IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jocebs/v9y2011i2p205-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A short-run production function for electricity generation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Finn Førsund
  • Lennart Hjalmarsson
  • Jinghai Zheng

Abstract

Process industries, such as chemicals, aluminium, steel, pulp and paper, and thermal electricity generation, are important basic industries for economic growth in an economy such as the Chinese one. In order to promote improved efficiency and growth-inducing structural change, it is of paramount importance to model the development of such industries in a relevant way. It will then be necessary to go outside the smooth textbook production theory and turn to models incorporating typical features of process industries, such as embodied technical change, a sharp difference in substitution possibilities before and after investing, and a dynamic change at the industry level driven by entry and exit of plants and embodied technical change. The purpose of the paper is to give an introduction to the key production function concept of a short-run industry production function, and to show how this concept is the key to understanding industry dynamics. An empirical application is made on data for Chinese coal-fired electricity generation plants for one year. However, this will only be the first stage in a full-blown dynamic analysis. Combined cross-section and time-series data for plants are then required.

Suggested Citation

  • Finn Førsund & Lennart Hjalmarsson & Jinghai Zheng, 2011. "A short-run production function for electricity generation in China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 205-216.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:205-216
    DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2011.568689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14765284.2011.568689
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14765284.2011.568689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forsund, Finn R & Hjalmarsson, Lennart, 1983. "Technical Progress and Structural Change in the Swedish Cement Industry 1955-1979," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(5), pages 1449-1467, September.
    2. Forsund, Finn R & Jansen, Eilev S, 1983. " Technical Progress and Structural Change in the Norwegian Primary Aluminum Industry," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(2), pages 113-126.
    3. Hildenbrand, Werner, 1981. "Short-Run Production Functions Based on Microdata," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(5), pages 1095-1125, September.
    4. Forsund, Finn R & Hjalmarsson, Lennart & Summa, Timo, 1996. " The Interplay between Micro-Frontier and Sectoral Short-Run Production Functions," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(3), pages 365-386.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Finn R. Førsund & Ke Wang, 2020. "Measures of industry productivity change: the case of thermal electricity generation in Chinese provinces 2000–2014," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 37-52, February.
    2. Kristiaan Kerstens & Jafar Sadeghi & Ignace Woestyne & John Walden, 2024. "Short-run Johansen frontier-based industry models: methodological refinements and empirical illustration on fisheries," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 47-62, February.
    3. Førsund, Finn R. & Heshmati, Almas & Wang, Ke, 2018. "Dynamic Industry Productivity Measures: The case of thermal electricity generation by South Korean plants 2001-2008 and in Chinese regions 2000-2004," Memorandum 6/2018, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Førsund, Finn & Vislie, Jon, 2011. "From Macro Growth to Disaggregated Production Studies," Memorandum 22/2011, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    2. Førsund, Finn R. & Heshmati, Almas & Wang, Ke, 2018. "Dynamic Industry Productivity Measures: The case of thermal electricity generation by South Korean plants 2001-2008 and in Chinese regions 2000-2004," Memorandum 6/2018, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    3. Førsund, Finn R. & Vislie, Jon, 2016. "Leif Johansen on intra-industry structural change," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 515-527.
    4. Finn R. Førsund & Ke Wang, 2020. "Measures of industry productivity change: the case of thermal electricity generation in Chinese provinces 2000–2014," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 37-52, February.
    5. Kristiaan Kerstens & Jafar Sadeghi & Ignace Woestyne & John Walden, 2024. "Short-run Johansen frontier-based industry models: methodological refinements and empirical illustration on fisheries," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 47-62, February.
    6. Førsund, Finn R. & Hjalmarsson, Lennart, 2008. "Dynamic Analysis of Structural Change and Productivity Measurement," Memorandum 27/2008, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    7. Åke E. Andersson & Börje Johansson, 2018. "Inside and outside the black box: organization of interdependencies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(3), pages 501-516, November.
    8. Robert Ayres, 1995. "Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(3), pages 207-230, October.
    9. Diewert, W. Erwin, 2014. "Decompositions of profitability change using cost functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 58-66.
    10. Truchon, Michel, 1988. "Programmation mathématique et théorie économique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 64(2), pages 143-156, juin.
    11. Carmen Vicien, 1991. "Les modèles de simulation comme fonctions de production," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 204(1), pages 46-50.
    12. Annegrete Bruvoll & Torstein Bye & Jan Larsson & Kjetil Telle, 2003. "Technological changes in the pulp and paper industry and the role of uniform versus selective environmental policy," Discussion Papers 357, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    13. G. Dosi, 2012. "Economic Coordination and Dynamics: Some Elements of an Alternative “Evolutionary” Paradigm," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 12.
    14. Heijs, Joost & Arenas Díaz, Guillermo & Vergara Reyes, Delia Margarita, 2019. "Impact of innovation on employment in quantitative terms: review of empirical literature based on microdata," MPRA Paper 95326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Erik Biørn & Terje Skjerpen, 2002. "Aggregation and Aggregation Biases in Production Functions: A Panel Data Analysis of Translog Models," Discussion Papers 317, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    16. Stoker, Thomas M., 1982. "Completeness, distribution restrictions and the form of aggregate functions," Working papers 1345-82., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    17. Dosi, G. & Piva, M. & Virgillito, M.E. & Vivarelli, M., 2021. "Embodied and disembodied technological change: The sectoral patterns of job-creation and job-destruction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    18. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Bouye, Ahmed Moulaye Hachem & Van de Woestyne, Ignace & Vestergaard, Niels, 2008. "Optimal capacity utilization and reallocation in a German bank branch network: Exploring some strategic scenarios," Working Papers 2008/59, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    19. Giovanni Dosi & Marco Grazzi & Le Li & Luigi Marengo & Simona Settepanella, 2019. "Aggregate Productivity Growth in the Presence of (Persistently) Heterogeneous Firms," LEM Papers Series 2019/26, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Saeideh Fallah-Fini & Konstantinos Triantis & Andrew Johnson, 2014. "Reviewing the literature on non-parametric dynamic efficiency measurement: state-of-the-art," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 51-67, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:205-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.