IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v15y2012i1p169-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregation Issues in the Estimation of Linear Programming Productivity Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Saleem Shaik
  • Ashok K. Mishra
  • Joseph Atwood

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the sensitivity of the linear programming approach in the estimation of productivity measures in the primal framework. Specifically, the sensitivity to the number of constraints (level of dis-aggregation) and imposition of returns to scale constraints is evaluated. Further, the shadow or dual values are recovered from the linear program and compared to the market prices used in the ideal Fisher index approach. Empirical application to U.S. state-level time series data from 1960–2004 reveal productivity change decreases with increases in the number of constraints. Divergence in productivity measures is observed due to the choice of method imposed, various levels of commodity/input aggregation, and technology assumptions. Due to the piecewise linear approximation of the nonparametric programming approach, the shadow share-weights are skewed leading to the difference in the productivity measures due to aggregation.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleem Shaik & Ashok K. Mishra & Joseph Atwood, 2012. "Aggregation Issues in the Estimation of Linear Programming Productivity Measures," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 169-187, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:169-187
    DOI: 10.1016/S1514-0326(12)60008-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/S1514-0326(12)60008-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S1514-0326(12)60008-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fare, Rolf & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2003. "On aggregate Farrell efficiencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 615-620, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sakouvogui Kekoura & Shaik Saleem & Addey Kwame Asiam, 2020. "Cluster-Adjusted DEA Efficiency in the presence of Heterogeneity: An Application to Banking Sector," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 50-69, January.
    2. Saleem Shaik & Joseph Atwood, 2020. "A Comparative Study of Alternative Approaches to Estimate Productivity," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 18(4), pages 747-766, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolf Fare & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2005. "On Farrell's Decomposition and Aggregation," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 4(2), pages 167-171, August.
    2. Gary Ferrier & Hervé Leleu & Vivian Valdmanis, 2009. "Hospital capacity in large urban areas: is there enough in times of need?," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 103-117, October.
    3. Fang, Lei & Li, Hecheng, 2013. "A comment on “solving the puzzles of structural efficiency”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 444-446.
    4. Chun-kei Tsang & Sung-ko Li, 2020. "Allocation of resources within subgroups of an industry: a case study in the Chinese industrial sector," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 125-139, February.
    5. Barnabé Walheer, 2019. "Disaggregation for efficiency analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 137-151, June.
    6. Walheer, Barnabé, 2019. "Aggregating Farrell efficiencies with private and public inputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1170-1177.
    7. Vitaliy Zheka, 2005. "Corporate governance, ownership structure and corporate efficiency: the case of Ukraine," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 451-460.
    8. Salim, Ruhul & Arjomandi, Amir & Seufert, Juergen Heinz, 2016. "Does corporate governance affect Australian banks' performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 113-125.
    9. Cherchye, Laurens & Rock, Bram De & Saelens, Dieter & Verschelde, Marijn & Roets, Bart, 2024. "Productive efficiency analysis with unobserved inputs: An application to endogenous automation in railway traffic management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 678-690.
    10. Léopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2018. "Central Limit Theorems for Aggregate Efficiency," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 137-149, January.
    11. Claudia Curi & Ana Lozano-Vivas, 2015. "Financial center productivity and innovation prior to and during the financial crisis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 351-365, June.
    12. Luiz Chabalgoity & Emerson Marinho & Mauricio Benegas & Paulo de M. Jorge Neto, 2005. "The Impact Of De-Regulamentation On The Brazilian Banking Industry: A Production Metafrontier Approach," Anais do XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 33rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 093, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    13. Kjærsgaard, Jens, 2010. "Quest for appropriate overcapacity in the fisheries industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 141-150, September.
    14. Shaik, Saleem, 2009. "Aggregation Issues In The Estimation Of Malmquist Productivity Measures," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46553, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Shen, Zhiyang & Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Leleu, Hervé, 2017. "Aggregate green productivity growth in OECD’s countries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 30-39.
    16. Curi, Claudia & Lozano-Vivas, Ana & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2015. "Foreign bank diversification and efficiency prior to and during the financial crisis: Does one business model fit all?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(S1), pages 22-35.
    17. Badunenko, Oleg & Fritsch, Michael & Stephan, Andreas, 2008. "Allocative efficiency measurement revisited--Do we really need input prices?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1093-1109, September.
    18. Hall, Maximilian J.B. & Kenjegalieva, Karligash A. & Simper, Richard, 2012. "Environmental factors affecting Hong Kong banking: A post-Asian financial crisis efficiency analysis," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 184-201.
    19. Henderson, Daniel J. & Tochkov, Kiril & Badunenko, Oleg, 2007. "A drive up the capital coast? Contributions to post-reform growth across Chinese provinces," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 569-594, September.
    20. Colamartino, Chiara & Dipierro, Anna Rita & Toma, Pierluigi & Frittelli, Massimo, 2023. "What lies behind the success of Italian GIs products? Questioning tradition in consortia via aggregated conditional efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:169-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.