenal brownfield regeneration on the urban development of Tivat in Montenegro, following its decades-long transformations from industrial settlements (military shipyard) to the “new town” of Porto Montenegro (the center of nautical tourism), which is 10 km away from the UNESCO World Heritage site in Kotor, which had a strong influence on the development of Tivat. The theoretical and empirical research was focused on three aspects of sustainability. This study identifies key parameters that indicate the specific causes and consequences of the urban transformations, as well as impacts of nautical tourism on the development of a particular tourist destination with accompanying sustainability factors. The urban regeneration of Tivat, as an example of an urban laboratory in the Mediterranean, can be used for comparative measurements of the success of the brownfield process of regeneration of various tourist destinations in the context of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ema Alihodžić Jašarović & Svetlana Perović & Sanja Paunović Žarić, 2021. "Impacts of Arsenal Brownfield Regeneration on Urban Development of Tivat in Montenegro: From Industrial Settlement to Center of Nautical Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-34, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8549-:d:605638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr Lorens & Łukasz Bugalski, 2021. "Reshaping the Gdańsk Shipyard—The Birthplace of the Solidarity Movement. The Complexity of Adaptive Reuse in the Heritage Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Umberto Mecca & Paolo Piantanida & Francesco Prizzon & Manuela Rebaudengo, 2019. "Impact of Brownfield Sites on Local Energy Production as Resilient Response to Land Contamination: A Case Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Aleksandra Djukić & Jelena Marić & Branislav Antonić & Vladimir Kovač & Jugoslav Joković & Nikola Dinkić, 2020. "The Evaluation of Urban Renewal Waterfront Development: The Case of the Sava Riverfront in Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Bertrand Zuindeau, 2006. "Spatial approach to sustainable development: Challenges of equity and efficacy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 459-470.
    5. Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & Arminda Almeida & Nuno Sousa & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2019. "A Case Study Driven Integrated Methodology to Support Sustainable Urban Regeneration Planning and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ & Svetlana K. Perović, 2021. "Demolition-Based Urban Regeneration from a Post-Socialist Perspective: Case Study of a Neighborhood in Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ, 2022. "Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Giovanni Peira & Giacomo Pasino & Alessandro Bonadonna & Riccardo Beltramo, 2022. "A UNESCO Site as a Tool to Promote Local Attractiveness: Investigating Stakeholders’ Opinions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Zoran Kovačević & Senka Šekularac-Ivošević, 2022. "Management Framework for Sustainable Nautical Destination Development: The Case of Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miloš Aranđelović & Aleksandar Videnović & Nebojša Gadžić & Dušan Tomanović, 2022. "Repurposing and the Impact of New Facilities on the Potential Presentation of Industrial Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Jue Wang & Yi Yang & Huan Huang & Fan Wang, 2022. "Stakeholder Management in Government-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Eastern Suburbs in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Li, Mengxu & Liu, Jianghua & Chen, Yang & Yang, Zhijiu, 2023. "Can sustainable development strategy reduce income inequality in resource-based regions? A natural resource dependence perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Xiaojia Liu & Xi Chen & Yan Huang & Weihong Wang & Mingkan Zhang & Yang Jin, 2023. "Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Xiaowen Wu & Xinru Li, 2025. "Multi-Source Data-Driven Quality Assessment of Waterfront Public Spaces in Urban Contexts," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Shen, Liyin & Liu, Yan & Ren, Yitian & Wong, Siu Wai, 2024. "A methodological framework for analysing the justice phenomenon embedded in urban regeneration: A Chinese perspective based at the project level," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Vaida Vabuolytė & Marija Burinskienė & Sílvia Sousa & Olga Petrakovska & Mykola Trehub & Michela Tiboni, 2021. "Increase in the Value Added of Land Due to the Establishment of Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Nishita Dsouza & Anitha Devadason & Araliya M. Senerat & Patrin Watanatada & David Rojas-Rueda & Giselle Sebag, 2023. "Sustainability and Equity in Urban Development (S&EUD): A Content Analysis of “Bright Spots” from the Accelerating City Equity (ACE) Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Ali Tanrıkul & Şebnem Hoşkara, 2019. "A New Framework for the Regeneration Process of Mediterranean Historic City Centres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Luca Salvati, 2016. "The Dark Side of the Crisis: Disparities in per Capita income (2000–12) and the Urban-Rural Gradient in Greece," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 628-641, December.
    11. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2021. "The Assessment of Density Bonus in Building Renovation Interventions. The Case of the City of Florence in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Rachel Levy & Damien Talbot, 2015. "Control by proximity: Evidence from the 'Aerospace Valley' Competitiveness Cluster," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 955-972, June.
    14. Justyna Przywojska, 2021. "Polish Local Government’s Perspective on Revitalisation: A Framework for Future Socially Sustainable Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Andy Pike, 2007. "Editorial: Whither Regional Studies?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1143-1148.
    16. Youngeun Kang & Keonhyeong Kim & Jeahyun Jung & Seungwoo Son & Eujin-Julia Kim, 2020. "How Vulnerable Are Urban Regeneration Sites to Climate Change in Busan, South Korea?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Nikolaos Triantafyllopoulos, 2024. "Investigating Energy Renovation of Multi-Owner Buildings and Real Estate Market Issues in a Degraded Greek Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-33, March.
    18. Zuindeau, Bertrand, 2009. "Responding to environmental risks: What can Albert Hirschman contribute?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 155-165, November.
    19. Can Kara & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2022. "Modelling and Assessing Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Historic Urban Quarters via Analytical Hierarchy Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Yujia Zhu & Jusheng Song & Yunxi Bai, 2024. "China’s Urban Regeneration Evolution from 1949 to 2022: From the Perspective of Governance Mode," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8549-:d:605638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.