IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v4y2014i2p127-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are sustainable investment funds worth the effort?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Mervelskemper
  • Daniel Kaltofen
  • Stefan Stein

Abstract

The eco-efficiency approach [Schaltegger, S., and A. Sturm. 1990. "Ökologische Rationalität." Die Unternehmung 44 (4): 273-290; Holliday Jr., C. O., S. Schmidheiny, and P. Watts. 2002. Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development . San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers] suggest an outclassing shareholder value for sustainable investments as a result of more efficient risk and resource management, broader consumer acceptance and legitimation, fewer stakeholder conflicts, a higher level of labour satisfaction and a higher innovation rate. By contrast, modern portfolio theory, according to Markowitz [1952. "Portfolio Selection." The Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77-91] and Sharpe [1963. "A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis." Management Science 9 (2): 277-293], postulates a limited risk diversification and thus sub-optimal risk-adjusted returns for any less than perfect diversified asset portfolio like sustainable investment funds. Costs for running a firm 'sustainable' are supposed to decrease profits and destroy shareholder value even further. However, most previous empirical research found sustainable investment to be priced adequately. The scope of this study is to validate and update these results for the recent financial crisis from mid-2007 until mid-2011 including both strong bear and bull market climates. Comparing the performance of 47 actively managed German sustainable investment funds with the Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index as a benchmark, we do not find significant evidence for a mispricing of sustainable investments both during and post the financial crisis. The results underline that investors in German sustainability funds still do not have to sacrifice financial performance. For companies, our findings confirm the effectiveness to use stock markets as a source of capital even in the financial crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Mervelskemper & Daniel Kaltofen & Stefan Stein, 2014. "Are sustainable investment funds worth the effort?," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 127-146, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:127-146
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2013.837809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2013.837809
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2013.837809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grinblatt, Mark & Titman, Sheridan D, 1989. "Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(3), pages 393-416, July.
    2. Clotfelter, Charles T., 1985. "Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving," National Bureau of Economic Research Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226110486, March.
    3. Charles T. Clotfelter, 1985. "Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number clot85-1, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang Liu & Bowen Deng, 2023. "Is it really paid for sustainable development? The economic significance of firms' green practice," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 908-925, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur C. Brooks, 2001. "Private Philanthropy and the Economics of Public Radio," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 41, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    2. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    3. Natalie J. WEBB & Amy FARMER, 1996. "Corporate Goodwill:," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 29-50, March.
    4. Warren B. Hrung, 2004. "After‐Life Consumption and Charitable Giving," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 731-745, July.
    5. Forest L. Reinhardt & Robert N. Stavins & Richard H. K. Vietor, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 219-239, Summer.
    6. Daniel R. Feenberg, 1982. "Identification in Tax-Price Regression Models: The Case of Charitable Giving," NBER Working Papers 0988, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Dennis A. KAUFMAN, 1991. "Self-Serving Philanthropy And Pareto Optimality," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 573-590, October.
    8. Clotfelter, C. T., 2003. "Alumni giving to elite private colleges and universities," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 109-120, April.
    9. Asatryan, Zareh & Joulfaian, David, 2022. "Taxes and Business Philanthropy in Armenia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 914-930.
    10. Chan, Kenneth S. & Godby, Rob & Mestelman, Stuart & Andrew Muller, R., 2002. "Crowding-out voluntary contributions to public goods," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 305-317, July.
    11. Prouteau, Lionel & Wolff, François-Charles, 2008. "On the relational motive for volunteer work," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 314-335, June.
    12. David Roodman & Scott Standley, 2006. "Tax policies to promote private charitable giving in DAC countries," Working Papers 82, Center for Global Development.
    13. Emmanuel Saez, 2017. "Taxing the Rich More: Preliminary Evidence from the 2013 Tax Increase," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 71-120.
    14. Lionel Prouteau & François‐Charles Wolff, 2004. "Relational Goods and Associational Participation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 431-463, September.
    15. repec:zbw:rwirep:0349 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Brunner, Eric & Balsdon, Ed, 2004. "Intergenerational conflict and the political economy of school spending," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 369-388, September.
    17. Barrett, Kevin S. & McGuirk, Anya M. & Steinberg, Richard S., 1997. "Further Evidence on the Dynamic Impact of Taxes on Charitable Giving," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 50(2), pages 321-334, June.
    18. Vivekananda Mukherjee & Sugata Marjit & Gautam Gupta, 2003. "Private Contribution for Public Projects: Government versus NGOs," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 159(3), pages 553-570, September.
    19. Anubhav Gupta & Thomas Luke Spreen, 2024. "Do tax credits benefit charities? Evidence from two states," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(1), pages 94-109, January.
    20. Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2007. "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1774-1793, December.
    21. Bolton, Gary E. & Katok, Elena, 1998. "An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis: The nature of beneficent behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 315-331, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:127-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.