IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The border effect in Spain: The Basque Country case

Listed author(s):
  • Salvador Gil-Pareja
  • Rafael Llorca-Vivero
  • Jose Martinez-Serrano

Gil-Pareja S., Llorca-Vivero R. and Martinez-Serrano J. A. (2006) The border effect in Spain: the Basque Country case, Regional Studies 40, 335-345. This paper investigates the border effect on the Basque Country's trade, using a sample of 28 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries between 1995 and 2001. The results indicate that after controlling for market size and distance, the Basque Country trades between 12 and 16 times more with the rest of Spain than it does with any other country. The Spanish bias is lower in the case of the Basque Country's exports than in the case of imports. With respect to the time evolution, the results show a downward trend. The analysis by trading partners reveals important differences even in the context of European Union countries. Gil-Pareja S., Llorca-Vivero R. et Martinez-Serrano J. A. (2006) L'effet frontiere en Espagne: etude de cas du pays Basque, Regional Studies 40, 335-345. A partir d'un echantillon de 28 pays-membres de l'OCDE, cet article cherche a examiner l'effet frontiere sur le commerce du pays Basque entre 1995 et 2001. Compte tenu de la taille du marche et de la distance, les resultats laissent voir que le commerce du pays Basque se fait de 12 a 16 fois plus avec le reste de l'Espagne qu'il ne se fait avec les pays tiers. Le biais espagnol est moins evident pour ce qui est du taux d'exportation du pays Basque par rapport au taux d'importation. Quant aux tendances sous-jacentes, les resultats laissent voir une tendance a la baisse. L'analyse de la ventilation du commerce laisse voir d'importantes differences, meme pour ce qui est des pays-membres de l'Ue. Effet frontiere Pays Basque Taux d'exportation Taux d'importation Gil-Pareja S., Llorca-Vivero R. und Martinez-Serrano J. A. (2006) Der Grenzeffekt in Spanien: der Fall des Baskenlandes, Regional Studies 40, 335-345. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht die Auswirkung der Grenze auf den Handel im Baskenland, wobei er sich auf eine Stichprobe von 28 OECD Landern im Zeitraum 1995-2001 stutzt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nach Berucksichtigung des Handelsvolumens und der Entfernung das Baskenland zwolf bis zu sechzehn mal soviel Handel mit dem ubrigen Spanien treibt wie mit irgend einem anderen Land. Die spanische Ausrichtung auf das Baskenland erweist sich als geringer betreff baskischer Exporte als im Fall von Importen. Hinsichtlich Entwicklung des Handels im Laufe der Zeit weisen die Ergebnisse eine abnehmende Tendenz auf. Im Hinblick auf Handelspartner lasst die Analyse sogar im Zusammenhang mit EU Landern bedeutende Unterschiede erkennen. Grenzeffekt Baskenland Ausfuhren Einfuhren Gil-Pareja S., Llorca-Vivero R. y Martinez-Serrano J. A. (2006) El efecto frontera en Espana: el caso del Pais Vasco, Regional Studies 40, 335-345. Este articulo investiga el efecto frontera en el comercio del Pais Vasco utilizando una muestra de 28 paises de la OCDE que comprende el periodo 1995-2001. Los resultados indican que, tras controlar por el tamano del mercado y la distancia, el Pais Vasco comercia entre 12 y 16 veces mas con el resto de Espana que con cualquier otro pais de la muestra. El sesgo espanol es menor en el caso de las exportaciones que en el de las importaciones del Pais Vasco. Con respecto a la evolucion temporal, los resultados revelan una tendencia descendente en la magnitud del sesgo domestico. El analisis por socios comerciales muestra diferencias importantes incluso en el contexto de los paises de la Union Europea. Efecto fronterizo El Pais Vasco Exportaciones Importaciones

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 335-345

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:4:p:335-345
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600725186
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
  2. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H, 1985. "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(3), pages 474-481, August.
  3. Alejandro Micco & Ernesto Stein & Guillermo Ordoñez, 2003. "The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from EMU," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 18(37), pages 315-356, October.
  4. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H, 1989. "The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 143-153, February.
  5. David Barr & Francis Breedon & David Miles, 2003. "Life on the outside: economic conditions and prospects outside euroland," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 18(37), pages 573-613, October.
  6. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2000. "Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 136(2), pages 284-314, June.
  7. Russell H. Hillberry, 2002. "Aggregation bias, compositional change, and the border effect," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 35(3), pages 517-530, August.
  8. John F. Helliwell, 1996. "Do National Borders Matter for Quebec's Trade?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 507-522, August.
  9. Simon J. Evenett & Wolfgang Keller, 2002. "On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(2), pages 281-316, April.
  10. McCallum, John, 1995. "National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 615-623, June.
  11. Sergio de Nardis & Claudio Vicarelli, 2003. "The Impact of Euro on Trade: The (Early) Effect is not so Large," ISAE Working Papers 31, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY).
  12. Volker Nitsch, 2000. "National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1091-1105, November.
  13. Anderson, Michael A & Smith, Stephen L S, 1999. "Do National Borders Really Matter? Canada-US Regional Trade Reconsidered," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 219-227, May.
  14. John F. Helliwell, 1997. "National Borders, Trade and Migration," NBER Working Papers 6027, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  15. Michael Anderson & Stephen Smith, 1999. "Canadian Provinces in World Trade: Engagement and Detachment," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 22-38, February.
  16. Halvorsen, Robert & Palmquist, Raymond, 1980. "The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 474-475, June.
  17. Anderson, James E, 1979. "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 106-116, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:4:p:335-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.