IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v36y2009i4p291-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empty container repositioning in liner shipping1

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Ping Song
  • Jonathan Carter

Abstract

The efficient and effective management of empty containers is an important problem in the shipping industry. Not only does it have an economic effect, but it also has an environmental and sustainability impact, since the reduction of empty container movements will reduce fuel consumption and reduce congestion and emissions. The purposes of this paper are: to identify critical factors that affect empty container movements; to quantify the scale of empty container repositioning in major shipping routes; and to evaluate and contrast different strategies that shipping lines, and container operators, could adopt to reduce their empty container repositioning costs. The critical factors that affect empty container repositioning are identified through a review of the literature and observations of industrial practice. Taking three major routes (Trans-Pacific, Trans-Atlantic, Europe--Asia) as examples, with the assumption that trade demands could be balanced among the whole network regardless the identities of individual shipping lines, the most optimistic estimation of empty container movements can be calculated. This quantifies the scale of the empty repositioning problem. Depending on whether shipping lines are coordinating the container flows over different routes and whether they are willing to share container fleets, four strategies for empty container repositioning are presented. Mathematical programming is then applied to evaluate and contrast the performance of these strategies in three major routes. -super-1A preliminary version was presented in IAME Annual Conference at Dalian, China, 2--4 April 2008.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Ping Song & Jonathan Carter, 2009. "Empty container repositioning in liner shipping1," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 291-307, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:36:y:2009:i:4:p:291-307
    DOI: 10.1080/03088830903056934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088830903056934
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088830903056934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuzmicz, Katarzyna Anna & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Approaches to empty container repositioning problems in the context of Eurasian intermodal transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 194-213.
    2. Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Greco, Luciano & Bell, Michael G.H., 2016. "Strategic maritime container service design in oligopolistic markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 22-37.
    3. Nguyen Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2014. "Empirical analysis of the container liner shipping network on the East-West corridor (1995–2011)," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 121-153, November.
    4. Guericke, Stefan & Tierney, Kevin, 2015. "Liner shipping cargo allocation with service levels and speed optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 40-60.
    5. Wu, Wei-Ming & Lin, Tsan-Hwan, 2015. "Selection behavior of the global container shipping industry for carrier-owned and leased containers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 11-19.
    6. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 0. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Long, Yin & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2012. "The sample average approximation method for empty container repositioning with uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 65-75.
    8. Mohammad Ghorbani & Michele Acciaro & Sandra Transchel & Pierre Cariou, 2022. "Strategic alliances in container shipping: A review of the literature and future research agenda," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 439-465, June.
    9. Yang, Ruina & Yu, Mingzhu & Lee, Chung-Yee & Du, Yuquan, 2021. "Contracting in ocean transportation with empty container repositioning under asymmetric information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Wu, Lingxiao & Jia, Shuai & Wang, Shuaian, 2020. "Pilotage planning in seaports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 90-105.
    11. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "Empty container exchange among liner carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 158-169.
    12. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2021. "Pricing and quality setting strategy in maritime transportation: Considering empty repositioning and demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. Edirisinghe, Lalith & Jin, Zhihong & Wijeratne, A.W., 2018. "The reality of container exchange between shipping lines: Clearing the pathway to virtual container yard," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 55-66.
    14. Kolar, Petr & Schramm, Hans-Joachim & Prockl, Günter, 2018. "Intermodal transport and repositioning of empty containers in Central and Eastern Europe hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 73-82.
    15. Zirui Liang & Ryuichi Shibasaki & Yuji Hoshino, 2021. "Do Foldable Containers Enhance Efficient Empty Container Repositioning under Demand Fluctuation?—Case of the Pacific Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Tsung-Chen Lee & Chia-Hsuan Wu & Paul T.-W. Lee, 2010. "Impacts of the ECFA on seaborne trade volume and policy development for shipping and port industry in Taiwan," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 169-189, December.
    17. Myung, Young-Soo & Yu, Yung-Mok, 2020. "Freight transportation network model with bundling option," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 179-201, September.
    19. Yu, Mingzhu & Fransoo, Jan C. & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2018. "Detention decisions for empty containers in the hinterland transportation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-208.
    20. Wong, Eugene Y.C. & Tai, Allen H. & Raman, Mardjuki, 2015. "A maritime container repositioning yield-based optimization model with uncertain upsurge demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 147-161.
    21. Jahn, Carlos & Schlingmeier, Johannes, 2014. "Cooperation in Empty Container Logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Current Issues and Emerging Practices. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferenc, volume 19, pages 499-514, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    22. Jean-Paul Rodrigue & Theo Notteboom, 2015. "Looking inside the box: evidence from the containerization of commodities and the cold chain," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 207-227, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:36:y:2009:i:4:p:291-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.